agentsclimarketplace

Stakeholder update

Skill bromso/metapowers/plugins/project-management/skills/stakeholder-update

Generate stakeholder status update with progress, risks, and asksFrom its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add bromso/metapowers --skill stakeholder-update

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

SKILL.md

4.6 KB, ~1.1k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Stakeholder Update

Generate a stakeholder status update for "$ARGUMENTS". Summarize sprint progress, set RAG status, list risks and mitigations, note decisions needed, and include upcoming milestones.

Prerequisites

Check that .project/$ARGUMENTS/00-initiate.md exists. If it does not, tell the user to run an Initiate skill first (e.g., project-charter) and stop.

If the user passes --skip-checks, skip the prerequisite check and log the skip to .project/$ARGUMENTS/skip-log.md with a timestamp and reason.

Process

  1. Read existing context:

    • Read .project/$ARGUMENTS/00-initiate.md for stakeholder map, project charter, and team context
    • Read .project/$ARGUMENTS/03-review.md if it exists (for sprint review results and metrics)
    • Read .project/$ARGUMENTS/02-sprint.md if it exists (for sprint state, blockers, and standup history)
    • Read .project/$ARGUMENTS/01-plan.md if it exists (for roadmap, backlog, and milestone plan)
  2. Read stakeholder map:

    • Identify key stakeholders from the initiate phase
    • Determine the appropriate level of detail for each audience (executive summary vs. detailed report)
    • Note each stakeholder's primary concerns and interests
    • Tailor the update tone: executives want conciseness, technical leads want specifics
  3. Summarize sprint progress:

    • Report percentage of stories complete (completed / committed)
    • List key deliverables completed this sprint (feature names, not story IDs)
    • Note any significant achievements or milestones reached
    • If a sprint review exists, reference the commitment ratio
    • Keep the summary to 3-5 bullet points maximum
  4. Set overall RAG status:

    • Green: on track, no significant risks, sprint goal achieved or on pace
    • Amber: minor risks or delays, sprint goal at risk but recoverable, action needed
    • Red: significant risks or blockers, sprint goal missed or unrecoverable, escalation needed
    • Provide a one-line justification for the RAG status
    • Compare to the previous update's RAG status (improving, stable, or declining)
  5. List key risks and mitigations (top 3):

    • For each risk, describe: what the risk is, its likelihood (high/medium/low), its impact (high/medium/low)
    • For each risk, describe the mitigation plan or contingency action
    • Note any risks that have been resolved since the last update
    • Prioritize risks by impact — stakeholders care most about what could derail the project
    • If there are more than 3 risks, list the top 3 and note that additional risks are tracked separately
  6. Note decisions needed from stakeholders:

    • List any decisions that are pending and blocking progress
    • For each decision, explain: what the decision is, who needs to make it, the deadline, and the impact of delay
    • Provide a recommendation for each decision (do not just present options without a suggested path)
    • Mark decisions by urgency: this week, this sprint, next sprint
  7. List upcoming milestones and timeline confidence:

    • List the next 2-3 milestones with target dates
    • For each milestone, rate timeline confidence: high (>90%), medium (60-90%), low (<60%)
    • Note any milestones that have shifted since the last update and explain why
    • If there are dependencies on external teams or approvals, flag them here
  8. Include team capacity and morale note:

    • Briefly note team capacity: full strength, reduced (and why), or ramping up
    • Note any morale concerns: burnout risk, sustained overtime, team changes, celebrations
    • Keep this section brief (2-3 sentences) — it provides human context to the numbers
    • If there are asks related to team needs (hiring, tools, training), include them here
  9. Write the artifact — append to .project/$ARGUMENTS/03-review.md under a ## Stakeholder Update section:

    • RAG Status — Green/Amber/Red with one-line justification
    • Sprint Progress — key deliverables and completion percentage
    • Top Risks — top 3 risks with likelihood, impact, and mitigation
    • Decisions Needed — pending decisions with owners and deadlines
    • Upcoming Milestones — next milestones with dates and confidence levels
    • Team & Capacity — capacity status and morale note

Output

Stakeholder update appended to .project/$ARGUMENTS/03-review.md. Present a summary highlighting:

  • RAG status with justification
  • Sprint progress percentage and key deliverables
  • Top risk and its mitigation
  • Most urgent decision needed
  • Next milestone and timeline confidence

What ships with it

Read from the repository

Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.

Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most operations skills give in ~1.1k tokens

Counted across 483 of the 484 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-08-07

  • Collect monitoring data throughout the simulationin 14 of 483, across 6 files
  • Set the random seed for reproducibilityin 14 of 483, across 6 files
  • Validate simulations against analytical solutionsin 12 of 483, across 4 files
  • Clarify goals, constraints, and inputsin 11 of 483, across 2 files
  • Implement contract tests for integration pointsin 11 of 483, across 2 files
  • Implement strangler fig infrastructure with API gatewayin 11 of 483, across 2 files
  • Audit modernized components for security vulnerabilitiesin 11 of 483, across 2 files
  • Avoid Python blocking calls in processesin 10 of 483, across 3 files
  • Use resource context managers for automatic cleanupin 9 of 483, across 2 files
  • Maintain consistent time unitsin 9 of 483, across 2 files
  • Validate outcomes against success criteriain 8 of 483, across 1 file
  • Analyze the legacy codebase for technical debtin 8 of 483, across 1 file

Said here and by no other author read

  • check for initiate file before proceeding
  • identify key stakeholders from initiate phase
  • summarize sprint progress in three to five bullets
  • assign RAG status with one-line justification
  • list top three risks with mitigations
  • describe pending decisions with owners and deadlines

Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once. Length counted with cl100k_base; the agent that loads this file may tokenize it differently.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 325,949. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.