Hipaa
A Claude Code plugin that adds an agentic skills framework, with MCP's and a meta prompting processes. Inspired by "Superpowers" & "Figma Console MCP", but not just for development or design; but for all aspect within the digital production cycle.
npx -y skills add bromso/metapowers --skill hipaaAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Assess HIPAA compliance — Privacy Rule, Security Rule, Breach Notification, BAAs
SKILL.md
4.6 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
HIPAA Assessment
Assess Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliance for "$ARGUMENTS". Evaluate Privacy Rule, Security Rule, Breach Notification Rule, and Business Associate Agreement coverage.
Prerequisites
Read .metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/00-scope.md. If this file does not exist, tell the user:
Phase 0 (Scope) has not been completed for "$ARGUMENTS". Run
/compliance:regulatory-landscape $ARGUMENTSfirst, or use--skip-checksto bypass.
If --skip-checks is present in $ARGUMENTS, skip this check.
Process
-
Read context files:
- Read
plugins/compliance/shared/grc-lifecycle-guide.mdfor GRC methodology reference - Read
plugins/compliance/shared/assessment-template.mdfor output structure - Read
.metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/00-scope.mdfor scope and control framework context
- Read
-
Entity classification:
- Determine if covered entity (health plan, healthcare clearinghouse, healthcare provider with electronic transactions)
- Determine if business associate (handles PHI on behalf of covered entity)
- Assess hybrid entity considerations
- Document entity classification with rationale
-
Privacy Rule assessment:
- Assess permitted uses and disclosures of Protected Health Information (PHI)
- Evaluate minimum necessary standard implementation
- Review individual rights: access, amendment, accounting of disclosures, restriction requests, confidential communications, right to receive notice of privacy practices
- Assess Notice of Privacy Practices (NPP) content and distribution
- Evaluate authorizations for uses/disclosures not otherwise permitted
- Review de-identification methods (safe harbor vs expert determination)
- Assess marketing and fundraising communication compliance
-
Security Rule assessment:
- Administrative safeguards: security management process (risk analysis, risk management, sanction policy, information system activity review), assigned security responsibility, workforce security, information access management, security awareness training, security incident procedures, contingency plan, evaluation
- Physical safeguards: facility access controls, workstation use, workstation security, device and media controls
- Technical safeguards: access control (unique user ID, emergency access, automatic logoff, encryption), audit controls, integrity controls (mechanism to authenticate ePHI), person/entity authentication, transmission security (integrity controls, encryption)
- Classify each safeguard as required vs addressable
- Score each safeguard: implemented / partially implemented / not implemented
-
Breach Notification Rule assessment:
- Assess breach risk assessment methodology (four-factor test)
- Evaluate individual notification procedures (within 60 days of discovery)
- Assess HHS/OCR notification procedures (within 60 days for breaches affecting 500+ individuals, annual log for smaller breaches)
- Review media notification requirements (500+ in a state/jurisdiction)
- Evaluate breach documentation and investigation processes
-
Business Associate Agreements (BAAs):
- Inventory all business associates handling PHI
- Assess BAA coverage (all BAs have current, compliant agreements)
- Review BAA terms for required provisions
- Evaluate BA monitoring and compliance verification procedures
- Assess subcontractor BAA flow-down requirements
-
Write the artifact to
.metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/01-assess/hipaa.mdfollowing the assessment template structure with:- Entity Classification — covered entity, business associate, or hybrid determination
- Privacy Rule Assessment — use/disclosure controls, individual rights, NPP status
- Security Rule Assessment — administrative, physical, technical safeguard scoring
- Breach Notification Readiness — risk assessment methodology, notification procedures
- BAA Inventory — coverage assessment and agreement adequacy
- Risk Analysis — overall risk posture and highest-risk areas
- Evidence Inventory — existing evidence and evidence gaps
- Remediation Priorities — ranked list of gaps to address
Output
The HIPAA assessment written to .metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/01-assess/hipaa.md. Present a summary to the user highlighting:
- Entity classification determination
- Privacy Rule, Security Rule, and Breach Notification readiness scores
- BAA coverage percentage
- Top 3 gaps requiring remediation