Security engineering
Skill bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS/skills/marketplace/security-engineering
全球最大的 Claude Code 技能聚合库 · 收录 3900+ 来自 12+ 来源的技能,提供在线搜索与趋势分析看板 / The world's largest Claude Code skill aggregation hub — 3900+ skills from 12+ sources with online search and trend dashboard
npx -y skills add bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS --skill security-engineeringAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 4 stars4 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Security architecture and implementation patterns. Use when designing security controls, implementing authentication/authorization, conducting threat modeling, or ensuring compliance with security frameworks.
SKILL.md
5.5 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Security Engineering
Comprehensive security engineering skill covering application security, infrastructure security, compliance, and incident response.
When to Use This Skill
- Designing security architecture
- Implementing authentication and authorization
- Conducting threat modeling
- Security code review
- Implementing compliance controls (SOC2, HIPAA, PCI-DSS)
- Incident response planning
- Security monitoring and alerting
Security Architecture
Defense in Depth
Layer security controls at multiple levels:
| Layer | Controls |
|---|---|
| Perimeter | Firewall, WAF, DDoS protection |
| Network | Segmentation, IDS/IPS, VPN |
| Host | Hardening, EDR, patch management |
| Application | Input validation, secure coding, SAST/DAST |
| Data | Encryption, access control, DLP |
| Identity | MFA, SSO, privileged access management |
Zero Trust Architecture
Core Principles:
- Never trust, always verify
- Assume breach mentality
- Least privilege access
- Micro-segmentation
- Continuous verification
Implementation:
- Identity-based access (not network-based)
- Device health verification
- Continuous authentication
- Encrypted communications everywhere
- Detailed logging and monitoring
Authentication Patterns
OAuth 2.0 / OIDC
Grant Types:
| Grant | Use Case |
|---|---|
| Authorization Code + PKCE | Web/mobile apps |
| Client Credentials | Service-to-service |
| Device Code | CLI tools, IoT |
Token Best Practices:
- Short-lived access tokens (15 min - 1 hour)
- Secure refresh token storage
- Token rotation on use
- Revocation capabilities
Session Management
- Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite cookies
- Session timeout (idle and absolute)
- Session invalidation on logout
- Concurrent session limits
- Session binding to device/IP
Multi-Factor Authentication
- TOTP (authenticator apps)
- WebAuthn/FIDO2 (hardware keys)
- Push notifications
- SMS (last resort, vulnerable to SIM swap)
Authorization Patterns
RBAC (Role-Based Access Control)
Users → Roles → Permissions
Best for: Well-defined organizational hierarchies
ABAC (Attribute-Based Access Control)
If user.department == "engineering" AND
resource.classification == "internal" AND
time.hour BETWEEN 9 AND 17
THEN allow
Best for: Complex, dynamic access requirements
Policy as Code
Use OPA/Rego or Cedar for externalized policy:
- Version controlled policies
- Testable access rules
- Audit trail
- Separation of concerns
Secure Development
OWASP Top 10 Mitigations
| Risk | Mitigation |
|---|---|
| Injection | Parameterized queries, input validation |
| Broken Auth | Strong password policy, MFA, rate limiting |
| Sensitive Data | Encryption, minimal data collection |
| XXE | Disable external entities |
| Broken Access | Authorization checks, default deny |
| Misconfig | Secure defaults, hardening guides |
| XSS | Output encoding, CSP |
| Deserialization | Integrity checks, avoid untrusted data |
| Components | Dependency scanning, updates |
| Logging | Centralized logging, alerting |
Security Testing
SAST (Static Analysis):
- Run on every commit
- Block high-severity findings
- Tools: Semgrep, CodeQL, SonarQube
DAST (Dynamic Analysis):
- Run against staging/dev
- Tools: OWASP ZAP, Burp Suite
Dependency Scanning:
- Check for known vulnerabilities
- Tools: Snyk, Dependabot, npm audit
Secrets Management
Never:
- Commit secrets to git
- Log secrets
- Pass secrets in URLs
- Hardcode secrets
Do:
- Use secret managers (Vault, AWS Secrets Manager)
- Rotate secrets regularly
- Audit secret access
- Use short-lived credentials
Compliance Frameworks
Common Requirements
| Framework | Focus Area |
|---|---|
| SOC 2 | Trust services (security, availability, etc.) |
| HIPAA | Healthcare data protection |
| PCI-DSS | Payment card data |
| GDPR | EU personal data protection |
| ISO 27001 | Information security management |
Key Controls
- Access control and authentication
- Encryption (at rest and in transit)
- Logging and monitoring
- Incident response procedures
- Business continuity planning
- Vendor management
- Employee security training
Incident Response
Response Phases
- Preparation: Runbooks, tools, training
- Detection: Monitoring, alerting, triage
- Containment: Isolate, preserve evidence
- Eradication: Remove threat, patch vulnerabilities
- Recovery: Restore services, verify clean
- Lessons Learned: Post-mortem, improvements
Severity Levels
| Level | Description | Response Time |
|---|---|---|
| P1 | Active breach, data exfiltration | Immediate |
| P2 | Vulnerability being exploited | < 4 hours |
| P3 | High-risk vulnerability discovered | < 24 hours |
| P4 | Security improvement needed | Next sprint |
Reference Files
references/threat_modeling.md- STRIDE methodology and examplesreferences/compliance_controls.md- Framework-specific control mappings
Integration with Other Skills
- cloud-infrastructure - For cloud security
- debugging - For security incident investigation
- testing - For security testing patterns