Security testing
Skill bromso/metapowers/plugins/security/skills/security-testing
A Claude Code plugin that adds an agentic skills framework, with MCP's and a meta prompting processes. Inspired by "Superpowers" & "Figma Console MCP", but not just for development or design; but for all aspect within the digital production cycle.
npx -y skills add bromso/metapowers --skill security-testingAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Plan SAST, DAST, SCA, and penetration testing program
SKILL.md
4.8 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Security Testing
Plan a comprehensive security testing program for "$ARGUMENTS". Define testing types, select tools, integrate into CI/CD, and establish finding triage and remediation workflows.
Prerequisites
Read .metapowers/security/$ARGUMENTS/00-govern.md. If this file does not exist, tell the user:
Phase 0 (Govern) has not been completed for "$ARGUMENTS". Run a Govern skill first (e.g.,
/security:security-policy $ARGUMENTS), or use--skip-checksto bypass.
If --skip-checks is present in $ARGUMENTS, skip this check and log to .metapowers/security/$ARGUMENTS/skip-log.md.
Process
-
Define testing types and scope:
- SAST (Static Application Security Testing) — analyze source code for vulnerabilities without executing it; run in CI on every commit
- DAST (Dynamic Application Security Testing) — test running application by sending crafted requests; run against staging environment
- SCA (Software Composition Analysis) — analyze dependencies for known vulnerabilities and license issues; run in CI on every commit
- IAST (Interactive Application Security Testing) — instrument running application during testing to detect vulnerabilities in real-time
- Penetration testing — manual and automated testing by security experts; annual minimum plus after major architectural changes
- Define scope per testing type (which repositories, applications, environments)
-
Select tools per testing type:
- SAST — evaluate Semgrep, CodeQL, SonarQube, Checkmarx, Snyk Code (consider language support, custom rule capability, false positive rate)
- DAST — evaluate OWASP ZAP, Burp Suite, Nuclei, HCL AppScan (consider API testing support, authentication handling)
- SCA — evaluate Snyk, Dependabot, Renovate, OWASP Dependency-Check (consider advisory database coverage, license detection)
- IAST — evaluate Contrast Security, Hdiv (consider language support, performance overhead)
- Pen testing — define in-house vs. third-party engagement model, scope, and frequency
- Document selection criteria and chosen tools with justification
-
Define CI/CD integration points:
- Pre-commit — secrets scanning (pre-commit hooks with tools like detect-secrets, gitleaks)
- Pull request — SAST and SCA scans with inline PR comments on findings
- Build — container image scanning, SBOM generation
- Staging deploy — DAST scans against staging environment, IAST during integration tests
- Pre-production — full regression security scan before production promotion
- Define which checks are blocking (fail the build) vs. advisory (warn but allow)
-
Establish finding triage process:
- Define severity-based SLAs: critical (fix within 48 hours), high (1 week), medium (1 sprint), low (next quarter)
- Assign finding ownership (the team that owns the code owns the fix)
- Create triage workflow: new finding -> validate (true/false positive) -> assign -> fix -> verify -> close
- Define escalation path for SLA breaches
- Track security debt alongside technical debt
-
Manage false positives:
- Document process for marking false positives (requires security team approval)
- Maintain suppression list with expiration dates (re-evaluate periodically)
- Track false positive rate per tool to inform tuning and tool evaluation
- Create custom rules to reduce false positives for common code patterns
-
Define testing cadence:
- SAST and SCA: every commit (automated in CI)
- DAST: weekly against staging, plus on-demand for new features
- Penetration testing: annually minimum, plus after major changes (new auth system, new data flow, major architecture change)
- Red team exercises: annually for mature organizations
- Tabletop exercises: quarterly to test incident response
-
Write the artifact to
.metapowers/security/$ARGUMENTS/03-detect.mdwith heading:Security Testing Program
Include sections:
- Testing Types — each type with scope, frequency, and environment
- Tool Selection — chosen tools per type with selection rationale
- CI/CD Integration — integration points, blocking vs. advisory checks
- Finding Triage — severity SLAs, ownership model, and workflow
- False Positive Management — suppression process and tracking
- Testing Cadence — schedule for all testing activities
- Metrics — KPIs for testing program effectiveness
Output
The security testing program written to .metapowers/security/$ARGUMENTS/03-detect.md. Present a summary to the user highlighting:
- Testing types and their scope coverage
- Selected tools and CI/CD integration plan
- Finding severity SLAs and triage workflow
- Testing cadence and key milestones