Accessibility check
Skill bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS/skills/marketplace/accessibility-check
全球最大的 Claude Code 技能聚合库 · 收录 3900+ 来自 12+ 来源的技能,提供在线搜索与趋势分析看板 / The world's largest Claude Code skill aggregation hub — 3900+ skills from 12+ sources with online search and trend dashboard
npx -y skills add bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS --skill accessibility-checkAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 4 stars4 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Evaluate accessibility and WCAG compliance of UI components and pages. Use when the user asks to "check accessibility", "audit a11y", "WCAG review", "screen reader test", or needs to verify inclusive design practices.
SKILL.md
4.3 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Accessibility Check Skill
Evaluate UI accessibility against WCAG 2.1 guidelines to ensure inclusive design for all users.
When to Use
- Before releasing new features
- Auditing existing interfaces
- Reviewing component libraries
- Ensuring legal compliance
- Improving user inclusivity
WCAG 2.1 Checklist
Level A (Minimum)
Perceivable
- 1.1.1 Non-text Content: Images have alt text
- 1.3.1 Info and Relationships: Semantic HTML structure
- 1.3.2 Meaningful Sequence: Logical reading order
- 1.4.1 Use of Color: Color not sole indicator
Operable
- 2.1.1 Keyboard: All functionality via keyboard
- 2.1.2 No Keyboard Trap: Can navigate away
- 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks: Skip to content link
- 2.4.2 Page Titled: Descriptive page titles
- 2.4.3 Focus Order: Logical tab sequence
- 2.4.4 Link Purpose: Links describe destination
Understandable
- 3.1.1 Language of Page:
langattribute set - 3.2.1 On Focus: No unexpected changes
- 3.2.2 On Input: No unexpected changes
- 3.3.1 Error Identification: Errors clearly described
- 3.3.2 Labels: Form inputs have labels
Robust
- 4.1.1 Parsing: Valid HTML
- 4.1.2 Name, Role, Value: ARIA correctly used
Level AA (Standard Target)
Perceivable
- 1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum): 4.5:1 for text
- 1.4.4 Resize Text: Readable at 200% zoom
- 1.4.5 Images of Text: Avoid where possible
Operable
- 2.4.5 Multiple Ways: Multiple navigation paths
- 2.4.6 Headings and Labels: Descriptive headings
- 2.4.7 Focus Visible: Clear focus indicators
Understandable
- 3.2.3 Consistent Navigation: Same nav location
- 3.2.4 Consistent Identification: Same icons/labels
- 3.3.3 Error Suggestion: Suggest corrections
- 3.3.4 Error Prevention: Confirm destructive actions
Testing Methods
1. Automated Testing
# Using axe-core via Playwright
npx playwright test --grep accessibility
# Using pa11y
npx pa11y http://localhost:5176
2. Manual Keyboard Testing
- Tab through entire page
- Verify focus visibility
- Test Enter/Space activation
- Check Escape closes modals
- Verify arrow key navigation in menus
3. Screen Reader Testing
- Test with VoiceOver (Mac)
- Test with NVDA (Windows)
- Verify announcements make sense
- Check form label associations
4. Visual Testing
- Check color contrast ratios
- Test at 200% zoom
- Verify without color
- Check reduced motion
Output Format
## Accessibility Audit: [Component/Page]
### Compliance Summary
- **Target Level**: WCAG 2.1 AA
- **Current Status**: [Pass / Partial / Fail]
- **Critical Issues**: [count]
- **Warnings**: [count]
### Issues Found
#### Critical (Must Fix)
| Criterion | Issue | Location | Fix |
|-----------|-------|----------|-----|
| 1.4.3 | Low contrast | Button text | Increase to 4.5:1 |
#### Warnings (Should Fix)
| Criterion | Issue | Location | Fix |
|-----------|-------|----------|-----|
### Passing Criteria
- [List of criteria that pass]
### Testing Notes
- Keyboard: [Pass/Fail + notes]
- Screen Reader: [Pass/Fail + notes]
- Color Contrast: [Pass/Fail + notes]
### Recommendations
1. [Priority fix with code example]
Common Fixes
Missing Alt Text
// Bad
<img src="logo.png" />
// Good
<img src="logo.png" alt="LogiDocs Certify logo" />
Missing Form Labels
// Bad
<input type="email" placeholder="Email" />
// Good
<label htmlFor="email">Email</label>
<input id="email" type="email" />
Low Contrast Fix
/* Bad: 2.5:1 ratio */
.button { color: #999; background: #fff; }
/* Good: 4.5:1+ ratio */
.button { color: #595959; background: #fff; }
Focus Indicator
/* Ensure visible focus */
:focus {
outline: 2px solid #16a34a;
outline-offset: 2px;
}
Integration
Works best with:
ux-expertagent for accessibility contextux-auditskill for broader evaluation- Playwright for automated testing