Trailmark summary

Skill bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS/skills/skills/trailmark-summary

全球最大的 Claude Code 技能聚合库 · 收录 3900+ 来自 12+ 来源的技能，提供在线搜索与趋势分析看板 / The world's largest Claude Code skill aggregation hub — 3900+ skills from 12+ sources with online search and trend dashboard

Install

npx -y skills add bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS --skill trailmark-summary

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

2 things to look at

no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
4 stars4 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Runs a Trailmark summary analysis on a codebase. Returns auto-detected languages, entry point count, and dependency list. Use when vivisect or galvanize needs a quick structural overview. Triggers: trailmark summary, code summary, structural overview.

SKILL.md

3.0 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Trailmark Summary

Runs trailmark analyze --language auto --summary on a target directory.

When to Use

Vivisect Phase 0 needs a quick structural overview before decomposition
Galvanize Phase 1 needs detected languages and entry point count
Quick orientation on an unfamiliar codebase before deeper analysis

When NOT to Use

Full structural analysis with all passes needed (use trailmark-structural)
Detailed code graph queries (use the main trailmark skill directly)
You need hotspot scores or taint data (use trailmark-structural)

Rationalizations to Reject

Rationalization	Why It's Wrong	Required Action
"I can read the code manually instead"	Manual reading misses parser-based language detection, dependency data, and entry point enumeration	Install and run trailmark
"Language detection doesn't matter"	Wrong language selection produces empty or partial analysis	Use Trailmark's parser-based detection or `--language auto`
"Partial output is good enough"	Missing any of the three required outputs (detected languages, entry points, dependencies) means incomplete analysis	Verify all three are present
"Tool isn't installed, I'll skip it"	This skill exists specifically to run trailmark	Report the installation gap instead of skipping

Usage

The target directory is passed via the args parameter.

Execution

Step 1: Check that trailmark is available.

trailmark analyze --help 2>/dev/null || \
  uv run trailmark analyze --help 2>/dev/null

If neither command works, report "trailmark is not installed" and return. Do NOT run pip install, uv pip install, git clone, or any install command. The user must install trailmark themselves.

Step 2: Detect languages with Trailmark's parse API.

python3 - "{args}" <<'PY'
import json
import sys

from trailmark.parse import detect_languages

print(json.dumps(detect_languages(sys.argv[1])))
PY

If the import fails, rerun the same snippet with uv run python - "{args}". If the result is [], report "Trailmark found no supported languages under target" and return.

Step 3: Run the summary with auto-detection.

trailmark analyze --language auto --summary {args} 2>&1 || \
  uv run trailmark analyze --language auto --summary {args} 2>&1

Step 4: Verify the output.

The output must include ALL THREE of:

Detected languages from Step 2
Entrypoints: line from the summary output
Dependencies: line from the summary output

If any are missing, report the gap. Do not fabricate output.

Return the detected language list plus the full Trailmark summary output.

Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most note taking skills give

Counted across 686 of the 876 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-08-06

include a visual element on every slidein 44 of 686, across 13 files
use wikilinks for internal vault linksin 35 of 686, across 11 files
commit to a single visual motif across every slidein 34 of 686, across 9 files
read pptxgenjs guide before creating presentations from scratchin 30 of 686, across 6 files
keep 0.5 inch minimum marginsin 30 of 686, across 7 files
use subagents to visually inspect rendered slidesin 30 of 686, across 6 files
re-verify affected slides after every fixin 27 of 686, across 5 files
run content QA checks before declaring successin 26 of 686, across 3 files
Use Markdown links for external URLs onlyin 26 of 686, across 10 files
pick a bold topic specific color palettein 24 of 686, across 2 files
read editing guide before editing existing presentationsin 23 of 686, across 1 file
use one dominant color across all slidesin 23 of 686, across 1 file

Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once.