Trial eligibility agent
Skill bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS/skills/awesome-skills/trial-eligibility-agent
全球最大的 Claude Code 技能聚合库 · 收录 3900+ 来自 12+ 来源的技能,提供在线搜索与趋势分析看板 / The world's largest Claude Code skill aggregation hub — 3900+ skills from 12+ sources with online search and trend dashboard
npx -y skills add bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS --skill trial-eligibility-agentAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 4 stars4 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Parse trial protocols and patient data to produce criterion-level MET/NOT/UNKNOWN determinations with evidence and gaps for clinical trial screening tasks.
SKILL.md
2.4 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
At-a-Glance
- description (10-20 chars): Trial triage hub
- keywords: eligibility, ClinicalTrials, FHIR, evidence, gaps
- measurable_outcome: Produce a MET/NOT/UNKNOWN matrix with supporting citations for ≥90% of inclusion/exclusion criteria within 5 minutes per trial request.
Inputs
trial_id(NCT or sponsor ID) plus protocol text if not public.patient_summarynarrative and optionalpatient_structuredFHIR bundle.- Declare data sources used (notes, labs, imaging, meds) to show provenance.
Outputs
- Structured table (JSON recommended) listing each criterion id/text with status, evidence snippet, and confidence.
- Overall recommendation (
potentially_eligible,not_eligible,needs_more_information). - Data gap checklist covering missing labs/imaging/biomarkers.
Workflow
- Acquire protocol: Pull eligibility text from ClinicalTrials.gov or sponsor PDF.
- Normalize criteria: Break into atomic checks with AND/OR logic and thresholds.
- Extract patient facts: Map narrative + FHIR data into canonical features (age, labs, ECOG, biomarkers).
- Evaluate: Assign MET/NOT/UNKNOWN with cited evidence for each criterion, flag missing context explicitly.
- Summarize: Present recommendation and highlight gating unknowns plus next-best actions.
Guardrails
- Never claim enrollment decisions; mark outputs as advisory.
- Cite direct patient evidence for every MET/NOT call; default to UNKNOWN rather than guessing.
- Respect PHI handling expectations—avoid storing raw notes outside secure paths.
Tooling & References
- Use
README.mdfor API snippets (FHIR parsing, JSON schema) and dependency versions. - Pair with
Clinical/Trial_Matching/TrialGPTwhen retrieval/ranking is also needed.