Legal playbook
Create standardized legal playbook for recurring scenariosFrom its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add bromso/metapowers --skill legal-playbookAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
5.1 KB, ~1.1k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Legal Playbook
Create a standardized legal playbook for "$ARGUMENTS". Define decision trees, approval thresholds, pre-approved templates, escalation criteria, and timeline expectations for recurring legal scenarios.
Note: AI-generated legal content does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney.
Prerequisites
Check that .metapowers/legal/$ARGUMENTS/00-assess.md exists. If it does not exist, stop and tell the user:
"Run an Assess skill first (e.g.
/legal:risk-assessment $ARGUMENTS) to generate the prerequisite assessment artifact."
If the user passes --skip-checks, bypass this check and log the skip to .metapowers/legal/$ARGUMENTS/skip-log.md with a timestamp and the reason "Prerequisite check skipped for legal-playbook".
Process
-
Read inputs:
- Read
.metapowers/legal/$ARGUMENTS/00-assess.mdfor risk context, jurisdiction, and organizational profile - Review any existing legal artifacts in
.metapowers/legal/$ARGUMENTS/
- Read
-
Identify recurring legal scenarios:
- Contract negotiation — standard terms, acceptable deviations, deal-breakers
- Data breach response — detection, containment, notification, remediation
- Employee termination — voluntary, involuntary, for cause, layoff procedures
- IP dispute — infringement claims, cease-and-desist responses, defensive actions
- Vendor onboarding — due diligence, contract requirements, risk assessment
- M&A due diligence — legal review scope, red flags, documentation requirements
- Regulatory inquiry — response protocols, document preservation, communication rules
- Tailor scenarios to the specific needs of "$ARGUMENTS"
-
Create decision tree for each scenario:
- Define the triggering event (what initiates the scenario)
- Map decision points with if/then logic (if X, then Y)
- Identify the possible outcomes at each branch
- Include time constraints at each decision point
- Document the rationale for each recommended path
-
Define approval thresholds:
- Pre-approved actions — what can proceed without legal review (e.g., standard NDA execution, routine contract renewals under a value threshold)
- Legal review required — what needs internal legal sign-off (e.g., non-standard terms, contracts above value threshold, new vendor categories)
- Outside counsel required — what needs external legal involvement (e.g., litigation, complex regulatory matters, high-value transactions)
- Set clear monetary and risk-based thresholds for each level
-
List pre-approved templates and fallback positions:
- For each scenario, identify available templates (NDAs, standard contracts, response letters)
- Define preferred terms and acceptable fallback positions for negotiations
- Document which template modifications are acceptable without additional review
- Maintain version control references for all templates
-
Set escalation criteria:
- Define when to involve internal legal counsel
- Define when to involve outside counsel
- Define when to notify executive leadership
- Include specific triggers: monetary thresholds, reputational risk, regulatory exposure, litigation threats
- Set maximum response times for each escalation level
-
Include timeline expectations:
- Standard turnaround times for each scenario type
- Expedited process for urgent matters
- SLA definitions for legal team response
- External dependencies and typical third-party timelines
-
Organize playbook by audience:
- Sales team — contract negotiation, NDA procedures, deal approval workflows
- Engineering — open-source compliance, IP considerations, security incident response
- HR — employment law procedures, termination protocols, discrimination/harassment response
- Procurement — vendor assessment, contract review, supplier risk management
- Each audience section should be self-contained with relevant scenarios only
-
Write the artifact to
.metapowers/legal/$ARGUMENTS/04-govern.mdwith frontmatter:--- description: Legal playbook for $ARGUMENTS ---Include sections:
- Scenario Index — overview of all covered scenarios with quick-reference links
- Decision Trees — visual decision flow per scenario
- Approval Matrix — thresholds and required approvals by scenario and value
- Templates and Fallback Positions — available templates with modification guidelines
- Escalation Guide — when and how to escalate by scenario type
- Timeline Expectations — standard and expedited turnaround times
- Audience-Specific Guides — tailored playbook sections per team
Output
The legal playbook written to .metapowers/legal/$ARGUMENTS/04-govern.md. Present a summary to the user highlighting:
- Number of scenarios covered and their categorization
- Key approval thresholds and escalation triggers
- Available pre-approved templates
- Audience-specific guide overview
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.
Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most legal skills give in ~1.1k tokens
Counted across 234 of the 234 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-08-07
- Use text operators for text fieldsin 11 of 234, across 6 files
- Consult qualified counsel before usein 11 of 234, across 3 files
- Use PatentSearch API for patent searchesin 10 of 234, across 5 files
- Confirm jurisdiction, employment type, and required clausesin 9 of 234, across 2 files
- Choose a document template and tailor role-specific termsin 9 of 234, across 2 files
- Validate compensation, benefits, and compliance requirementsin 9 of 234, across 2 files
- Add signature, confidentiality, and IP assignment terms as neededin 9 of 234, across 2 files
- Open the implementation playbook for detailed templatesin 9 of 234, across 2 files
- Use TSDR for trademark data retrievalin 9 of 234, across 4 files
- Ask for clarification if required inputs are missingin 8 of 234, across 2 files
- Set the USPTO_API_KEY environment variablein 8 of 234, across 3 files
- Use the uspto-opendata-python library for PEDSin 8 of 234, across 3 files
Said here and by no other author read
- verify prerequisite assessment artifact exists
- stop if prerequisite assessment is missing
- read assessment artifact for risk context
- identify recurring legal scenarios
- create decision tree for each scenario
- define approval thresholds for actions
Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once. Length counted with cl100k_base; the agent that loads this file may tokenize it differently.