agentsclimarketplace

Vendor tprm

Skill bromso/metapowers/plugins/compliance/skills/vendor-tprm

A Claude Code plugin that adds an agentic skills framework, with MCP's and a meta prompting processes. Inspired by "Superpowers" & "Figma Console MCP", but not just for development or design; but for all aspect within the digital production cycle.

Install
npx -y skills add bromso/metapowers --skill vendor-tprm

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Assess vendor/third-party risk management program

SKILL.md

5.8 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Vendor / Third-Party Risk Management Assessment

Assess the vendor and third-party risk management (TPRM) program for "$ARGUMENTS". Evaluate vendor lifecycle management from identification through offboarding, including due diligence, contractual requirements, ongoing monitoring, and subprocessor management.

Prerequisites

Read .metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/00-scope.md. If this file does not exist, tell the user:

Phase 0 (Scope) has not been completed for "$ARGUMENTS". Run /compliance:regulatory-landscape $ARGUMENTS first, or use --skip-checks to bypass.

If --skip-checks is present in $ARGUMENTS, skip this check.

Process

  1. Read context files:

    • Read plugins/compliance/shared/grc-lifecycle-guide.md for GRC methodology reference
    • Read plugins/compliance/shared/assessment-template.md for output structure
    • Read .metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/00-scope.md for scope and control framework context
  2. Vendor identification and classification:

    • Assess vendor inventory completeness (all third parties identified and cataloged)
    • Evaluate risk-based classification methodology (critical, high, medium, low risk)
    • Review classification criteria: data access, system connectivity, business impact, regulatory scope, replaceability
    • Assess vendor categorization by type (cloud services, SaaS, professional services, outsourced operations, subcontractors)
    • Evaluate concentration risk assessment (dependency on single vendors, geographic concentration)
  3. Due diligence process:

    • Assess pre-engagement due diligence procedures per risk tier
    • Evaluate security questionnaire process (SIG, CAIQ, custom questionnaires)
    • Review SOC report analysis (SOC 2 Type II, SOC 1, bridging letters, complementary user entity controls)
    • Assess penetration testing and vulnerability assessment requirements for vendors
    • Evaluate financial stability assessment (credit reports, financial statements, insurance coverage)
    • Review legal and regulatory compliance verification (certifications, licenses, regulatory actions)
    • Assess business continuity and disaster recovery capability evaluation
    • Evaluate privacy impact assessment for vendors processing personal data
  4. Contractual requirements:

    • Assess Data Processing Agreement (DPA) coverage and adequacy
    • Evaluate Service Level Agreements (SLAs) with measurable metrics and remedies
    • Review security addenda and minimum security requirements
    • Assess right-to-audit clauses and audit facilitation provisions
    • Evaluate breach notification requirements (timelines, content, cooperation)
    • Review data return/destruction clauses upon termination
    • Assess liability, indemnification, and insurance requirements
    • Evaluate subprocessor approval and notification rights
  5. Ongoing monitoring:

    • Assess periodic reassessment cadence per risk tier (annual for critical, biennial for high, etc.)
    • Evaluate continuous monitoring signals (security ratings, breach notifications, news monitoring)
    • Review performance monitoring against SLAs and KPIs
    • Assess incident and near-miss tracking for vendor-related events
    • Evaluate vendor relationship governance (steering committees, business reviews)
    • Review compliance certificate and certification renewal tracking
    • Assess trigger-based reassessment procedures (material changes, incidents, M&A)
  6. Offboarding procedures:

    • Assess data return and destruction procedures (certificates of destruction, verification)
    • Evaluate access revocation process (system access, physical access, credentials)
    • Review knowledge transfer requirements for critical vendors
    • Assess transition planning and migration support obligations
    • Evaluate post-termination confidentiality and data handling obligations
  7. Subprocessor management:

    • Assess subprocessor identification and approval workflow
    • Evaluate notification obligations for subprocessor changes (advance notice period)
    • Review flow-down requirements (security, privacy, compliance obligations)
    • Assess objection rights and procedures for subprocessor changes
    • Evaluate fourth-party risk visibility and oversight
  8. Program governance:

    • Assess TPRM policy and procedures documentation
    • Evaluate roles and responsibilities (TPRM team, business owners, legal, security, privacy)
    • Review TPRM tooling and automation (GRC platform, vendor risk management system)
    • Assess reporting and metrics (vendor risk dashboards, board reporting)
    • Evaluate exception and risk acceptance processes
  9. Write the artifact to .metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/01-assess/vendor-tprm.md following the assessment template structure with:

    • Vendor Inventory — completeness and risk classification coverage
    • Due Diligence — process maturity per risk tier and assessment coverage
    • Contractual Framework — DPA, SLA, security, and audit clause coverage
    • Ongoing Monitoring — reassessment cadence, continuous monitoring, and performance tracking
    • Offboarding — data destruction, access revocation, and transition procedures
    • Subprocessor Management — identification, approval, and flow-down requirements
    • Program Governance — policy, roles, tooling, and reporting
    • Evidence Inventory — existing evidence and evidence gaps
    • Remediation Priorities — ranked list of gaps to address

Output

The vendor TPRM assessment written to .metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/01-assess/vendor-tprm.md. Present a summary to the user highlighting:

  • Vendor inventory completeness and risk classification coverage
  • Due diligence and contractual coverage rates by risk tier
  • Ongoing monitoring maturity and reassessment compliance
  • Top 3 gaps requiring remediation

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.