Worktree isolation

Worktree Isolation

Every /team pipeline run operates in one or more isolated git worktrees — one per repository the topic touches. The worktree boundary is at the router level — not per-agent. This means:

1. Parallel pipelines. Multiple /team runs can execute simultaneously without file conflicts. Each gets its own worktree(s).
2. Clean main tree(s). The user's working tree in every involved repo is never polluted by in-progress implementation, test scaffolding, or intermediate commits.
3. Simple agents. No agent needs to know about isolation. They operate in whatever directory the orchestrator hands them.
4. Multi-repo features. A single topic can span repos (e.g. frontend
   • backend + shared types) by listing them in docs/plans/<id>/repos.md. The router creates a worktree in each, branched off the same <id>.

Single-repo (default)

When docs/plans/<id>/repos.md is absent, the topic touches only the home repo (the repo the user invoked /team from). The router creates exactly one worktree using Claude Code's native worktree support:

• Worktree path: <repo>/.claude/worktrees/<id>
• Branch: <id>, branched from the default remote branch (origin/HEAD)
• Cleans up automatically if no changes remain after exit

No custom worktree creation, path management, or teardown logic is needed.

Multi-repo

When docs/plans/<id>/repos.md is present, the topic spans multiple repos. The router creates one worktree per listed repo, all sharing the same branch name <id>:

• For each repo with absolute path <repo-path> in repos.md:
  • Worktree path: <repo-path>/.claude/worktrees/<id>
  • Branch: <id>, branched from that repo's origin/HEAD
  • Created via git -C <repo-path> worktree add .claude/worktrees/<id> -b <id> origin/HEAD
• The home repo's worktree holds the canonical docs/plans/<id>/ artifact directory. The other repos' worktrees do not duplicate the artifacts; agents that need them read from the home worktree's path, which the orchestrator passes in.

After all worktrees are created, the orchestrator appends a ## Worktrees section to repos.md recording the per-repo worktree paths. Any later /team-* invocation rediscovers them by reading that one file.

Claude Code Native Worktrees

For the home repo, Claude Code has built-in worktree support (--worktree <topic> or dispatch into a worktree context). For additional repos in multi-repo mode, the router uses plain git worktree add because Claude Code's native flag only knows about the repo it was launched from. Either mechanism produces a standard git worktree — there is no behavioral difference downstream.

Lifecycle

Setup (router responsibility)

The home worktree is created at the leading WORKTREE phase — phase 1 of 8, before QUESTION (see Why first below for the rationale). The router's responsibilities are:

1. Create the home repo's worktree on branch <id> off origin/HEAD, and author docs/plans/<id>/ inside it — no copy is ever needed because the artifact directory is born in the worktree. (Secondary repos in multi-repo mode get their worktrees after the design gate, once repos.md confirms the repo set; same <id> branch in each.)
2. After this phase, all downstream agent dispatches operate within the appropriate worktree (the home worktree by default; per-repo worktrees when a slice or step carries a [repo: <name>] annotation). The durable inter-agent protocol is the artifact files under the home worktree's docs/plans/<id>/ directory; live coordination uses TodoWrite (session-scoped).

Reusing an existing worktree

If the session is already running inside a linked worktree — any working tree other than the repository's main working tree, detected by the checkout's git dir differing from its common git dir — on a non-default branch, the WORKTREE phase reuses it instead of creating a new one: no new branch, no artifact copy — work continues in place on the current branch. If that worktree is checked out on the default branch (main/master), the phase refuses and stops — implementing directly on the default branch is never acceptable, and nesting worktrees is not supported. See "Detect existing worktree" in skills/team-worktree/SKILL.md for the procedure.

Why first

Worktree creation is the leading phase — it runs first, before QUESTION — for two load-bearing reasons.

First, authoring docs/plans/<id>/ inside the worktree from phase 1 keeps the home checkout's git status clean for the entire run. No intermediate artifacts, test scaffolding, or commits ever touch the main working tree.

Second, a leading worktree gives the recovery hooks a genuine first state to detect: "a worktree exists for <id>, no task.md yet" ⇒ WORKTREE. The phase becomes inferable from the moment the run begins rather than only appearing midway through the pipeline.

For design-gate ergonomics, the orchestrator prints the absolute worktree-rooted design.md path when presenting the design, so the reviewer opens the file cleanly without hunting for the worktree — this supersedes the old "review on the home tree" rationale.

Together these make leading placement a deliberate, articulable choice.

During the pipeline

All agents — researcher, planner, test-architect, implementer, reviewers — run inside whichever worktree the orchestrator hands them for the current slice or step. In single-repo mode that is always the home worktree. In multi-repo mode the implementer changes directory between repos as the plan steps require, committing each slice in the worktree where its files live. Main working trees are never touched.

Ship (teardown)

Opening a PR does not tear down the worktree — the user may need to iterate on the branch (push follow-up commits, address review feedback). Keep the worktree until the PR is merged or the user explicitly asks to remove it. The same holds when commits are kept locally without a PR.

When teardown is warranted (post-merge or on explicit request):

1. For each worktree with commits ahead of its base branch, cherry-pick or rebase commits onto the target branch in that repo, then let Claude Code (or git worktree remove) remove the worktree.
2. Empty worktrees clean up automatically.
3. If manual cleanup is needed: git -C <repo-path> worktree remove <worktree-path> and git -C <repo-path> branch -D <id>.
4. After the worktree is gone, update the repo's local default branch with the merge: git -C <repo-path> pull --rebase origin <base>. Always rebase — never a merge commit — so history stays linear.
5. Remove the feature's local planning docs: rm -rf docs/plans/<id>. These are untracked QRSPI scratch that only existed to drive the work to a merged PR; deleting them is part of teardown, alongside the branch and worktree. Verify the directory is untracked first (git ls-files docs/plans/<id> returns nothing) and remove only that feature's <id> directory — never sibling dirs for other in-flight work.

Gitignored Files

Git worktrees are fresh checkouts — they don't include untracked files like .env or .env.local. To copy these automatically, add a .worktreeinclude file to the project root using .gitignore syntax:

.env
.env.local

Only files matching a pattern that are also gitignored get copied. In multi-repo mode, each repo honors its own .worktreeinclude independently.

Fallback

If worktree creation fails in any repo (shallow clones, certain CI systems):

1. Report the failure for that repo: "Worktree creation failed in <name>. Falling back to main tree for that repo."
2. Continue the pipeline. Other repos still get worktrees; the failing repo's portion of the work runs in its main working tree.
3. If creation fails in the home repo, the orchestrator proceeds with in-place work for the entire pipeline — no isolation, but the pipeline still runs.

Never block the pipeline because worktree creation failed — isolation is a best-practice enhancement, not a hard requirement.