Ux audit
Perform comprehensive UX audits on pages, components, or features. Use when the user asks to "audit UX", "review usability", "evaluate the interface", "UX review", or wants a systematic evaluation of user experience quality.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS --skill ux-auditAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 5 stars5 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
2.3 KB, 472 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
UX Audit Skill
Perform systematic UX audits using Nielsen's heuristics and UX best practices.
When to Use
- Reviewing a page or feature before release
- Identifying usability issues
- Evaluating design decisions
- Comparing against UX standards
- Preparing for user testing
Audit Framework
1. Heuristic Evaluation
Evaluate against Nielsen's 10 usability heuristics:
| Heuristic | Question to Ask |
|---|---|
| System status | Does the user know what's happening? |
| Real world match | Does it speak the user's language? |
| User control | Can users undo/escape easily? |
| Consistency | Does it follow conventions? |
| Error prevention | Does design prevent mistakes? |
| Recognition | Is information visible vs. remembered? |
| Flexibility | Are there shortcuts for experts? |
| Minimalism | Is every element necessary? |
| Error recovery | Are errors clear and recoverable? |
| Help | Is assistance available when needed? |
2. Visual Hierarchy Check
- Is the most important element most prominent?
- Does the eye flow logically?
- Are related items grouped?
- Is there appropriate white space?
3. Interaction Audit
- Are clickable elements obvious?
- Is feedback immediate?
- Are loading states handled?
- Are empty states designed?
4. Content Evaluation
- Is copy clear and concise?
- Is terminology user-friendly?
- Are labels descriptive?
- Are CTAs action-oriented?
Output Format
## UX Audit: [Feature/Page Name]
### Summary Score
[Overall usability rating: Poor / Fair / Good / Excellent]
### Heuristic Scores
| Heuristic | Score (1-5) | Key Issue |
|-----------|-------------|-----------|
### Critical Issues
- [Issue requiring immediate attention]
### Recommendations
| Priority | Issue | Recommendation | Effort |
|----------|-------|----------------|--------|
| P0 | ... | ... | Low/Med/High |
### Positive Patterns
- [What's working well]
Integration
Works best with:
ux-expertagent for deep analysisaccessibility-checkskill for WCAG compliancejourney-mapskill for flow context
What ships with it: 1 file
11.5 KB alongside SKILL.md
- skill-report.json11.5 KB