Bio manuscript refine
Skill BioTender-max/awesome-bio-agent-skills/skills/bioclaw/bio-manuscript-refine
A curated collection of AI agent skills for biomedical research, covering genomics, proteomics, single-cell analysis, clinical AI, and protein design.From the repository description
npx -y skills add BioTender-max/awesome-bio-agent-skills --skill bio-manuscript-refineAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
SKILL.md
2.2 KB, 521 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
bio-manuscript-refine
Refine loop: three-reviewer iterative refinement (三审稿人迭代优化)
Run a reviewer-style refinement loop over the manuscript plan using three perspectives: editor, computational reviewer, and biological reviewer.
Purpose
- Review the current manuscript plan
- Produce structured review comments
- Revise the proposal round by round
- Track score history and revision history
Input Format
manuscript_plan: [full manuscript plan generated in previous steps]
target_journal: [target journal, default nat-communications]
num_rounds: [number of refine rounds, default 2]
Workflow
Round 0
- save the initial proposal snapshot
Each review round
Produce three reviews:
- Editor
- novelty
- feasibility
- journal fit
- Computational reviewer
- method design
- technical rigor
- benchmark quality
- implementation feasibility
- Biological reviewer
- biological significance
- analysis design
- dataset suitability
Then generate:
- a review summary
- a revision response
- a refined proposal
Output Format
# Refine Report
## Round 0
- initial proposal snapshot
## Round 1 Reviews
### Editor
- scores:
- key concerns:
### Computational Reviewer
- scores:
- key concerns:
### Biological Reviewer
- scores:
- key concerns:
## Round 1 Revision
- addressed concerns:
- remaining risks:
## Score History
| Round | Editor | Computational | Biological | Overall |
|-------|--------|---------------|------------|---------|
| 0 | ... | ... | ... | ... |
## Final Proposal Status
- ready for next phase / needs more revision
Reviewer Criteria
Editor
- novelty
- feasibility
- journal fit
Computational reviewer
- algorithmic soundness
- method novelty
- benchmark rigor
- code feasibility
Biological reviewer
- biological significance
- analysis relevance
- dataset realism
Usage
/bio-manuscript-refine "manuscript_plan: [path to proposal] | target_journal: nat-communications | num_rounds: 2"
Notes
- Revision should update the proposal itself, not only append comments.
- Keep a full history of each round.
- Scores are guidance, not absolute truth; comments matter more than raw numbers.
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.