Code review
Build high-quality, portable Claude skills that trigger reliably and deliver real value.
npx -y skills add bjg4/bgskillz --skill code-reviewAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Review pull requests for bugs, security issues, and maintainability with severity-grouped findings. Use when reviewing PRs, diffs, or code changes before merge. Do NOT use for implementing features or writing new code.
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
1.0 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Code Review
Quick start
Read the diff or snippet. Output findings in three buckets: Critical, Major, Minor. Each item: location, issue, suggested fix.
Workflow
- Security first — injection, auth, secrets, unsafe defaults.
- Correctness — logic, null/edge cases, error paths.
- Maintainability — naming, duplication, tests, fit with codebase patterns.
- Performance — only when the change suggests a real concern.
Output template
## Critical
- [file:line] Issue — fix
## Major
...
## Minor
...
Error handling
Missing diff? Ask for git diff output or the file. Out of scope? Say so and stop.