agentsclimarketplace

Stakeholder update

Skill bromso/metapowers/plugins/project-management/skills/stakeholder-update

A Claude Code plugin that adds an agentic skills framework, with MCP's and a meta prompting processes. Inspired by "Superpowers" & "Figma Console MCP", but not just for development or design; but for all aspect within the digital production cycle.

Install
npx -y skills add bromso/metapowers --skill stakeholder-update

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Generate stakeholder status update with progress, risks, and asks

SKILL.md

4.6 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Stakeholder Update

Generate a stakeholder status update for "$ARGUMENTS". Summarize sprint progress, set RAG status, list risks and mitigations, note decisions needed, and include upcoming milestones.

Prerequisites

Check that .project/$ARGUMENTS/00-initiate.md exists. If it does not, tell the user to run an Initiate skill first (e.g., project-charter) and stop.

If the user passes --skip-checks, skip the prerequisite check and log the skip to .project/$ARGUMENTS/skip-log.md with a timestamp and reason.

Process

  1. Read existing context:

    • Read .project/$ARGUMENTS/00-initiate.md for stakeholder map, project charter, and team context
    • Read .project/$ARGUMENTS/03-review.md if it exists (for sprint review results and metrics)
    • Read .project/$ARGUMENTS/02-sprint.md if it exists (for sprint state, blockers, and standup history)
    • Read .project/$ARGUMENTS/01-plan.md if it exists (for roadmap, backlog, and milestone plan)
  2. Read stakeholder map:

    • Identify key stakeholders from the initiate phase
    • Determine the appropriate level of detail for each audience (executive summary vs. detailed report)
    • Note each stakeholder's primary concerns and interests
    • Tailor the update tone: executives want conciseness, technical leads want specifics
  3. Summarize sprint progress:

    • Report percentage of stories complete (completed / committed)
    • List key deliverables completed this sprint (feature names, not story IDs)
    • Note any significant achievements or milestones reached
    • If a sprint review exists, reference the commitment ratio
    • Keep the summary to 3-5 bullet points maximum
  4. Set overall RAG status:

    • Green: on track, no significant risks, sprint goal achieved or on pace
    • Amber: minor risks or delays, sprint goal at risk but recoverable, action needed
    • Red: significant risks or blockers, sprint goal missed or unrecoverable, escalation needed
    • Provide a one-line justification for the RAG status
    • Compare to the previous update's RAG status (improving, stable, or declining)
  5. List key risks and mitigations (top 3):

    • For each risk, describe: what the risk is, its likelihood (high/medium/low), its impact (high/medium/low)
    • For each risk, describe the mitigation plan or contingency action
    • Note any risks that have been resolved since the last update
    • Prioritize risks by impact — stakeholders care most about what could derail the project
    • If there are more than 3 risks, list the top 3 and note that additional risks are tracked separately
  6. Note decisions needed from stakeholders:

    • List any decisions that are pending and blocking progress
    • For each decision, explain: what the decision is, who needs to make it, the deadline, and the impact of delay
    • Provide a recommendation for each decision (do not just present options without a suggested path)
    • Mark decisions by urgency: this week, this sprint, next sprint
  7. List upcoming milestones and timeline confidence:

    • List the next 2-3 milestones with target dates
    • For each milestone, rate timeline confidence: high (>90%), medium (60-90%), low (<60%)
    • Note any milestones that have shifted since the last update and explain why
    • If there are dependencies on external teams or approvals, flag them here
  8. Include team capacity and morale note:

    • Briefly note team capacity: full strength, reduced (and why), or ramping up
    • Note any morale concerns: burnout risk, sustained overtime, team changes, celebrations
    • Keep this section brief (2-3 sentences) — it provides human context to the numbers
    • If there are asks related to team needs (hiring, tools, training), include them here
  9. Write the artifact — append to .project/$ARGUMENTS/03-review.md under a ## Stakeholder Update section:

    • RAG Status — Green/Amber/Red with one-line justification
    • Sprint Progress — key deliverables and completion percentage
    • Top Risks — top 3 risks with likelihood, impact, and mitigation
    • Decisions Needed — pending decisions with owners and deadlines
    • Upcoming Milestones — next milestones with dates and confidence levels
    • Team & Capacity — capacity status and morale note

Output

Stakeholder update appended to .project/$ARGUMENTS/03-review.md. Present a summary highlighting:

  • RAG status with justification
  • Sprint progress percentage and key deliverables
  • Top risk and its mitigation
  • Most urgent decision needed
  • Next milestone and timeline confidence

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.