agentsclimarketplace

Resume task

Skill bonnguyenitc/specship/skills/resume-task

A staged spec → plan → coding → review workflow for shipping AI-assisted code. Works with Claude Code, Codex, Cursor & Antigravity.

Install
npx -y skills add bonnguyenitc/specship --skill resume-task

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 2 stars2 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Pick up an in-progress task exactly where it was left off — locate it, report where it stands, and continue from the current stage. Use when returning after a break or context reset, or when asked to "resume", "continue the task", "pick up where we left off", "tiếp tục task", "đang làm tới đâu rồi". Entry point over the stage skills; the interactive counterpart to ship.

SKILL.md

8.9 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Resume Task

Goal: given little or no context, re-enter an existing task — find it, reconstruct where it stands from the on-disk state, and hand off to the right stage skill so work continues without redoing finished stages.

Task state lives on disk (tasks/TASK-<ID>/), not in the chat session — that's exactly what makes resuming possible. This skill turns that durable state back into momentum.

resume-task is an entry point, not a stage: it doesn't produce its own artifact. It reads the shared state, reports it, and invokes the correct stage skill. It's the interactive counterpart to ship — where ship auto-advances every handoff, resume-task resumes one stage and then follows the normal per-stage checkpoints (ask before advancing).

When to use

  • You're starting a fresh session and want to continue a task already underway.
  • After a context reset, an interruption, or switching away and back.
  • The user asks where a task stands, or to "continue / pick up / resume" — and you need to reconstruct state before acting.
  • Not for starting new work (use spec / ship) and not for mapping an unfamiliar codebase (use explore-source).

Shared task state

Part of the task pipeline — see ../WORKFLOW.md for the full contract. resume-task reads the shared state and delegates; the stage skill it invokes does the writing.

  • Hydrate: read tasks/LESSONS.md if present (apply its rules) and the target task's task.md + its artifacts (below).
  • Checkpoint: resume-task writes to task.md only to (a) un-shelve a task it's resuming (flip pausedactive, or move a folder back out of archive/ — see step 1) or (b) repair a missing trace while reconstructing state (see ../WORKFLOW.md → Flow integrity). Both bump updated: and add a dated Pipeline Log line carrying your agent label (format: ../WORKFLOW.md → Agent handoff); it never touches stage/artifacts:. All pipeline checkpointing is the resumed stage skill's job.

Method

Input: an optional task id argument. Accept it in any form — resume-task TASK-20260723-fix-login, resume-task fix-login, resume-task 007 — and normalize to the on-disk folder name (TASK-<ID>): a full TASK-… id is used as written; a bare all-digit argument maps to a legacy numeric folder matched as written (don't re-pad or strip leading zeros — 7 and 007 both resolve to TASK-007 if that's the folder); anything else (a slug fragment like fix-login, or a ticket key like PROJ-123) resolves against tasks/TASK-* and tasks/archive/TASK-* folder names — an exact match (TASK-<argument>) wins, else a unique substring match; several matches → list the candidates and ask. If no argument is given, auto-detect (step 1.2).

1. Locate the task

Resolve which TASK-<ID> to resume, in order:

  1. An explicit id argument (fix-login, 007, TASK-20260723-fix-login, normalized as above) or one named in the conversation. Look in tasks/TASK-<ID>/ first; if not there, check tasks/archive/TASK-<ID>/. If found in neither, list the available tasks and ask — don't start a new one.
  2. Otherwise, scan tasks/TASK-*/task.md and pick the most recently updated: one. Skip tasks/archive/* entirely, and don't auto-pick a status: paused task — shelved tasks resume only when named explicitly. If several active tasks are close, list the candidates (id, title, stage, status, updated:) and let the user choose — don't silently guess.
  3. If tasks/ has no live task, say so (mention any paused/archived ones, resumable by name) and suggest /spec <request> (or /ship) to start one.

Un-shelve before resuming. If the chosen task is shelved, restore it first (get the real time, then log it), then continue. A task can be both archived and paused — apply every step that holds, in this order:

  • archived (found under tasks/archive/) → move the folder back to tasks/TASK-<ID>/, bump updated:, append - <ts> restored from archive.
  • paused (status: paused — check again after any move above) → set status: active, bump updated:, append - <ts> resumed from pause. Leave stage and artifacts: untouched — restoring changes only status/location. After un-shelving, status must be active (or blocked) before you resume — never resume a task still labelled paused.

2. Reconstruct state

Read the chosen task's task.md (frontmatter stage / status / artifacts, the Now block, and the Pipeline Log), then the artifacts that matter for the current stage (spec.md, plan.md, review.md, debug.md). Cross-check that the recorded stage/artifacts match what's actually on disk — if they disagree, that's a missing/stale trace: repair it per the contract before resuming, and record a lesson.

Verify the record against the code, not just against itself — a checkbox is a claim, not proof, and the code may have moved since updated::

  • Spot-check recorded progress: run the most recently ticked S#'s verify: (or the full gate if that's cheaper). Red means the trace lies — the code was reverted, rebased away, or never landed. Un-tick it, repair the trace, record a lesson, and resume from there.
  • Check for drift: if the codebase has changed since the task's updated: (git log since that date), confirm the plan's "Files to Touch" and cited symbols still exist before resuming coding — a plan written against code that has since moved needs a plan refresh first, not a blind resume.
  • Check the working tree: uncommitted changes may be this task's mid-flight work (the Now block may say so, per pause-task) — or another task's. Say which before resuming; don't silently build on top of foreign changes.

3. Report where it stands

Give the user a tight status read before doing anything:

  • Task: id + title, current stage / status.
  • Done: ticked S# / AC#, confirmed/approved artifacts.
  • Blocking: status: blocked, any open blocker Q# in spec.md, open BUG# in debug.md, or review: changes-requested findings — for findings, report the unaddressed (unticked) blocker ones by name; minor ones just get a count.
  • Next: the one concrete action to move forward (the resume point from step 4).

4. Pick the resume point

Derive the next stage from task.md — honor flow integrity (no skipping upstream stages; resolve blockers before advancing):

Current stateResume into
status: blocked / debug: open-bugs (open BUG#)debug — fix to root cause first, then back to the interrupted stage
review: changes-requestedcoding (or debug for a defect) with the Findings as input, then re-run review
stage: spec, spec: draft (or open blocker Q#)spec — finish/confirm it
spec: confirmed, plan missing/draftplan
plan: approved, coding missing/in-progresscoding
coding: done, review missingreview
status: donenothing to resume — report it's complete (and the commit/PR draft in review.md if not yet shipped)

If an upstream artifact a stage needs is missing or not in the required status, run that earlier skill first — never resume ahead silently.

5. Resume

Confirm with the user — e.g. "Task đang ở stage <stage>, tiếp tục với <next> chứ?" — then invoke the resume-point skill via the Skill tool so work continues in the same flow. The invoked stage skill takes over the contract from there (its own hydrate, work, checkpoint, and per-stage "ask before advancing").

  • If the user wants the rest of the pipeline run autonomously instead of stage-by-stage, hand off to ship (it resumes mid-pipeline from the current stage).
  • If the user just wanted a status read, stop after step 3 — don't auto-resume.

Not an external phase

resume-task reconstructs where a task stands and then hands off to the right stage skill — it is the interactive counterpart to ship. An external orchestrator already knows where the task stands (specship inspect TASK-<ID> --json tells it, and next_phase names what to run), so it never launches resume-task; it launches that phase directly. resume-task is never a value of --phase (../WORKFLOW.md → External phase execution). Nothing here changes for interactive users.

When done

resume-task is done once it has handed off to the resume-point skill (or reported a done/empty state). Don't claim any stage's work as finished — that's the resumed skill's job to report.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.