agentsclimarketplace

Db optimize

Skill bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS/skills/superskills/db-optimize

全球最大的 Claude Code 技能聚合库 · 收录 3900+ 来自 12+ 来源的技能,提供在线搜索与趋势分析看板 / The world's largest Claude Code skill aggregation hub — 3900+ skills from 12+ sources with online search and trend dashboard

Install
npx -y skills add bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS --skill db-optimize

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

2 things to look at

  • no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
  • 4 stars4 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Database performance audit — detects N+1 queries, missing indexes, join opportunities, slow queries, EXPLAIN analysis, and per-endpoint DB call counts. Use when asked to "optimize the database", "find slow queries", "check for N+1", "analyze query performance", or "audit DB calls".

SKILL.md

5.2 KB, ~1.3k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

/db-optimize

Comprehensive database performance audit: N+1 detection, EXPLAIN analysis, slow query log review, index gaps, join opportunities, and per-endpoint call counts.

Step 1: Check for DBMAP.md

[ -f DBMAP.md ] && echo "DBMAP_EXISTS=true" || echo "DBMAP_EXISTS=false"

If DBMAP_EXISTS=false, tell the user: "No DBMAP.md found. Run /dbmap first to generate a schema map — this audit uses it to cross-reference indexes and table structure."

Step 2: Slow query log

Check if a slow query log exists or can be accessed:

# PostgreSQL — check pg_stat_statements if available
psql "$DATABASE_URL" -c "SELECT query, calls, total_exec_time, mean_exec_time, rows FROM pg_stat_statements ORDER BY mean_exec_time DESC LIMIT 20;" 2>/dev/null || echo "PG_STAT_UNAVAILABLE"

# MySQL — check slow query log location
mysql -e "SHOW VARIABLES LIKE 'slow_query_log%';" 2>/dev/null || echo "MYSQL_UNAVAILABLE"

If neither is available, scan the codebase for query logging output files:

find . -name "*.log" | xargs grep -l "slow\|duration\|query_time" 2>/dev/null | head -5

Report the 10 slowest queries found, sorted by mean execution time. For each: query text (truncated to 120 chars), call count, mean time (ms), total time (ms).

Step 3: EXPLAIN analysis

For each slow query identified in Step 2 (or any query the user provides), run EXPLAIN ANALYZE:

EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS, FORMAT TEXT) <query>;

Interpret the output and flag:

  • Seq Scan on large tables (>1000 rows) — missing index
  • Nested Loop with high row estimates — consider hash join or index
  • Hash Join with high memory usage — consider work_mem tuning
  • Sort without index — consider index on ORDER BY column
  • high actual rows >> estimated rows — stale statistics, suggest ANALYZE <table>

Format findings as:

EXPLAIN: <query summary>
  ⚠ Seq Scan on orders (5,432 rows) — add index on orders.user_id
  ⚠ Sort on created_at — add index on events(created_at)
  ✓ Index Scan on users — OK

Step 4: N+1 detection

Scan the codebase for N+1 patterns:

ORM patterns to flag:

  • A loop containing a DB call (.find, .where, .query, .fetch, .get, .filter, .select)
  • Accessing a relation inside a loop without eager loading (.user, .author, .comments, .items etc. on a model instance inside a loop)
  • Multiple sequential awaits on DB calls inside a loop
# Find loops with DB calls inside
grep -rn "for\|each\|map\|forEach\|loop" --include="*.rb" --include="*.py" --include="*.js" --include="*.ts" --include="*.go" --include="*.java" . | head -5

For each file with loop+query patterns, read the surrounding context and determine if it's a true N+1.

Flag as:

⚠ N+1 DETECTED: app/controllers/orders_controller.rb:45
  Loop over orders calls order.user on each iteration
  Fix: Use includes(:user) / eager_load(:user) / preload(:user)
  SQL impact: 1 query → 1+N queries (N = number of orders)

Step 5: Per-endpoint DB call audit

Scan route handlers / controller actions for query counts:

For each endpoint/action found, count the number of distinct DB calls made:

  • Direct SQL: db.query, connection.execute, pool.query
  • ORM: .find, .findAll, .where, .first, .save, .create, .update
  • Each call inside a loop counts as N calls

Flag any endpoint making more than 3 DB calls as a candidate for optimization:

⚠ HIGH DB CALL COUNT: GET /api/orders (OrdersController#index)
  8 DB calls detected:
    - Order.all (1)
    - order.user (N — N+1 pattern)
    - order.items (N — N+1 pattern)
  Fix: Use a single query with LEFT JOINs or eager loading

Step 6: Join opportunities

Find places where multiple sequential queries fetch related data that could be a single LEFT JOIN:

Pattern: two queries where the second uses IDs from the first result.

💡 JOIN OPPORTUNITY: app/services/dashboard_service.rb:23-31
  Query 1: SELECT * FROM orders WHERE user_id = ?
  Query 2: SELECT * FROM items WHERE order_id IN (...)
  Fix: SELECT o.*, i.* FROM orders o LEFT JOIN items i ON i.order_id = o.id WHERE o.user_id = ?

Step 7: Summary report

Output a prioritized findings report:

## DB Optimization Report

### Critical (fix immediately)
- N+1 queries: X found
- Endpoints with >10 DB calls: Y found

### High Priority
- Slow queries (>100ms mean): Z found
- Missing indexes on FK columns: W found (see DBMAP.md Index Analysis)

### Optimization Opportunities
- JOIN consolidations: V found
- EXPLAIN issues: U found

### Recommended next steps
1. [highest impact fix]
2. [second fix]
3. ...

Ask the user: "Want me to implement any of these fixes now? I can start with the highest-impact items."

What ships with it

Read from the repository

Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 327,069. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.