Investor outreach
Skill bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS/skills/awesome-skills/investor-outreach
全球最大的 Claude Code 技能聚合库 · 收录 3900+ 来自 12+ 来源的技能,提供在线搜索与趋势分析看板 / The world's largest Claude Code skill aggregation hub — 3900+ skills from 12+ sources with online search and trend dashboard
npx -y skills add bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS --skill investor-outreachAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 4 stars4 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Draft cold emails, warm intro blurbs, follow-ups, update emails, and investor communications for fundraising. Use when the user wants outreach to angels, VCs, strategic investors, or accelerators and needs concise, personalized, investor-facing messaging.
SKILL.md
2.1 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Investor Outreach
Write investor communication that is short, personalized, and easy to act on.
When to Activate
- writing a cold email to an investor
- drafting a warm intro request
- sending follow-ups after a meeting or no response
- writing investor updates during a process
- tailoring outreach based on fund thesis or partner fit
Core Rules
- Personalize every outbound message.
- Keep the ask low-friction.
- Use proof, not adjectives.
- Stay concise.
- Never send generic copy that could go to any investor.
Cold Email Structure
- subject line: short and specific
- opener: why this investor specifically
- pitch: what the company does, why now, what proof matters
- ask: one concrete next step
- sign-off: name, role, one credibility anchor if needed
Personalization Sources
Reference one or more of:
- relevant portfolio companies
- a public thesis, talk, post, or article
- a mutual connection
- a clear market or product fit with the investor's focus
If that context is missing, ask for it or state that the draft is a template awaiting personalization.
Follow-Up Cadence
Default:
- day 0: initial outbound
- day 4-5: short follow-up with one new data point
- day 10-12: final follow-up with a clean close
Do not keep nudging after that unless the user wants a longer sequence.
Warm Intro Requests
Make life easy for the connector:
- explain why the intro is a fit
- include a forwardable blurb
- keep the forwardable blurb under 100 words
Post-Meeting Updates
Include:
- the specific thing discussed
- the answer or update promised
- one new proof point if available
- the next step
Quality Gate
Before delivering:
- message is personalized
- the ask is explicit
- there is no fluff or begging language
- the proof point is concrete
- word count stays tight
Gives 5 of the 12 instructions most sales crm skills give
Counted across 361 of the 361 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-08-06
- Read product marketing context before writing if it existsin 22 of 361, across 14 files
- keep the ask low-frictionhere, and in 16 of 361, across 7 files
- Call RUBE_SEARCH_TOOLS firstin 15 of 361, across 5 files
- personalize every outbound messagehere, and in 13 of 361, across 4 files
- confirm connection status is activein 13 of 361, across 4 files
- Keep forwardable blurbs under 100 wordshere, and in 13 of 361, across 4 files
- State if personalization context is missinghere, and in 13 of 361, across 4 files
- Cut any sentence that does not drive a replyin 13 of 361, across 4 files
- Use proof instead of adjectiveshere, and in 12 of 361, across 3 files
- Use a single, low-friction call to actionin 12 of 361, across 4 files
- Calibrate tone to the specific audiencein 12 of 361, across 3 files
- Make each follow-up email add new valuein 12 of 361, across 6 files
Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once.