agentsclimarketplace

Bcc breaking coding chaos

Skill bo-cao/breaking-coding-chaos/skills/bcc-breaking-coding-chaos

A human-in-the-loop control plane for reliable agentic coding—plan, challenge, implement, verify, and preserve progress.

Install
npx -y skills add bo-cao/breaking-coding-chaos --skill bcc-breaking-coding-chaos

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

2 things to look at

  • 25 days oldThe repository was created 25 days ago. New is not bad, but a brand new repository carrying a familiar-sounding name is the shape a typosquat arrives in, and there has been no time for anyone else to find a problem with it.
  • 20 stars20 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

BCC main skill: dual-loop coding workflow (throughline → plan-spar → clean-cut) or quick status+next. Slash: /bcc-breaking-coding-chaos · chat: bcc:breaking-coding-chaos · "run BCC" · "BCC status" · "what next BCC". Needs a real idea (1:1 implement). Args: goal text, or status. May pass plan-spar review budget as rounds=N when chaining.

SKILL.md

5.4 KB, ~1.3k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

bcc-breaking-coding-chaos

One main skill + three sub-skills. This file is the only “big” entry; the three children own deep rules.

Sub-skillRole
bcc-throughlineGlobal map: plans.md / progress.md / findings.md only
bcc-plan-sparAfter throughline: single PLAN.md align + review
bcc-clean-cutAfter human APPROVE: minimal code + verify + writeback

Internal notes (not separate slash skills): references/SESSION.md, references/WRITEBACK.md.

Prerequisite: a reasonably concrete idea. BCC is 1:1 implement + control, not ideation from zero.


Shared voice (Mode A and Mode B)

Talk like a sharp collaborator on their work — not a workflow product or ceremony host.

DoDon't
Lead with goal / map / next choice“先对齐上下文 / BCC 双环说明 / 恢复账本” on cold start
Short human gates (confirm hardpoint, APPROVE implement)Unprompted “还没写代码 / throughline 不写产品代码” lectures
Load each child skill and follow its voice rulesDump file-role tables, 5-question grids, skill architecture
Keep process quiet; enforce order silentlySell the next skill every turn

Mode A only chains the same comfortable steps Mode B uses one-by-one — same tone, same gates, less user typing.


Two modes (this skill)

Mode A — full chain

When user says run BCC / full flow / implement this idea end-to-end:

1. bcc-throughline   (create/update map — required first; cold start = start the map, not “resume”)
2. confirm next hardpoint with user (one short question + recommended default)
3. bcc-plan-spar     (grill until clear enough; review budget = rounds if user set it, else plan-spar default)
4. human APPROVE → write .bcc/session.json (see references/SESSION.md)
5. bcc-clean-cut     (code + verify + mandatory writeback)
6. if any hardpoint still open → brief status + next hardpoint or stop
   if ALL throughline hardpoints complete AND wrap-up not yet offered/closed
     → one-shot endeavor wrap-up per bcc-throughline (Gate A+B); else do not re-ask

Thin orchestration only — open each child’s SKILL.md and follow it (throughline user-voice, plan-spar clear-enough + rounds, clean-cut ladder). Do not re-copy grill/review/ladder text here.

Args to forward: if the user passed rounds=N / review=… on the main skill, pass them into bcc-plan-spar for that slice. Grill still has no default Q&A quota.

Mode B — user drives

User calls sub-skills directly. This main skill is optional. Same voice rules as above.

Quick status (built-in — not a separate skill)

When user only wants “where are we / what next” (or args status):

  1. Read plans.md, progress.md, findings.md, PLAN.md, .bcc/session.json if present.
  2. Prefer a short natural answer (goal · now · next · one why). Optional machine block if useful:
BCC status
  goal:     ...
  phase:    ...
  slice:    ...
  PLAN:     missing|draft|locked|complete
  session:  ...
  next:     /bcc-throughline | /bcc-plan-spar | /bcc-clean-cut | ask-user
  why:      <one sentence>
  1. Stop — no grill, no code. If they say “do that next”, load that sub-skill.
Conditionnext
No plans.md / empty goal/bcc-throughline
Need align / lock PLAN/bcc-plan-spar (only if throughline OK)
PLAN approved for code (session or chat)/bcc-clean-cut
All hardpoints complete and no wrap-up offered/closed yetone-shot wrap-up (bcc-throughline Gate A+B)
Wrap-up already offered/closeddo not re-offer (unless user explicitly asks)
Unclearask-user + recommended default

Hard workflow rules (remind only)

  1. throughline before plan-spar
  2. One PLAN.md, updated in place by plan-spar; global progress only in the three throughline files
  3. Human APPROVE before clean-cut (session file optional help); cut freezes PLAN design (progress 约减 only)
  4. Writeback after clean-cut success is mandatory (WRITEBACK.md)
  5. Infer next step from docs + chat; suggest to user — no heavy formal state machine
  6. Plan-spar: grill until clear enough (no default Q&A rounds); rounds budgets auto-review only
  7. Wrap-up only when all throughline hardpoints are complete, and once per cycle (progress/session markers)

What NOT to do

  • Don't install or invent extra slash skills (bcc-status, bare bcc, etc.).
  • Don't implement product code in this skill except by loading bcc-clean-cut.
  • Don't plan-spar without throughline.
  • Don't run Mode A as a long ceremony monologue — same comfort bar as Mode B.

What ships with it: 2 files

6.6 KB alongside SKILL.md

references/

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 327,167. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.