Compliance review
Skill bromso/metapowers/plugins/legal/skills/compliance-review
Review document for regulatory compliance (GDPR, CCPA, SOC2, etc.)From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add bromso/metapowers --skill compliance-reviewAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
5.1 KB, ~1.1k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Compliance Review
Review the document for "$ARGUMENTS" against applicable regulatory frameworks. Check compliance with GDPR, CCPA, SOC2, and other relevant regulations, scoring compliance level and identifying specific gaps.
Note: AI-generated legal content does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney.
Prerequisites
Check that .metapowers/legal/$ARGUMENTS/00-assess.md exists. If it does not exist, stop and tell the user:
"Run an Assess skill first (e.g.
/legal:risk-assessment $ARGUMENTS) to generate the prerequisite assessment artifact."
If the user passes --skip-checks, bypass this check and log the skip to .metapowers/legal/$ARGUMENTS/skip-log.md with a timestamp and the reason "Prerequisite check skipped for compliance-review".
Process
-
Read inputs:
- Read
.metapowers/legal/$ARGUMENTS/00-assess.mdfor risk and jurisdiction context - Read
plugins/legal/shared/compliance-checklist.mdfor reference requirements - Read the document from the source provided by the user
- Read
-
Determine applicable regulations:
- Based on jurisdiction, industry, and data types identified in the assessment
- Prioritize regulations by relevance and enforcement risk
-
Check GDPR compliance (if applicable):
- Lawful basis — is a lawful basis for processing identified (consent, legitimate interest, contract, etc.)?
- Data processing provisions — are controller/processor roles defined with adequate DPA terms?
- Data subject rights — are rights addressed (access, rectification, erasure, portability, objection)?
- International transfers — are transfer mechanisms in place (SCCs, adequacy decisions, BCRs)?
- Breach notification — are notification obligations defined (72-hour timeline, authority and data subject notification)?
- Data Protection Impact Assessment — is a DPIA referenced or required for high-risk processing?
- Records of processing — are record-keeping obligations addressed?
-
Check CCPA/CPRA compliance (if applicable):
- Notice at collection — are categories of personal information and purposes disclosed?
- Opt-out rights — is the right to opt out of sale/sharing of personal information addressed?
- Deletion rights — are consumer deletion request procedures defined?
- Non-discrimination — is there a commitment not to discriminate against consumers exercising rights?
- Service provider obligations — are contractual restrictions on use of personal information included?
- Sensitive personal information — are additional protections for sensitive categories addressed?
-
Check SOC2 compliance (if applicable):
- Security controls — are security measures documented (encryption, access controls, monitoring)?
- Availability commitments — are uptime and recovery commitments defined?
- Incident response — is an incident response plan referenced or required?
- Change management — are change control procedures addressed?
- Vendor management — are sub-processor or subcontractor controls defined?
-
Check accessibility compliance (if applicable):
- WCAG 2.1 AA compliance commitments
- Accessibility testing obligations
- Remediation timelines for accessibility issues
-
Score compliance level per regulation:
- Compliant — all material requirements addressed with adequate provisions
- Partially Compliant — some requirements addressed but with notable gaps
- Non-Compliant — critical requirements missing or inadequately addressed
-
Identify specific gaps and suggest compliant alternatives:
- For each gap, reference the specific regulatory requirement
- Provide draft language or provisions that would close the gap
- Prioritize gaps by enforcement risk and potential penalty exposure
-
Write the artifact to
.metapowers/legal/$ARGUMENTS/02-review.mdwith frontmatter:--- description: Compliance review for $ARGUMENTS ---Include sections:
- Applicable Regulations — list of regulations checked and rationale for inclusion
- GDPR Assessment — item-by-item compliance check (if applicable)
- CCPA/CPRA Assessment — item-by-item compliance check (if applicable)
- SOC2 Assessment — item-by-item compliance check (if applicable)
- Accessibility Assessment — item-by-item compliance check (if applicable)
- Compliance Scorecard — Compliant/Partially Compliant/Non-Compliant per regulation
- Gap Analysis — specific gaps with regulatory reference and risk level
- Remediation Recommendations — suggested language or provisions per gap
Output
The compliance review written to .metapowers/legal/$ARGUMENTS/02-review.md. Present a summary to the user highlighting:
- Compliance scorecard across all applicable regulations
- Critical gaps (Non-Compliant items) requiring immediate attention
- Number of gaps per regulation and overall compliance posture
- Top 3 remediation priorities
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.