agentsclimarketplace

Cell annotation

Skill BioTender-max/awesome-bio-agent-skills/skills/bioclaw/cell-annotation

Automated and marker-guided single-cell cell type annotation using CellTypist, marker review, reference transfer, and confidence-aware label curation.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add BioTender-max/awesome-bio-agent-skills --skill cell-annotation

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.

SKILL.md

4.5 KB, 998 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Cell Annotation

Version Compatibility

Reference examples assume:

  • scanpy 1.10+
  • celltypist 1.6+
  • pandas 2.2+

Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match the environment:

  • Python: python -c "import scanpy, celltypist; print(scanpy.__version__, celltypist.__version__)"
  • If APIs differ, inspect the installed docs and adapt the pattern instead of retrying unchanged.

Overview

Use this skill when the user wants cluster labels or per-cell labels for scRNA-seq. The default stance is:

  1. inspect markers first
  2. run reference-based annotation
  3. keep uncertainty explicit
  4. export both raw predicted labels and a curated final label column

When To Use This Skill

  • clusters already exist and need biological labels
  • the dataset has a relevant reference atlas or known marker panels
  • the user wants CellTypist or similar automated annotation

Quick Route

  • If clusters are unstable or clearly QC-driven, fix preprocessing before annotation.
  • If the atlas mismatch is severe, prefer broad lineage labels over overconfident fine labels.
  • If multiple methods disagree, mark labels as uncertain instead of forcing a consensus.

Progressive Disclosure

Default Rules

  • Never accept automated labels without checking marker expression.
  • Keep per-cell predictions and cluster-level curated labels separate.
  • Use Unknown, Uncertain, or Ambiguous when evidence is weak.
  • Document the reference model or atlas used.

Expected Inputs

  • processed h5ad with clusters and embeddings
  • marker gene lists or known lineage markers
  • optional reference atlas or model

Expected Outputs

  • results/annotated.h5ad
  • results/cell_labels.tsv
  • results/cluster_annotation_summary.tsv
  • figures/umap_cell_types.pdf
  • figures/marker_dotplot.pdf

Preferred Tools

  • scanpy
  • celltypist
  • pandas
  • matplotlib

Starter Pattern

import scanpy as sc
import celltypist

adata = sc.read_h5ad("results/processed.h5ad")
pred = celltypist.annotate(adata, model="Immune_All_Low.pkl", majority_voting=True)
adata = pred.to_adata()
adata.obs["cell_type_raw"] = adata.obs["majority_voting"]
adata.obs["cell_type_confidence"] = adata.obs["conf_score"]
adata.write("results/annotated.h5ad")

Workflow

1. Inspect markers before automation

Check canonical lineage markers on UMAP, dotplots, or heatmaps. If clusters do not support a plausible biological separation, do not lock in labels yet.

2. Choose the annotation level

  • broad lineage labels when the reference is imperfect
  • fine-grained labels only when markers and reference agree
  • cluster-level labels for noisy or sparse datasets

3. Run reference-based annotation

Use CellTypist or another compatible reference transfer method. Store:

  • raw label
  • confidence score
  • model name

4. Curate with markers and cluster context

Review top markers per cluster and compare them against predicted labels. Rename or collapse labels if fine categories are not robust.

5. Export both raw and final labels

At minimum, keep:

  • cell_type_raw
  • cell_type_confidence
  • cell_type_final

Output Artifacts

  • results/annotated.h5ad
  • results/cell_labels.tsv
  • results/cluster_annotation_summary.tsv
  • figures/umap_cell_types.pdf
  • figures/marker_dotplot.pdf

Quality Review

  • CellTypist conf_score > 0.5 is usually comfortable for a provisional label.
  • 0.2-0.5 should be manually reviewed against markers.
  • < 0.2 should usually remain Unknown or Uncertain unless markers are compelling.
  • Every final label should have either marker support, reference support, or both.

Anti-Patterns

  • assigning fine-grained labels only because the model returned them
  • overwriting raw labels so the original prediction is lost
  • treating low-confidence single-cell labels as publication-ready without review
  • hiding disagreements between marker evidence and reference transfer

Related Skills

  • scRNA Preprocessing And Clustering
  • Cell Communication
  • Trajectory And Lineage

Optional Supplements

  • scanpy
  • scvi-tools

What ships with it: 2 files

2.6 KB alongside SKILL.md

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 325,949. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.