Safe debug
全球最大的 Claude Code 技能聚合库 · 收录 3900+ 来自 12+ 来源的技能，提供在线搜索与趋势分析看板 / The world's largest Claude Code skill aggregation hub — 3900+ skills from 12+ sources with online search and trend dashboard
npx -y skills add bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS --skill safe-debugAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 4 stars4 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Rigor Debug / Rigor Audit skill for deep learning research work. Use when the user pastes a traceback, terminal error, CUDA OOM, checkpoint load failure, shape mismatch, NaN loss symptom, or training failure and wants conservative diagnosis before any patching, with debug fixes clearly separated from research contributions. Do not use for broad refactoring, speculative adaptation, automatic exploratory patching, or general repository familiarization.
SKILL.md
2.0 KB, 319 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
safe-debug
Use this as the Rigor Debug / Rigor Audit skill. The installed slug remains
safe-debug for compatibility.
Use the shared operating principles in
../../references/agent-operating-principles.md; this skill should guide
conservative diagnosis without blocking the model from finding the local root
cause.
When to apply
- The user provides a traceback, terminal error, or concrete training or inference failure symptom.
- The user wants diagnosis, root-cause narrowing, and minimal patch suggestions before code is changed.
- The user wants a safe debug flow with explicit human approval before mutation.
When not to apply
- When the user wants a broad repository walkthrough without an active failure.
- When the task is speculative experimentation or code adaptation.
- When the user is asking for a large refactor or readability rewrite.
Clear boundaries
- Diagnose first.
- Do not modify repository code by default.
- If a patch is needed, propose the smallest fix and require explicit approval first.
- Escalate savepoint or branch creation before medium-risk or high-risk changes.
- A debug fix is not automatically a research contribution; if it changes experiment meaning or comparability, say so explicitly.
Output expectations
debug_outputs/DIAGNOSIS.mddebug_outputs/PATCH_PLAN.mddebug_outputs/status.json
Notes
Use references/debug-policy.md, ../../references/research-rigor-principles.md, and the shared references/research-pitfall-checklist.md.
What ships with it: 1 file
22.8 KB alongside SKILL.md
- skill-report.json22.8 KB