agentsclimarketplace

Incident response plan

Skill bromso/metapowers/plugins/legal/skills/incident-response-plan

A Claude Code plugin that adds an agentic skills framework, with MCP's and a meta prompting processes. Inspired by "Superpowers" & "Figma Console MCP", but not just for development or design; but for all aspect within the digital production cycle.

Install
npx -y skills add bromso/metapowers --skill incident-response-plan

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Create data breach and security incident response plan

SKILL.md

7.7 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Incident Response Plan

Create a data breach and security incident response plan for "$ARGUMENTS". Define incident classification, response procedures, notification requirements, communication templates, and post-incident review processes.

Note: AI-generated legal content does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney.

Prerequisites

Check that .metapowers/legal/$ARGUMENTS/00-assess.md exists. If it does not exist, stop and tell the user:

"Run an Assess skill first (e.g. /legal:risk-assessment $ARGUMENTS) to generate the prerequisite assessment artifact."

If the user passes --skip-checks, bypass this check and log the skip to .metapowers/legal/$ARGUMENTS/skip-log.md with a timestamp and the reason "Prerequisite check skipped for incident-response-plan".

Process

  1. Read inputs:

    • Read .metapowers/legal/$ARGUMENTS/00-assess.md for risk, jurisdiction, and data practice context
    • Read any existing security or compliance artifacts in .metapowers/legal/$ARGUMENTS/ for additional context
  2. Define incident types and severity classification:

    • P1 — Critical: confirmed data breach with sensitive personal data exposed, ransomware with data exfiltration, compromise of authentication systems, regulatory notification thresholds met
    • P2 — High: unauthorized access to systems containing personal data, significant service disruption, suspected data breach under investigation, insider threat confirmed
    • P3 — Medium: attempted unauthorized access (blocked but notable), minor data exposure (non-sensitive, limited scope), malware detection on non-critical systems, policy violations with data implications
    • P4 — Low: phishing attempts (no compromise), minor policy violations, vulnerability discovered (not exploited), suspicious activity under monitoring
    • Escalation criteria between severity levels
  3. Create detection and identification procedures:

    • Technical detection sources (SIEM, IDS/IPS, endpoint detection, DLP, log monitoring)
    • Human reporting channels (employee reporting, customer complaints, partner notifications, threat intelligence feeds)
    • Initial triage checklist (what happened, when, what systems/data affected, is it ongoing, initial severity assessment)
    • Documentation requirements from point of detection
  4. Define incident response team:

    • Incident Commander — overall coordination, decision authority, stakeholder communication
    • Technical Lead — technical investigation, containment, remediation
    • Legal Counsel — notification obligations, regulatory requirements, privilege considerations, law enforcement liaison
    • Communications Lead — internal and external communications, media handling
    • Executive Sponsor — business decisions, resource authorization, board reporting
    • Contact information and escalation paths (primary and backup for each role)
    • External resources (forensics firm, outside counsel, crisis communications, cyber insurance carrier)
  5. Containment procedures:

    • Immediate containment (first 1-4 hours) — isolate affected systems, preserve evidence, block attack vectors, activate incident response team
    • Short-term containment (4-48 hours) — implement temporary fixes, enhanced monitoring, assess scope
    • Long-term containment — system rebuilds, credential resets, architecture changes
    • Decision framework for system shutdown vs. monitored containment
    • Evidence preservation requirements during containment
  6. Investigation steps:

    • Root cause analysis methodology
    • Scope determination (what data, how many records, which individuals, geographic scope)
    • Affected data and individual identification
    • Attack vector and timeline reconstruction
    • Forensic evidence collection and chain of custody
    • Engagement criteria for external forensics
  7. Notification requirements by jurisdiction:

    • GDPR (EU): 72 hours to supervisory authority (Article 33), without undue delay to individuals when high risk (Article 34)
    • US state breach notification laws: varies 30-90 days depending on state (document requirements for each applicable state)
    • Sector-specific: HIPAA — 60 days to HHS, individuals, and media (if 500+ affected); GLBA — 36 hours to primary federal regulator; PCI DSS — immediate to acquiring bank and card brands
    • Other jurisdictions: document notification requirements based on assessment context
    • Notification content requirements per jurisdiction
    • Attorney General notification requirements
    • Credit monitoring obligations
  8. Draft communication templates:

    • Regulatory notification — nature of breach, categories and approximate number of data subjects, DPO contact, likely consequences, measures taken
    • Affected individual notice — plain language description, data involved, steps taken, recommended protective actions, contact information for questions
    • Media statement — brief factual statement, commitment to transparency, contact for inquiries
    • Internal communication — employee notification, management briefing, board notification
    • Customer FAQ — anticipated questions and approved responses
    • Version control and approval workflow for all communications
  9. Evidence preservation procedures:

    • System logs and their retention
    • Forensic image requirements
    • Chain of custody documentation
    • Legal hold procedures
    • Attorney-client privilege considerations for investigation materials
  10. Post-incident review process:

    • Lessons learned meeting (within 1-2 weeks of incident closure)
    • Root cause analysis documentation
    • Control improvement recommendations
    • Policy and procedure updates
    • Training needs identified
    • Metrics tracking (detection time, containment time, notification time, total resolution time)
  11. Tabletop exercise plan:

    • Exercise scenarios (one per incident type/severity)
    • Participant roles and preparation
    • Exercise facilitation guide
    • Evaluation criteria
    • Recommended frequency (at minimum annually, quarterly for high-risk organizations)
    • Documentation and improvement tracking
  12. Write the artifact to .metapowers/legal/$ARGUMENTS/03-comply.md with frontmatter:

    ---
    description: Incident response plan for $ARGUMENTS
    ---
    

    Include sections:

    • Incident Classification — types and severity levels (P1-P4)
    • Detection and Identification — sources, channels, and triage procedures
    • Incident Response Team — roles, contacts, and escalation paths
    • Containment Procedures — immediate, short-term, and long-term actions
    • Investigation Framework — root cause, scope, and forensics
    • Notification Requirements — jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction obligations and timelines
    • Communication Templates — regulatory, individual, media, and internal templates
    • Evidence Preservation — collection, custody, and legal hold procedures
    • Post-Incident Review — lessons learned and improvement process
    • Tabletop Exercise Plan — scenarios, facilitation, and schedule
    • Compliance Gaps — identified gaps with remediation recommendations

Output

The incident response plan written to .metapowers/legal/$ARGUMENTS/03-comply.md. Present a summary to the user highlighting:

  • Incident severity classification (P1-P4) defined
  • Incident response team roles identified
  • Notification requirements by jurisdiction with timelines
  • Communication templates drafted
  • Tabletop exercise plan and recommended frequency
  • Critical gaps in current incident preparedness

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.