agentsclimarketplace

Legal playbook

Skill bromso/metapowers/plugins/legal/skills/legal-playbook

Create standardized legal playbook for recurring scenariosFrom its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add bromso/metapowers --skill legal-playbook

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

SKILL.md

5.1 KB, ~1.1k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Legal Playbook

Create a standardized legal playbook for "$ARGUMENTS". Define decision trees, approval thresholds, pre-approved templates, escalation criteria, and timeline expectations for recurring legal scenarios.

Note: AI-generated legal content does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney.

Prerequisites

Check that .metapowers/legal/$ARGUMENTS/00-assess.md exists. If it does not exist, stop and tell the user:

"Run an Assess skill first (e.g. /legal:risk-assessment $ARGUMENTS) to generate the prerequisite assessment artifact."

If the user passes --skip-checks, bypass this check and log the skip to .metapowers/legal/$ARGUMENTS/skip-log.md with a timestamp and the reason "Prerequisite check skipped for legal-playbook".

Process

  1. Read inputs:

    • Read .metapowers/legal/$ARGUMENTS/00-assess.md for risk context, jurisdiction, and organizational profile
    • Review any existing legal artifacts in .metapowers/legal/$ARGUMENTS/
  2. Identify recurring legal scenarios:

    • Contract negotiation — standard terms, acceptable deviations, deal-breakers
    • Data breach response — detection, containment, notification, remediation
    • Employee termination — voluntary, involuntary, for cause, layoff procedures
    • IP dispute — infringement claims, cease-and-desist responses, defensive actions
    • Vendor onboarding — due diligence, contract requirements, risk assessment
    • M&A due diligence — legal review scope, red flags, documentation requirements
    • Regulatory inquiry — response protocols, document preservation, communication rules
    • Tailor scenarios to the specific needs of "$ARGUMENTS"
  3. Create decision tree for each scenario:

    • Define the triggering event (what initiates the scenario)
    • Map decision points with if/then logic (if X, then Y)
    • Identify the possible outcomes at each branch
    • Include time constraints at each decision point
    • Document the rationale for each recommended path
  4. Define approval thresholds:

    • Pre-approved actions — what can proceed without legal review (e.g., standard NDA execution, routine contract renewals under a value threshold)
    • Legal review required — what needs internal legal sign-off (e.g., non-standard terms, contracts above value threshold, new vendor categories)
    • Outside counsel required — what needs external legal involvement (e.g., litigation, complex regulatory matters, high-value transactions)
    • Set clear monetary and risk-based thresholds for each level
  5. List pre-approved templates and fallback positions:

    • For each scenario, identify available templates (NDAs, standard contracts, response letters)
    • Define preferred terms and acceptable fallback positions for negotiations
    • Document which template modifications are acceptable without additional review
    • Maintain version control references for all templates
  6. Set escalation criteria:

    • Define when to involve internal legal counsel
    • Define when to involve outside counsel
    • Define when to notify executive leadership
    • Include specific triggers: monetary thresholds, reputational risk, regulatory exposure, litigation threats
    • Set maximum response times for each escalation level
  7. Include timeline expectations:

    • Standard turnaround times for each scenario type
    • Expedited process for urgent matters
    • SLA definitions for legal team response
    • External dependencies and typical third-party timelines
  8. Organize playbook by audience:

    • Sales team — contract negotiation, NDA procedures, deal approval workflows
    • Engineering — open-source compliance, IP considerations, security incident response
    • HR — employment law procedures, termination protocols, discrimination/harassment response
    • Procurement — vendor assessment, contract review, supplier risk management
    • Each audience section should be self-contained with relevant scenarios only
  9. Write the artifact to .metapowers/legal/$ARGUMENTS/04-govern.md with frontmatter:

    ---
    description: Legal playbook for $ARGUMENTS
    ---
    

    Include sections:

    • Scenario Index — overview of all covered scenarios with quick-reference links
    • Decision Trees — visual decision flow per scenario
    • Approval Matrix — thresholds and required approvals by scenario and value
    • Templates and Fallback Positions — available templates with modification guidelines
    • Escalation Guide — when and how to escalate by scenario type
    • Timeline Expectations — standard and expedited turnaround times
    • Audience-Specific Guides — tailored playbook sections per team

Output

The legal playbook written to .metapowers/legal/$ARGUMENTS/04-govern.md. Present a summary to the user highlighting:

  • Number of scenarios covered and their categorization
  • Key approval thresholds and escalation triggers
  • Available pre-approved templates
  • Audience-specific guide overview

What ships with it

Read from the repository

Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.

Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most legal skills give in ~1.1k tokens

Counted across 234 of the 234 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-08-07

  • Use text operators for text fieldsin 11 of 234, across 6 files
  • Consult qualified counsel before usein 11 of 234, across 3 files
  • Use PatentSearch API for patent searchesin 10 of 234, across 5 files
  • Confirm jurisdiction, employment type, and required clausesin 9 of 234, across 2 files
  • Choose a document template and tailor role-specific termsin 9 of 234, across 2 files
  • Validate compensation, benefits, and compliance requirementsin 9 of 234, across 2 files
  • Add signature, confidentiality, and IP assignment terms as neededin 9 of 234, across 2 files
  • Open the implementation playbook for detailed templatesin 9 of 234, across 2 files
  • Use TSDR for trademark data retrievalin 9 of 234, across 4 files
  • Ask for clarification if required inputs are missingin 8 of 234, across 2 files
  • Set the USPTO_API_KEY environment variablein 8 of 234, across 3 files
  • Use the uspto-opendata-python library for PEDSin 8 of 234, across 3 files

Said here and by no other author read

  • verify prerequisite assessment artifact exists
  • stop if prerequisite assessment is missing
  • read assessment artifact for risk context
  • identify recurring legal scenarios
  • create decision tree for each scenario
  • define approval thresholds for actions

Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once. Length counted with cl100k_base; the agent that loads this file may tokenize it differently.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 325,949. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.