Legal playbook
A Claude Code plugin that adds an agentic skills framework, with MCP's and a meta prompting processes. Inspired by "Superpowers" & "Figma Console MCP", but not just for development or design; but for all aspect within the digital production cycle.
npx -y skills add bromso/metapowers --skill legal-playbookAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Create standardized legal playbook for recurring scenarios
SKILL.md
5.1 KB, ~1.1k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Legal Playbook
Create a standardized legal playbook for "$ARGUMENTS". Define decision trees, approval thresholds, pre-approved templates, escalation criteria, and timeline expectations for recurring legal scenarios.
Note: AI-generated legal content does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney.
Prerequisites
Check that .metapowers/legal/$ARGUMENTS/00-assess.md exists. If it does not exist, stop and tell the user:
"Run an Assess skill first (e.g.
/legal:risk-assessment $ARGUMENTS) to generate the prerequisite assessment artifact."
If the user passes --skip-checks, bypass this check and log the skip to .metapowers/legal/$ARGUMENTS/skip-log.md with a timestamp and the reason "Prerequisite check skipped for legal-playbook".
Process
-
Read inputs:
- Read
.metapowers/legal/$ARGUMENTS/00-assess.mdfor risk context, jurisdiction, and organizational profile - Review any existing legal artifacts in
.metapowers/legal/$ARGUMENTS/
- Read
-
Identify recurring legal scenarios:
- Contract negotiation — standard terms, acceptable deviations, deal-breakers
- Data breach response — detection, containment, notification, remediation
- Employee termination — voluntary, involuntary, for cause, layoff procedures
- IP dispute — infringement claims, cease-and-desist responses, defensive actions
- Vendor onboarding — due diligence, contract requirements, risk assessment
- M&A due diligence — legal review scope, red flags, documentation requirements
- Regulatory inquiry — response protocols, document preservation, communication rules
- Tailor scenarios to the specific needs of "$ARGUMENTS"
-
Create decision tree for each scenario:
- Define the triggering event (what initiates the scenario)
- Map decision points with if/then logic (if X, then Y)
- Identify the possible outcomes at each branch
- Include time constraints at each decision point
- Document the rationale for each recommended path
-
Define approval thresholds:
- Pre-approved actions — what can proceed without legal review (e.g., standard NDA execution, routine contract renewals under a value threshold)
- Legal review required — what needs internal legal sign-off (e.g., non-standard terms, contracts above value threshold, new vendor categories)
- Outside counsel required — what needs external legal involvement (e.g., litigation, complex regulatory matters, high-value transactions)
- Set clear monetary and risk-based thresholds for each level
-
List pre-approved templates and fallback positions:
- For each scenario, identify available templates (NDAs, standard contracts, response letters)
- Define preferred terms and acceptable fallback positions for negotiations
- Document which template modifications are acceptable without additional review
- Maintain version control references for all templates
-
Set escalation criteria:
- Define when to involve internal legal counsel
- Define when to involve outside counsel
- Define when to notify executive leadership
- Include specific triggers: monetary thresholds, reputational risk, regulatory exposure, litigation threats
- Set maximum response times for each escalation level
-
Include timeline expectations:
- Standard turnaround times for each scenario type
- Expedited process for urgent matters
- SLA definitions for legal team response
- External dependencies and typical third-party timelines
-
Organize playbook by audience:
- Sales team — contract negotiation, NDA procedures, deal approval workflows
- Engineering — open-source compliance, IP considerations, security incident response
- HR — employment law procedures, termination protocols, discrimination/harassment response
- Procurement — vendor assessment, contract review, supplier risk management
- Each audience section should be self-contained with relevant scenarios only
-
Write the artifact to
.metapowers/legal/$ARGUMENTS/04-govern.mdwith frontmatter:--- description: Legal playbook for $ARGUMENTS ---Include sections:
- Scenario Index — overview of all covered scenarios with quick-reference links
- Decision Trees — visual decision flow per scenario
- Approval Matrix — thresholds and required approvals by scenario and value
- Templates and Fallback Positions — available templates with modification guidelines
- Escalation Guide — when and how to escalate by scenario type
- Timeline Expectations — standard and expedited turnaround times
- Audience-Specific Guides — tailored playbook sections per team
Output
The legal playbook written to .metapowers/legal/$ARGUMENTS/04-govern.md. Present a summary to the user highlighting:
- Number of scenarios covered and their categorization
- Key approval thresholds and escalation triggers
- Available pre-approved templates
- Audience-specific guide overview