Stablecoin analysis

Skill brainbytes-dev/everything-claude-trading/skills/crypto/stablecoin-analysis

The complete trading and quantitative finance system for Claude Code — 18 agents, 82 skills, 20 commandsFrom the repository description

Install

npx -y skills add brainbytes-dev/everything-claude-trading --skill stablecoin-analysis

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

10 stars10 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

SKILL.md

10.5 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Stablecoin Analysis

When to Activate

Evaluating stablecoin peg mechanisms, reserve compositions, and risk profiles
Assessing depeg risk factors and historical depeg events
Analyzing stablecoin yield strategies and their risk/return characteristics
Comparing stablecoin designs (fiat-backed, crypto-backed, algorithmic)
Monitoring stablecoin market dynamics as macro indicators for crypto markets

Core Concepts

Stablecoin Classification

Fiat-Backed (Custodial):

USDT (Tether) — largest by market cap; reserves include cash, T-bills, commercial paper (reduced), secured loans
USDC (Circle) — fully backed by cash and short-duration US Treasuries; monthly attestations by Deloitte
BUSD (Paxos/Binance) — regulated by NYDFS; being wound down
PYUSD (PayPal) — regulated, backed by US Treasuries and deposits
Peg mechanism: issuer mints/redeems 1:1 with USD; arbitrageurs keep market price near $1
Risks: custodial risk, regulatory risk, reserve composition opacity, banking relationship risk

Crypto-Backed (Decentralized):

DAI (MakerDAO/Sky) — over-collateralized by ETH, WBTC, stablecoins, RWAs
- Minimum collateral ratio: 150% for ETH vaults (liquidation at 145%)
- Stability fee (interest rate) set by governance
- DSR (DAI Savings Rate) provides yield to DAI holders
- Increasingly backed by RWAs and USDC — centralization concerns
LUSD (Liquity) — backed only by ETH, immutable contracts, no governance
- Minimum collateral ratio: 110%
- Redemption mechanism: anyone can redeem LUSD for $1 of ETH from riskiest vaults
- Truly decentralized but smaller scale
crvUSD (Curve) — uses LLAMMA (Lending-Liquidating AMM Algorithm)
- Soft liquidation: gradually converts collateral to stablecoin as price drops
- Re-collateralizes automatically if price recovers
- Novel approach but complex risk profile
Risks: collateral volatility, liquidation cascades, oracle failures, governance attacks

Algorithmic (Uncollateralized or Partially Collateralized):

Historical failures: UST/LUNA (death spiral, $40B lost), IRON/TITAN, Basis Cash
Seigniorage model: mint stablecoin by burning governance token; reflexive — works in expansion, fails in contraction
Fractional-algorithmic: FRAX (partially collateralized, partially algorithmic); has moved toward full collateralization
Risks: death spiral risk (loss of confidence -> redemption -> further depegging -> more redemption)

Peg Mechanisms

Hard Peg (Fiat-Backed):

Market price > $1.00:
  - Arbitrageurs mint new tokens at $1.00 from issuer
  - Sell on market above $1.00
  - Profit drives price back to $1.00

Market price < $1.00:
  - Arbitrageurs buy on market below $1.00
  - Redeem at issuer for $1.00
  - Profit drives price back to $1.00

Requirement: issuer must honor redemptions promptly

Soft Peg (Crypto-Backed):

DAI above $1.00:
  - Governance lowers stability fee (cheaper to mint DAI)
  - More DAI minted and sold, pushing price down
  - DSR can be lowered to reduce DAI demand

DAI below $1.00:
  - Governance raises stability fee (more expensive to hold vaults)
  - Vault holders buy DAI to repay debt, pushing price up
  - DSR can be raised to increase DAI demand
  - Redemption mechanism (if available) provides hard floor

Algorithmic Peg (UST Model — Failed):

UST above $1.00:
  - Mint UST by burning $1 of LUNA
  - Sell UST above $1.00
  - Increases LUNA scarcity (bullish reflexivity)

UST below $1.00:
  - Burn UST to mint $1 of LUNA
  - Sell LUNA on market
  - But selling LUNA crashes LUNA price
  - LUNA crash reduces confidence in backing
  - More UST redemptions -> more LUNA minting -> death spiral

Reserve Analysis

Key Reserve Metrics:

Reserve ratio = total reserves / total stablecoin outstanding
  >1.0: over-collateralized (safe)
  =1.0: fully backed (standard for fiat-backed)
  <1.0: under-collateralized (risky)

Reserve quality:
  Tier 1: Cash, overnight repos, short-term T-bills
  Tier 2: Longer-duration government bonds, money market funds
  Tier 3: Corporate bonds, commercial paper
  Tier 4: Secured loans, other investments, crypto assets

Higher quality = faster liquidation in stress, less mark-to-market risk

Reserve Transparency Hierarchy:

Real-time on-chain proof of reserves (best — crypto-backed stablecoins)
Monthly third-party attestation (USDC by Deloitte)
Quarterly reports (Tether — historically criticized for opacity)
No verification (worst — avoid)

Depeg Risk Factors

Systemic Factors:

Banking crisis affecting stablecoin reserve custodians (USDC/SVB: depeg to $0.87 in March 2023)
Regulatory action against issuer (BUSD ordered to stop minting)
Smart contract exploit draining reserves
Oracle manipulation causing cascading liquidations

Stablecoin-Specific Factors:

Reserve composition degradation (shift from T-bills to riskier assets)
Rapid redemption outflows exceeding liquid reserves
Counterparty risk in reserve custody
Governance attacks on crypto-backed stablecoins
Liquidity fragmentation across chains (bridged USDC ≠ native USDC)

Historical Depeg Events

UST/LUNA (May 2022):

Trigger: large coordinated sell of UST ($300M+) on Curve 3pool
Mechanism failure: LUNA mint/burn created infinite supply as confidence collapsed
Depth of depeg: UST went from $1.00 to $0.02; LUNA from $80 to $0.0001
Loss: ~$40 billion in combined market cap destroyed
Lesson: algorithmic stablecoins without exogenous collateral are inherently fragile

USDC (March 2023):

Trigger: SVB bank failure; Circle had $3.3B of $40B reserves at SVB
Depth of depeg: $0.87 on DEXs, $0.93 on CEXs
Duration: 2 days (Friday evening to Monday morning when Fed backstopped deposits)
Recovery: full repeg after Fed BTFP announcement guaranteed deposits
Lesson: fiat-backed stablecoins carry banking system risk; weekend liquidity gaps amplify depegs

Methodology

Stablecoin Risk Assessment Framework

Classify the peg mechanism — fiat-backed, crypto-backed, or algorithmic
Analyze reserves — composition, quality, transparency, custody
Evaluate redemption mechanism — how quickly can you get $1 back?
Assess regulatory status — licensed? Which jurisdiction? Regulatory actions pending?
Check on-chain liquidity — Curve/Uniswap pool depth, DEX liquidity across chains
Monitor market signals — Curve pool imbalances, DEX premiums/discounts, funding rates
Score and rank — assign risk tier (1-5) across each dimension

Depeg Early Warning Indicators

Watch for:
1. Curve pool imbalance >60/40 (stressed stablecoin becoming dominant in pool)
2. CEX withdrawal suspensions or delays for the stablecoin
3. Issuer communication changes (delays, vagueness, leadership changes)
4. Sustained discount >0.5% for 24+ hours
5. Large redemption queues (on-chain observable for crypto-backed)
6. Social media sentiment shift (FUD can become self-fulfilling)
7. Declining reserves in attestation reports
8. Regulatory announcements targeting the issuer

Stablecoin Yield Strategies

Low risk:
- Supply to Aave/Compound (3-8% APY variable)
- Curve 3pool LP (2-5% base + CRV rewards)
- DSR (MakerDAO savings rate, currently 5-15% depending on governance)

Medium risk:
- Lending on newer protocols with higher rates (higher smart contract risk)
- LP in volatile/stablecoin pairs on DEXs
- Delta-neutral basis trading using stablecoin as collateral

High risk:
- Exotic stablecoin farms on new chains
- Leveraged stablecoin lending loops
- Algorithmic stablecoin incentive programs

Examples

Example 1: USDC Depeg Trade (March 2023)

Situation: USDC trading at $0.93 after SVB news
Analysis:
- Circle's exposure: $3.3B of $40B reserves (8.25%)
- Worst case: 8.25% haircut on reserves -> USDC worth $0.9175
- Best case: deposits recovered -> USDC worth $1.00
- Expected value at $0.93: strongly positive if deposit recovery likely

Trade: Buy USDC at $0.93
- If deposits recovered (70% probability): profit = 7.5%
- If haircut applied (30% probability): loss = 1.4%
- Expected value: 0.7 * 7.5% + 0.3 * (-1.4%) = 4.8%

Outcome: Fed backstopped all deposits. USDC repegged within 48 hours.
7.5% return in 2 days.

Example 2: Curve Pool Imbalance Warning

Monitoring: Curve 3pool composition
Normal state: ~33% DAI / ~33% USDC / ~33% USDT

Warning signal detected:
- DAI: 25%
- USDC: 25%
- USDT: 50%

Interpretation: Market is dumping USDT into the pool, buying DAI/USDC.
This suggests concern about USDT peg or reserves.
USDT discount on Curve: 0.2%

Action:
- Reduce USDT exposure
- Monitor Tether redemption data and reserve attestations
- Set alert for >55% USDT imbalance (escalation threshold)
- Check if discount is also present on other venues (confirms systemic concern vs pool-specific flow)

Example 3: Crypto-Backed Stablecoin Stress Test

DAI stress test scenario: ETH drops 40% in 24 hours

Current state:
- Total DAI: 5B
- ETH-backed DAI: 2B ($4B ETH collateral at 200% CR)
- USDC-backed DAI: 1.5B
- RWA-backed DAI: 1.5B

After 40% ETH drop:
- ETH collateral value: $4B * 0.6 = $2.4B
- Collateral ratio: 2.4B / 2B = 120% (below 150% threshold)
- Liquidations trigger: ~$800M of ETH vaults liquidated
- Liquidation penalty generates revenue but may cascade
- DAI supply contracts as vaults are closed

Assessment:
- USDC and RWA backing provides stability floor (3B backing 3B DAI = 100%)
- ETH liquidation cascade is contained if oracle stays live
- Key risk: oracle failure during ETH crash would prevent liquidations
- DAI should hold peg due to diversified collateral

Quality Gate

Before relying on or investing in stablecoins, verify: