Ux audit
全球最大的 Claude Code 技能聚合库 · 收录 3900+ 来自 12+ 来源的技能,提供在线搜索与趋势分析看板 / The world's largest Claude Code skill aggregation hub — 3900+ skills from 12+ sources with online search and trend dashboard
npx -y skills add bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS --skill ux-auditAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 4 stars4 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Perform comprehensive UX audits on pages, components, or features. Use when the user asks to "audit UX", "review usability", "evaluate the interface", "UX review", or wants a systematic evaluation of user experience quality.
SKILL.md
2.3 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
UX Audit Skill
Perform systematic UX audits using Nielsen's heuristics and UX best practices.
When to Use
- Reviewing a page or feature before release
- Identifying usability issues
- Evaluating design decisions
- Comparing against UX standards
- Preparing for user testing
Audit Framework
1. Heuristic Evaluation
Evaluate against Nielsen's 10 usability heuristics:
| Heuristic | Question to Ask |
|---|---|
| System status | Does the user know what's happening? |
| Real world match | Does it speak the user's language? |
| User control | Can users undo/escape easily? |
| Consistency | Does it follow conventions? |
| Error prevention | Does design prevent mistakes? |
| Recognition | Is information visible vs. remembered? |
| Flexibility | Are there shortcuts for experts? |
| Minimalism | Is every element necessary? |
| Error recovery | Are errors clear and recoverable? |
| Help | Is assistance available when needed? |
2. Visual Hierarchy Check
- Is the most important element most prominent?
- Does the eye flow logically?
- Are related items grouped?
- Is there appropriate white space?
3. Interaction Audit
- Are clickable elements obvious?
- Is feedback immediate?
- Are loading states handled?
- Are empty states designed?
4. Content Evaluation
- Is copy clear and concise?
- Is terminology user-friendly?
- Are labels descriptive?
- Are CTAs action-oriented?
Output Format
## UX Audit: [Feature/Page Name]
### Summary Score
[Overall usability rating: Poor / Fair / Good / Excellent]
### Heuristic Scores
| Heuristic | Score (1-5) | Key Issue |
|-----------|-------------|-----------|
### Critical Issues
- [Issue requiring immediate attention]
### Recommendations
| Priority | Issue | Recommendation | Effort |
|----------|-------|----------------|--------|
| P0 | ... | ... | Low/Med/High |
### Positive Patterns
- [What's working well]
Integration
Works best with:
ux-expertagent for deep analysisaccessibility-checkskill for WCAG compliancejourney-mapskill for flow context