Rag perf
全球最大的 Claude Code 技能聚合库 · 收录 3900+ 来自 12+ 来源的技能,提供在线搜索与趋势分析看板 / The world's largest Claude Code skill aggregation hub — 3900+ skills from 12+ sources with online search and trend dashboard
npx -y skills add bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS --skill rag-perfAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 4 stars4 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
NVIDIA RAG Blueprint performance-tuning guidance for profiling retrieval stacks, comparing bottlenecks, and validating latency or throughput improvements.
The file declares its own license as Apache-2.0. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
17.3 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
RAG-Perf — config-driven perf benchmark CLI
Purpose
Drive a deployed NVIDIA RAG Blueprint server with a YAML config, run a server-side profiling pass (per-stage timing, citation quality, bottleneck inference) and an optional aiperf load test (TTFT / E2E / token & request throughput / error rate), and write a unified report. The CLI is intentionally minimal: rag-perf -c <config> plus --help / --version. Behaviour is fully config-driven; field variations belong in YAML.
Scope
- Accuracy / RAGAS scoring of answer quality → use the rag-eval skill.
- Deploying, repairing, or configuring services (compose, helm, NIM env vars) → use the rag-blueprint skill.
- Production monitoring / alerting — rag-perf is a one-shot benchmark tool.
- Runtime requirement: a deployed RAG server reachable on the network.
Prerequisites
- Repo cloned; run commands from the repo root (config paths in the presets are repo-root-relative).
- Python 3.11+ and uv on PATH.
- Install rag-perf into its own uv-managed venv:
uv sync --project scripts/rag-perf. - For unit tests: install dev extras as well —
uv sync --project scripts/rag-perf --extra dev(otherwisepytest-asynciois missing and async tests error out at collection time). - A reachable RAG server (default
http://localhost:8081). For the aiperf phase, the bundlednvidia_ragendpoint plugin must be installed —pip install -e ./scripts/rag-perfregisters it via theaiperf.pluginsentry point. - For synthetic queries: an OpenAI-compatible chat-completions endpoint reachable at
synthetic.llm_url(defaulthttp://localhost:8999/v1/chat/completions). - rag-perf itself runs without
NVIDIA_API_KEY(unlike rag-eval). The synthetic LLM endpoint may require its own auth — that's the deployment's concern.
Instructions
-
Pick a preset. The three under
scripts/rag-perf/configs/are:quick_profile.yaml— profile-only, ~30 s. Skips load test. For fast iteration on retrieval / reranker tuning.single_run.yaml— one concurrency level, profiling + aiperf, ~2 min. Regression checks.sweep.yaml— multi-axis sweep.load.concurrency,rag.vdb_top_k,rag.reranker_top_kare allint | list[int]; any of them as a list becomes a sweep axis (Cartesian product).
-
Edit the preset. Required: replace
rag.collection_names: ["<collection_name>"]with a real collection on the deployed ingestor server. Verify the collection exists viaGET /v1/collectionson the ingestor. The placeholder<collection_name>validates fine but every request will fail at retrieval. Use a copied YAML preset for variants; the CLI surface is intentionally config-only. -
Run. From repo root:
uv run --project scripts/rag-perf rag-perf -c scripts/rag-perf/configs/single_run.yamlSame form for the other presets. The CLI accepts only
-c / --config(required),--help,--version. -
Read stdout. Every invocation prints, in order: a startup banner, a one-line summary, the fully resolved config as YAML (so the run is reproducible from terminal output), per-grid-point progress with the shlex-joined aiperf command in copy-pastable form, a rich per-point summary table (stage breakdown with bars, citation quality, bottleneck, load-test block), and finally a side-by-side comparison table auto-labelled by whichever axis varied. See
references/output-and-analysis.md. -
Inspect artifacts. Layout depends on run shape — flat for single-point +
iterations=1, nested underiter_<i>/<point>/...otherwise. Seereferences/output-and-analysis.mdfor the full directory tree, file purposes, and how to parseresults.json/results.csv/report.md. -
Summarise for the user. When reporting back, follow the playbook in
references/output-and-analysis.md#summarising-results-to-the-user: pick the canonical result file for the run shape, build a headline table (concurrency × top-k axes × TTFT × throughput × bottleneck × citation quality), compute scaling efficiency on sweeps, always flag zero citations / non-zero error rate / suspectllm_ttft_ms/ small-sample p99, and propose a concrete next-experiment YAML. -
Tune. Schema is fully documented in
docs/performance-benchmarking.mdand the deeper-dive references below. Common knobs: turnaiperf.enabled: falsefor profile-only mode, increaseload.iterationsfor variance estimation, setload.sleep_between_points_s: 60for overnight Cartesian sweeps.
Examples
Profile-only (quickest signal on retrieval / reranker tuning):
uv run --project scripts/rag-perf rag-perf -c scripts/rag-perf/configs/quick_profile.yaml
Output: rag-perf-results/quick_profile/run_<ts>/{profile_report.md, profile_results.json, profiling/}. The aiperf_rag_on/ directory is omitted. Filenames are profile_* because aiperf.enabled: false.
Single benchmark point with full report:
uv run --project scripts/rag-perf rag-perf -c scripts/rag-perf/configs/single_run.yaml
Output: flat run_<ts>/{report.md, results.json, results.csv, profiling/, aiperf_rag_on/}.
Concurrency sweep:
uv run --project scripts/rag-perf rag-perf -c scripts/rag-perf/configs/sweep.yaml
Output: nested run_<ts>/iter_1/<CR:_VDB-K:_RERANKER-K:_…>/{profiling,aiperf_rag_on}/ per point, plus aggregate report.md / results.json / results.csv at the run root.
Run unit tests:
uv sync --project scripts/rag-perf --extra dev # one-time, installs pytest-asyncio
uv run --project scripts/rag-perf python -m pytest tests/unit/test_rag_perf/
Limitations
- The CLI is config-only: author or copy YAML to vary a parameter.
load.concurrency/rag.vdb_top_k/rag.reranker_top_kacceptint | list[int]; the validator requires unique list values because each value names a unique point dir.input.fileandinput.syntheticfollow an XOR rule — both set fails validation. When neither is set,syntheticauto-fills with defaults so a bare config still validates.- File-based input format is inferred from extension only (
.jsonlor.csv); other extensions are rejected. - Synthetic generation streams each query to disk as it completes (failure-resilient) but fails fast on the first LLM error — partial JSONL is preserved. Re-run after fixing the endpoint.
- Reasoning models (Nemotron Omni, Qwen-Reasoning) require
synthetic.disable_thinking: true(the default). Without it the model exhausts the token budget on chain-of-thought andcontentreturns empty — the generator now raises with a clear message instead of substitutingreasoning_contentfor the answer. - aiperf-specific knobs outside the YAML surface (request rate distribution, GPU telemetry config, etc.) require editing
AiperfRunner._base_aiperf_cmdinscripts/rag-perf/rag_perf/runner.py. - Procedural detail lives under
references/to keep this file concise.
Troubleshooting
| Error / signal | Likely cause | What to do |
|---|---|---|
Configuration errors in <yaml>: • input — ... XOR rule | Both input.file and input.synthetic set | Pick one. The XOR validator runs at YAML load time. |
input.file must end in .jsonl or .csv | Extension other than .jsonl / .csv | Rename or convert. |
load.concurrency has duplicate values | e.g. [2, 2, 4] | Each concurrency maps to a unique point dir; dedupe. |
warmup_requests must be >= 1 | YAML had warmup_requests: 0 | aiperf rejects warmup=0; minimum is 1. |
LLM returned empty content (reasoning_content was populated — model exhausted its budget on chain-of-thought; raise min_query_tokens or set synthetic.disable_thinking=true). | Reasoning model used CoT and ran out of tokens | Set synthetic.disable_thinking: true (the default) or raise min_query_tokens. |
✗ All N profiling requests failed across M point(s). + exit 1 | Bad URL, server down, wrong collection | Verify target.url, rag.collection_names (the <collection_name> placeholder will hit this). |
Per-iteration ⚠ N profiling requests failed warning, run continues | Some requests timed out / errored mid-run | Check rag-server logs, raise target.timeout_s, drop concurrency. |
RuntimeError: Random synthetic query generation failed at query N: ... | LLM endpoint rejected a request mid-generation | Partial JSONL is at synthetic.jsonl_output_path; fix endpoint and re-run with reduced num_queries, or point input.file at the partial file. |
Citation count (mean): 0 and Citation relevance score: N/A for a non-empty deployment | Collection mismatch between rag.collection_names and what's actually ingested | Run curl -s http://<ingestor>:8082/v1/collections to list real collections. |
Tests error with ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pytest_asyncio' | Dev extras missing | uv sync --project scripts/rag-perf --extra dev. |
CI: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'ruamel' from tests/unit/test_rag_perf/ | rag-perf package missing from CI venv | Add uv pip install -e ./scripts/rag-perf after the top-level install in the unit-tests job. |
Gotchas
- Run from repo root. Preset configs reference
scripts/rag-perf/examples/queries.jsonlandscripts/rag-perf/prompts/default_prompts.yamlwith repo-root-relative paths. Running from insidescripts/rag-perf/will fail those file lookups. - CLI is config-only. Edit the YAML or copy a preset for URL, concurrency, collection, and similar fields.
- Always edit
rag.collection_namesbefore the first run. The presets ship with["<collection_name>"]as a deliberate placeholder. Validation passes, retrieval fails silently for every request — manifests asCitation count (mean): 0everywhere. load.concurrency_list,rag.vdb_top_k_list,rag.reranker_top_k_listare read-only properties that normalise scalar-or-list to a list. Use them when reasoning about the grid; the underlying YAML field is whatever the user wrote.aiperf.enabled: falsechanges filenames. The top-level outputs becomeprofile_report.md/profile_results.json/profile_results.csv. The aggregate sweep table also suppresses load-test rows and the "Optimal throughput" footer.- Resolved-config dump is verbose (50+ lines) — expected. It's what makes terminal output a self-contained reproducer; don't filter it out in scripts.
- The aiperf shell command is logged before each subprocess. Look for
\n $ python -m aiperf profile -m ... --endpoint-type nvidia_rag ...in stdout — copy-paste runnable for reproducing a single point outside rag-perf. --endpoint-type nvidia_ragcomes from the bundled plugin atscripts/rag-perf/rag_perf/plugin/nvidia_rag.py. It teaches aiperf about the RAG/v1/generaterequest shape and parses citations + per-stagemetricsout of the SSE stream. If aiperf can't resolvenvidia_rag, rag-perf needs editable installation in the venv — re-runuv sync --project scripts/rag-perf(oruv pip install -e ./scripts/rag-perf).- Sweep-mode point-name collision. When two points differ only in concurrency (e.g.
[1, 4]× singlevdb_top_k), the dir name encodes everything:CR:1_ISL:50_OSL:512_VDB-K:20_RERANKER-K:4_Model:.... Cluster / GPU / experiment_name (output.cluster,output.gpu,output.experiment_name) are appended too — useful for diff-friendly artifact paths across machines. load.iterations > 1repeats the entire grid. Each repetition writes to its owniter_<i>/. Aggregate CSV row count =n_points × iterations.
Source of truth
| Piece | Location |
|---|---|
| Driver | scripts/rag-perf/rag_perf/cli.py (main is the single Click command) |
| Schema | scripts/rag-perf/rag_perf/config.py (RunConfig and sub-models) |
| Orchestrator | scripts/rag-perf/rag_perf/runner.py (BenchmarkRunner.run, RagProfiler, AiperfRunner) |
| aiperf plugin | scripts/rag-perf/rag_perf/plugin/nvidia_rag.py |
| User-facing doc | docs/performance-benchmarking.md |
| Presets | scripts/rag-perf/configs/{quick_profile,single_run,sweep}.yaml |
| Sample queries | scripts/rag-perf/examples/queries.jsonl |
| Synthetic prompts | scripts/rag-perf/prompts/default_prompts.yaml |
| Config schema details | references/config-schema.md |
| Synthetic-query generation | references/synthetic-generation.md |
| Output layout & metric semantics | references/output-and-analysis.md |
Agent playbook
- Sync deps:
uv sync --project scripts/rag-perf(one-time per checkout). - Pick & customise a preset: copy
scripts/rag-perf/configs/<preset>.yamlif you want a variant; always setrag.collection_namesto a real collection. - Run:
uv run --project scripts/rag-perf rag-perf -c <config>from repo root. - Read the per-point + aggregate tables on stdout. Bottleneck inference is in the per-point profiling section; comparison across points is the final aggregate table.
- Parse artifacts under
output.dir/run_<ts>/— seereferences/output-and-analysis.md. For multi-point runs,results.csvhas one row per (point × iteration). - Summarise for the user using the playbook in
references/output-and-analysis.md#summarising-results-to-the-user— headline table, scaling-efficiency math for sweeps, mandatory flags for zero citations / non-zero errors / suspectllm_ttft_ms/ low sample size, and a concrete next-experiment YAML. - Tune retrieval / reranker: flip to
quick_profile.yamloraiperf.enabled: falsefor fast iteration, then return tosingle_run.yaml/sweep.yamlwhen characterising under load. - Triage failures: see Troubleshooting above and
references/output-and-analysis.mdfor empty-citation / bottleneck=N/A patterns.
Anti-Patterns
- Optimizing before recording a baseline: Without a starting point, there is no trustworthy performance story.
- Using toy traffic to justify production tuning: Tiny prompts or empty corpora hide the real bottleneck.
- Accepting lower answer quality as an untracked side effect of a latency win.
Verification Protocol
Before claiming "skill applied successfully":
- Pass/fail: The performance investigation starts from a named baseline and a concrete bottleneck hypothesis.
- Pass/fail: The workload shape, corpus size, and concurrency assumptions match the path being optimized.
- Pass/fail: Any latency or throughput claim is paired with a correctness or quality guardrail.
- Pressure-test scenario: Re-run the workflow on a retrieval stack that speeds up only because caching masked a stale index.
- Success metric: The user gets a reproducible benchmark path and a tuning change that improves the intended metric without hidden regressions.
Cross-Client Portability
This skill is written to stay usable across GitHub Copilot, Claude Code, and Codex.
- GitHub Copilot: keep the folder in a Copilot-visible skill path or wrap the workflow in project instructions when folder discovery is unavailable.
- Claude Code: keep the folder in a local skills directory or a compatible plugin source.
- Codex: install or sync the folder into
$CODEX_HOME/skills/rag-perfand restart Codex after major changes.
MCP Availability And Fallback
Preferred MCP Server: None required
- Fallback prompt: "Use the rag-perf skill without MCP. Rely on the local
SKILL.md, bundled references or scripts, and manual verification. Show the exact commands, evidence, and final checks you used before concluding." - If the current host does not expose a matching server, use the bundled references, scripts, native toolchain, and manual workflow already described in this skill.
- Treat direct local verification, rendered output, logs, tests, or screenshots as the fallback evidence path before completion.
Related Skills
- devops-tooling: Use it when the performance work also needs container, CI, or infrastructure diagnostics.
- cloud-design-patterns: Use it when bottlenecks reveal larger scaling or architecture tradeoffs.
- documentation-verification: Use it when benchmark claims must be published or preserved in repo docs.