Deep research
全球最大的 Claude Code 技能聚合库 · 收录 3900+ 来自 12+ 来源的技能,提供在线搜索与趋势分析看板 / The world's largest Claude Code skill aggregation hub — 3900+ skills from 12+ sources with online search and trend dashboard
npx -y skills add bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS --skill deep-researchAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 4 stars4 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Use when the user needs multi-source research with citation tracking, evidence persistence, and structured report generation. Triggers on "deep research", "comprehensive analysis", "research report", "compare X vs Y", "analyze trends", or "state of the art". Not for simple lookups, debugging, or questions answerable with 1-2 searches.
SKILL.md
4.2 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Deep Research
Core Purpose
Deliver citation-tracked research reports through a structured pipeline with evidence persistence, source identity management, claim-level verification, and progressive context management.
Autonomy Principle: Operate independently. Infer assumptions from context. Only stop for critical errors or incomprehensible queries. Surface high-materiality assumptions explicitly in the Introduction and Methodology rather than silently defaulting.
Decision Tree
Request Analysis
+-- Simple lookup? --> STOP: Use WebSearch
+-- Debugging? --> STOP: Use standard tools
+-- Complex analysis needed? --> CONTINUE
Mode Selection
+-- Initial exploration --> quick (3 phases, 2-5 min)
+-- Standard research --> standard (6 phases, 5-10 min) [DEFAULT]
+-- Critical decision --> deep (8 phases, 10-20 min)
+-- Comprehensive review --> ultradeep (8+ phases, 20-45 min)
Default assumptions: Technical query = technical audience. Comparison = balanced perspective. Trend = recent 1-2 years.
Workflow Overview
| Phase | Name | Quick | Std | Deep | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SCOPE | Y | Y | Y | Y |
| 2 | PLAN | - | Y | Y | Y |
| 3 | RETRIEVE | Y | Y | Y | Y |
| 4 | TRIANGULATE | - | Y | Y | Y |
| 4.5 | OUTLINE REFINEMENT | - | Y | Y | Y |
| 5 | SYNTHESIZE | - | Y | Y | Y |
| 6 | CRITIQUE | - | - | Y | Y |
| 7 | REFINE | - | - | Y | Y |
| 8 | PACKAGE | Y | Y | Y | Y |
Note: Phases 3-5 operate as an evidence loop per section (retrieve → evidence store → refine outline → draft → verify claims → delta-retrieve if needed), not as strict sequential gates.
Execution
On invocation, load relevant reference files:
- Phase 1-7: Load methodology.md for detailed phase instructions
- Phase 8 (Report): Load report-assembly.md for progressive generation
- HTML/PDF output: Load html-generation.md
- Quality checks: Load quality-gates.md
- Long reports (>18K words): Load continuation.md
Templates:
- Report structure: report_template.md
- HTML styling: mckinsey_report_template.html
Scripts:
python scripts/validate_report.py --report [path]python scripts/verify_citations.py --report [path]python scripts/md_to_html.py [markdown_path]
Output Contract
Required sections:
- Executive Summary (200-400 words)
- Introduction (scope, methodology, assumptions)
- Main Analysis (4-8 findings, 600-2,000 words each, cited)
- Synthesis & Insights (patterns, implications)
- Limitations & Caveats
- Recommendations
- Bibliography (COMPLETE - every citation, no placeholders)
- Methodology Appendix
Output files (all to ~/Documents/[Topic]_Research_[YYYYMMDD]/):
- Markdown (primary source of truth)
sources.jsonl— stable source registry with canonical IDsevidence.jsonl— append-only evidence store with quotes and locatorsclaims.jsonl— atomic claim ledger with support statusrun_manifest.json— query, mode, assumptions, provider config- HTML (McKinsey style, auto-opened)
- PDF (professional print, auto-opened)
Quality standards:
- 10+ sources, 3+ per major claim (cluster-independent, not just count)
- All factual claims cited immediately [N] with evidence backing in
evidence.jsonl - Claim-support verification mandatory: no unsupported factual claims pass delivery
- No placeholders, no fabricated citations
- Prose-first (>=80%), bullets sparingly
When to Use / NOT Use
Use: Comprehensive analysis, technology comparisons, state-of-the-art reviews, multi-perspective investigation, market analysis.
Do NOT use: Simple lookups, debugging, 1-2 search answers, quick time-sensitive queries.