Nist ai rmf

NIST AI RMF Assessment

Assess NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) alignment for "$ARGUMENTS". Evaluate maturity across the four core functions (Govern, Map, Measure, Manage) and assess AI trustworthiness characteristics.

Prerequisites

Read .metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/00-scope.md. If this file does not exist, tell the user:

Phase 0 (Scope) has not been completed for "$ARGUMENTS". Run /compliance:regulatory-landscape $ARGUMENTS first, or use --skip-checks to bypass.

If --skip-checks is present in $ARGUMENTS, skip this check.

Process

1. Read context files:

   • Read plugins/compliance/shared/grc-lifecycle-guide.md for GRC methodology reference
   • Read plugins/compliance/shared/assessment-template.md for output structure
   • Read .metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/00-scope.md for scope and control framework context

2. GOVERN function assessment:

   • Assess AI governance policies and procedures (GOVERN 1)
   • Evaluate organizational roles, responsibilities, and accountability for AI risk (GOVERN 2)
   • Review workforce diversity, equity, and AI literacy programs (GOVERN 3)
   • Assess organizational culture for AI risk management (GOVERN 4)
   • Evaluate legal and regulatory compliance processes for AI (GOVERN 5)
   • Review oversight mechanisms and escalation procedures (GOVERN 6)
   • Score maturity: ad hoc, defined, managed, measured, optimized

3. MAP function assessment:

   • Assess AI system context establishment and intended purpose documentation (MAP 1)
   • Evaluate AI risk categorization and classification methodology (MAP 2)
   • Review stakeholder identification and engagement (MAP 3)
   • Assess AI system risk identification across the lifecycle (MAP 4)
   • Evaluate benefits and costs documentation for AI systems (MAP 5)
   • Score maturity: ad hoc, defined, managed, measured, optimized

4. MEASURE function assessment:

   • Assess AI risk measurement metrics and methodologies (MEASURE 1)
   • Evaluate AI system evaluation approaches (testing, red-teaming, field testing) (MEASURE 2)
   • Review AI risk tracking and monitoring mechanisms (MEASURE 3)
   • Assess feedback mechanisms for measurement improvement (MEASURE 4)
   • Score maturity: ad hoc, defined, managed, measured, optimized

5. MANAGE function assessment:

   • Assess AI risk prioritization and response planning (MANAGE 1)
   • Evaluate risk treatment strategies (mitigate, transfer, avoid, accept) (MANAGE 2)
   • Review incident response and escalation for AI systems (MANAGE 3)
   • Assess continuous monitoring and risk review processes (MANAGE 4)
   • Score maturity: ad hoc, defined, managed, measured, optimized

6. AI trustworthiness characteristics assessment:

   • Valid and reliable: Assess validation processes, performance benchmarks, and reliability testing
   • Safe: Evaluate safety requirements, testing for harmful outcomes, and fail-safe mechanisms
   • Secure and resilient: Assess cybersecurity measures, adversarial robustness, and resilience testing
   • Accountable and transparent: Evaluate accountability structures, audit trails, and transparency practices
   • Explainable and interpretable: Assess model interpretability, explanation methods, and user-facing explanations
   • Privacy-enhanced: Evaluate privacy-preserving techniques, data minimization, and privacy risk assessments
   • Fair (bias managed): Assess bias identification, measurement, and mitigation across the AI lifecycle

7. Cross-function maturity summary:

   • Create maturity heatmap across all four functions and sub-categories
   • Identify systemic gaps and organizational capability weaknesses
   • Map findings to AI trustworthiness characteristics
   • Assess overall organizational AI risk management maturity

8. Write the artifact to .metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/01-assess/nist-ai-rmf.md following the assessment template structure with:

   • GOVERN Maturity — policies, roles, culture, and oversight assessment
   • MAP Maturity — context, categorization, stakeholders, and risk identification
   • MEASURE Maturity — metrics, evaluation, tracking, and feedback
   • MANAGE Maturity — prioritization, treatment, response, and monitoring
   • Trustworthiness Assessment — scoring per characteristic (valid, safe, secure, accountable, explainable, privacy, fair)
   • Maturity Heatmap — cross-function maturity visualization
   • Evidence Inventory — existing evidence and evidence gaps
   • Remediation Priorities — ranked list of gaps to address

Output

The NIST AI RMF assessment written to .metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/01-assess/nist-ai-rmf.md. Present a summary to the user highlighting:

• Overall maturity score per core function (Govern, Map, Measure, Manage)
• AI trustworthiness characteristics strengths and weaknesses
• Systemic capability gaps across functions
• Top 3 gaps requiring remediation