agentsclimarketplace

Commit work

Skill bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS/skills/marketplace/commit-work

全球最大的 Claude Code 技能聚合库 · 收录 3900+ 来自 12+ 来源的技能，提供在线搜索与趋势分析看板 / The world's largest Claude Code skill aggregation hub — 3900+ skills from 12+ sources with online search and trend dashboard

Install
npx -y skills add bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS --skill commit-work

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

2 things to look at

  • no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
  • 4 stars4 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Create high-quality git commits: review/stage intended changes, split into logical commits, and write clear commit messages (including Conventional Commits). Use when the user asks to commit, craft a commit message, stage changes, or split work into multiple commits.

SKILL.md

2.4 KB, 524 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Commit work

Goal

Make commits that are easy to review and safe to ship:

  • only intended changes are included
  • commits are logically scoped (split when needed)
  • commit messages describe what changed and why

Inputs to ask for (if missing)

  • Single commit or multiple commits? (If unsure: default to multiple small commits when there are unrelated changes.)
  • Commit style: Conventional Commits are required.
  • Any rules: max subject length, required scopes.

Workflow (checklist)

  1. Inspect the working tree before staging
    • git status
    • git diff (unstaged)
    • If many changes: git diff --stat
  2. Decide commit boundaries (split if needed)
    • Split by: feature vs refactor, backend vs frontend, formatting vs logic, tests vs prod code, dependency bumps vs behavior changes.
    • If changes are mixed in one file, plan to use patch staging.
  3. Stage only what belongs in the next commit
    • Prefer patch staging for mixed changes: git add -p
    • To unstage a hunk/file: git restore --staged -p or git restore --staged <path>
  4. Review what will actually be committed
    • git diff --cached
    • Sanity checks:
      • no secrets or tokens
      • no accidental debug logging
      • no unrelated formatting churn
  5. Describe the staged change in 1-2 sentences (before writing the message)
    • "What changed?" + "Why?"
    • If you cannot describe it cleanly, the commit is probably too big or mixed; go back to step 2.
  6. Write the commit message
    • Use Conventional Commits (required):
      • type(scope): short summary
      • blank line
      • body (what/why, not implementation diary)
      • footer (BREAKING CHANGE) if needed
    • Prefer an editor for multi-line messages: git commit -v
    • Use references/commit-message-template.md if helpful.
  7. Run the smallest relevant verification
    • Run the repo's fastest meaningful check (unit tests, lint, or build) before moving on.
  8. Repeat for the next commit until the working tree is clean

Deliverable

Provide:

  • the final commit message(s)
  • a short summary per commit (what/why)
  • the commands used to stage/review (at minimum: git diff --cached, plus any tests run)

Gives 2 of the 12 instructions most pr commit review skills give in 524 tokens

Counted across 888 of the 1,342 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-08-06

  • use conventional commits formathere, and in 123 of 888, across 110 files
  • keep subject line under 72 charactersin 60 of 888, across 46 files
  • delete branches after mergein 50 of 888, across 37 files
  • use imperative mood in subject linein 50 of 888, across 41 files
  • use imperative mood in commit messagesin 45 of 888
  • generate a conventional commit messagein 42 of 888
  • make atomic commitsin 37 of 888, across 25 files
  • run tests before committingin 36 of 888, across 24 files
  • run project test suite to verify clean baselinein 35 of 888, across 7 files
  • run detected project setup commandsin 34 of 888, across 6 files
  • wrap commit body at 72 charactersin 32 of 888, across 25 files
  • split unrelated changes into separate commitshere, and in 32 of 888, across 27 files

Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once. Length counted with cl100k_base; the agent that loads this file may tokenize it differently.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.