agentsclimarketplace

Rag perf

Skill bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS/skills/agent-skills/rag-perf

全球最大的 Claude Code 技能聚合库 · 收录 3900+ 来自 12+ 来源的技能,提供在线搜索与趋势分析看板 / The world's largest Claude Code skill aggregation hub — 3900+ skills from 12+ sources with online search and trend dashboard

Install
npx -y skills add bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS --skill rag-perf

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

2 things to look at

  • no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
  • 4 stars4 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

NVIDIA RAG Blueprint performance-tuning guidance for profiling retrieval stacks, comparing bottlenecks, and validating latency or throughput improvements.

The file declares its own license as Apache-2.0. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.

SKILL.md

17.3 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

RAG-Perf — config-driven perf benchmark CLI

Purpose

Drive a deployed NVIDIA RAG Blueprint server with a YAML config, run a server-side profiling pass (per-stage timing, citation quality, bottleneck inference) and an optional aiperf load test (TTFT / E2E / token & request throughput / error rate), and write a unified report. The CLI is intentionally minimal: rag-perf -c <config> plus --help / --version. Behaviour is fully config-driven; field variations belong in YAML.

Scope

  • Accuracy / RAGAS scoring of answer quality → use the rag-eval skill.
  • Deploying, repairing, or configuring services (compose, helm, NIM env vars) → use the rag-blueprint skill.
  • Production monitoring / alerting — rag-perf is a one-shot benchmark tool.
  • Runtime requirement: a deployed RAG server reachable on the network.

Prerequisites

  • Repo cloned; run commands from the repo root (config paths in the presets are repo-root-relative).
  • Python 3.11+ and uv on PATH.
  • Install rag-perf into its own uv-managed venv: uv sync --project scripts/rag-perf.
  • For unit tests: install dev extras as well — uv sync --project scripts/rag-perf --extra dev (otherwise pytest-asyncio is missing and async tests error out at collection time).
  • A reachable RAG server (default http://localhost:8081). For the aiperf phase, the bundled nvidia_rag endpoint plugin must be installed — pip install -e ./scripts/rag-perf registers it via the aiperf.plugins entry point.
  • For synthetic queries: an OpenAI-compatible chat-completions endpoint reachable at synthetic.llm_url (default http://localhost:8999/v1/chat/completions).
  • rag-perf itself runs without NVIDIA_API_KEY (unlike rag-eval). The synthetic LLM endpoint may require its own auth — that's the deployment's concern.

Instructions

  1. Pick a preset. The three under scripts/rag-perf/configs/ are:

    • quick_profile.yaml — profile-only, ~30 s. Skips load test. For fast iteration on retrieval / reranker tuning.
    • single_run.yaml — one concurrency level, profiling + aiperf, ~2 min. Regression checks.
    • sweep.yaml — multi-axis sweep. load.concurrency, rag.vdb_top_k, rag.reranker_top_k are all int | list[int]; any of them as a list becomes a sweep axis (Cartesian product).
  2. Edit the preset. Required: replace rag.collection_names: ["<collection_name>"] with a real collection on the deployed ingestor server. Verify the collection exists via GET /v1/collections on the ingestor. The placeholder <collection_name> validates fine but every request will fail at retrieval. Use a copied YAML preset for variants; the CLI surface is intentionally config-only.

  3. Run. From repo root:

    uv run --project scripts/rag-perf rag-perf -c scripts/rag-perf/configs/single_run.yaml
    

    Same form for the other presets. The CLI accepts only -c / --config (required), --help, --version.

  4. Read stdout. Every invocation prints, in order: a startup banner, a one-line summary, the fully resolved config as YAML (so the run is reproducible from terminal output), per-grid-point progress with the shlex-joined aiperf command in copy-pastable form, a rich per-point summary table (stage breakdown with bars, citation quality, bottleneck, load-test block), and finally a side-by-side comparison table auto-labelled by whichever axis varied. See references/output-and-analysis.md.

  5. Inspect artifacts. Layout depends on run shape — flat for single-point + iterations=1, nested under iter_<i>/<point>/... otherwise. See references/output-and-analysis.md for the full directory tree, file purposes, and how to parse results.json / results.csv / report.md.

  6. Summarise for the user. When reporting back, follow the playbook in references/output-and-analysis.md#summarising-results-to-the-user: pick the canonical result file for the run shape, build a headline table (concurrency × top-k axes × TTFT × throughput × bottleneck × citation quality), compute scaling efficiency on sweeps, always flag zero citations / non-zero error rate / suspect llm_ttft_ms / small-sample p99, and propose a concrete next-experiment YAML.

  7. Tune. Schema is fully documented in docs/performance-benchmarking.md and the deeper-dive references below. Common knobs: turn aiperf.enabled: false for profile-only mode, increase load.iterations for variance estimation, set load.sleep_between_points_s: 60 for overnight Cartesian sweeps.

Examples

Profile-only (quickest signal on retrieval / reranker tuning):

uv run --project scripts/rag-perf rag-perf -c scripts/rag-perf/configs/quick_profile.yaml

Output: rag-perf-results/quick_profile/run_<ts>/{profile_report.md, profile_results.json, profiling/}. The aiperf_rag_on/ directory is omitted. Filenames are profile_* because aiperf.enabled: false.

Single benchmark point with full report:

uv run --project scripts/rag-perf rag-perf -c scripts/rag-perf/configs/single_run.yaml

Output: flat run_<ts>/{report.md, results.json, results.csv, profiling/, aiperf_rag_on/}.

Concurrency sweep:

uv run --project scripts/rag-perf rag-perf -c scripts/rag-perf/configs/sweep.yaml

Output: nested run_<ts>/iter_1/<CR:_VDB-K:_RERANKER-K:_…>/{profiling,aiperf_rag_on}/ per point, plus aggregate report.md / results.json / results.csv at the run root.

Run unit tests:

uv sync --project scripts/rag-perf --extra dev   # one-time, installs pytest-asyncio
uv run --project scripts/rag-perf python -m pytest tests/unit/test_rag_perf/

Limitations

  • The CLI is config-only: author or copy YAML to vary a parameter.
  • load.concurrency / rag.vdb_top_k / rag.reranker_top_k accept int | list[int]; the validator requires unique list values because each value names a unique point dir.
  • input.file and input.synthetic follow an XOR rule — both set fails validation. When neither is set, synthetic auto-fills with defaults so a bare config still validates.
  • File-based input format is inferred from extension only (.jsonl or .csv); other extensions are rejected.
  • Synthetic generation streams each query to disk as it completes (failure-resilient) but fails fast on the first LLM error — partial JSONL is preserved. Re-run after fixing the endpoint.
  • Reasoning models (Nemotron Omni, Qwen-Reasoning) require synthetic.disable_thinking: true (the default). Without it the model exhausts the token budget on chain-of-thought and content returns empty — the generator now raises with a clear message instead of substituting reasoning_content for the answer.
  • aiperf-specific knobs outside the YAML surface (request rate distribution, GPU telemetry config, etc.) require editing AiperfRunner._base_aiperf_cmd in scripts/rag-perf/rag_perf/runner.py.
  • Procedural detail lives under references/ to keep this file concise.

Troubleshooting

Error / signalLikely causeWhat to do
Configuration errors in <yaml>: • input — ... XOR ruleBoth input.file and input.synthetic setPick one. The XOR validator runs at YAML load time.
input.file must end in .jsonl or .csvExtension other than .jsonl / .csvRename or convert.
load.concurrency has duplicate valuese.g. [2, 2, 4]Each concurrency maps to a unique point dir; dedupe.
warmup_requests must be >= 1YAML had warmup_requests: 0aiperf rejects warmup=0; minimum is 1.
LLM returned empty content (reasoning_content was populated — model exhausted its budget on chain-of-thought; raise min_query_tokens or set synthetic.disable_thinking=true).Reasoning model used CoT and ran out of tokensSet synthetic.disable_thinking: true (the default) or raise min_query_tokens.
✗ All N profiling requests failed across M point(s). + exit 1Bad URL, server down, wrong collectionVerify target.url, rag.collection_names (the <collection_name> placeholder will hit this).
Per-iteration ⚠ N profiling requests failed warning, run continuesSome requests timed out / errored mid-runCheck rag-server logs, raise target.timeout_s, drop concurrency.
RuntimeError: Random synthetic query generation failed at query N: ...LLM endpoint rejected a request mid-generationPartial JSONL is at synthetic.jsonl_output_path; fix endpoint and re-run with reduced num_queries, or point input.file at the partial file.
Citation count (mean): 0 and Citation relevance score: N/A for a non-empty deploymentCollection mismatch between rag.collection_names and what's actually ingestedRun curl -s http://<ingestor>:8082/v1/collections to list real collections.
Tests error with ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pytest_asyncio'Dev extras missinguv sync --project scripts/rag-perf --extra dev.
CI: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'ruamel' from tests/unit/test_rag_perf/rag-perf package missing from CI venvAdd uv pip install -e ./scripts/rag-perf after the top-level install in the unit-tests job.

Gotchas

  • Run from repo root. Preset configs reference scripts/rag-perf/examples/queries.jsonl and scripts/rag-perf/prompts/default_prompts.yaml with repo-root-relative paths. Running from inside scripts/rag-perf/ will fail those file lookups.
  • CLI is config-only. Edit the YAML or copy a preset for URL, concurrency, collection, and similar fields.
  • Always edit rag.collection_names before the first run. The presets ship with ["<collection_name>"] as a deliberate placeholder. Validation passes, retrieval fails silently for every request — manifests as Citation count (mean): 0 everywhere.
  • load.concurrency_list, rag.vdb_top_k_list, rag.reranker_top_k_list are read-only properties that normalise scalar-or-list to a list. Use them when reasoning about the grid; the underlying YAML field is whatever the user wrote.
  • aiperf.enabled: false changes filenames. The top-level outputs become profile_report.md / profile_results.json / profile_results.csv. The aggregate sweep table also suppresses load-test rows and the "Optimal throughput" footer.
  • Resolved-config dump is verbose (50+ lines) — expected. It's what makes terminal output a self-contained reproducer; don't filter it out in scripts.
  • The aiperf shell command is logged before each subprocess. Look for \n $ python -m aiperf profile -m ... --endpoint-type nvidia_rag ... in stdout — copy-paste runnable for reproducing a single point outside rag-perf.
  • --endpoint-type nvidia_rag comes from the bundled plugin at scripts/rag-perf/rag_perf/plugin/nvidia_rag.py. It teaches aiperf about the RAG /v1/generate request shape and parses citations + per-stage metrics out of the SSE stream. If aiperf can't resolve nvidia_rag, rag-perf needs editable installation in the venv — re-run uv sync --project scripts/rag-perf (or uv pip install -e ./scripts/rag-perf).
  • Sweep-mode point-name collision. When two points differ only in concurrency (e.g. [1, 4] × single vdb_top_k), the dir name encodes everything: CR:1_ISL:50_OSL:512_VDB-K:20_RERANKER-K:4_Model:.... Cluster / GPU / experiment_name (output.cluster, output.gpu, output.experiment_name) are appended too — useful for diff-friendly artifact paths across machines.
  • load.iterations > 1 repeats the entire grid. Each repetition writes to its own iter_<i>/. Aggregate CSV row count = n_points × iterations.

Source of truth

PieceLocation
Driverscripts/rag-perf/rag_perf/cli.py (main is the single Click command)
Schemascripts/rag-perf/rag_perf/config.py (RunConfig and sub-models)
Orchestratorscripts/rag-perf/rag_perf/runner.py (BenchmarkRunner.run, RagProfiler, AiperfRunner)
aiperf pluginscripts/rag-perf/rag_perf/plugin/nvidia_rag.py
User-facing docdocs/performance-benchmarking.md
Presetsscripts/rag-perf/configs/{quick_profile,single_run,sweep}.yaml
Sample queriesscripts/rag-perf/examples/queries.jsonl
Synthetic promptsscripts/rag-perf/prompts/default_prompts.yaml
Config schema detailsreferences/config-schema.md
Synthetic-query generationreferences/synthetic-generation.md
Output layout & metric semanticsreferences/output-and-analysis.md

Agent playbook

  1. Sync deps: uv sync --project scripts/rag-perf (one-time per checkout).
  2. Pick & customise a preset: copy scripts/rag-perf/configs/<preset>.yaml if you want a variant; always set rag.collection_names to a real collection.
  3. Run: uv run --project scripts/rag-perf rag-perf -c <config> from repo root.
  4. Read the per-point + aggregate tables on stdout. Bottleneck inference is in the per-point profiling section; comparison across points is the final aggregate table.
  5. Parse artifacts under output.dir/run_<ts>/ — see references/output-and-analysis.md. For multi-point runs, results.csv has one row per (point × iteration).
  6. Summarise for the user using the playbook in references/output-and-analysis.md#summarising-results-to-the-user — headline table, scaling-efficiency math for sweeps, mandatory flags for zero citations / non-zero errors / suspect llm_ttft_ms / low sample size, and a concrete next-experiment YAML.
  7. Tune retrieval / reranker: flip to quick_profile.yaml or aiperf.enabled: false for fast iteration, then return to single_run.yaml / sweep.yaml when characterising under load.
  8. Triage failures: see Troubleshooting above and references/output-and-analysis.md for empty-citation / bottleneck=N/A patterns.

Anti-Patterns

  • Optimizing before recording a baseline: Without a starting point, there is no trustworthy performance story.
  • Using toy traffic to justify production tuning: Tiny prompts or empty corpora hide the real bottleneck.
  • Accepting lower answer quality as an untracked side effect of a latency win.

Verification Protocol

Before claiming "skill applied successfully":

  1. Pass/fail: The performance investigation starts from a named baseline and a concrete bottleneck hypothesis.
  2. Pass/fail: The workload shape, corpus size, and concurrency assumptions match the path being optimized.
  3. Pass/fail: Any latency or throughput claim is paired with a correctness or quality guardrail.
  4. Pressure-test scenario: Re-run the workflow on a retrieval stack that speeds up only because caching masked a stale index.
  5. Success metric: The user gets a reproducible benchmark path and a tuning change that improves the intended metric without hidden regressions.
<!-- MCP:START --> <!-- PORTABILITY:START -->

Cross-Client Portability

This skill is written to stay usable across GitHub Copilot, Claude Code, and Codex.

  • GitHub Copilot: keep the folder in a Copilot-visible skill path or wrap the workflow in project instructions when folder discovery is unavailable.
  • Claude Code: keep the folder in a local skills directory or a compatible plugin source.
  • Codex: install or sync the folder into $CODEX_HOME/skills/rag-perf and restart Codex after major changes.
<!-- PORTABILITY:END -->

MCP Availability And Fallback

Preferred MCP Server: None required

  • Fallback prompt: "Use the rag-perf skill without MCP. Rely on the local SKILL.md, bundled references or scripts, and manual verification. Show the exact commands, evidence, and final checks you used before concluding."
  • If the current host does not expose a matching server, use the bundled references, scripts, native toolchain, and manual workflow already described in this skill.
  • Treat direct local verification, rendered output, logs, tests, or screenshots as the fallback evidence path before completion.
<!-- MCP:END -->

Related Skills

  • devops-tooling: Use it when the performance work also needs container, CI, or infrastructure diagnostics.
  • cloud-design-patterns: Use it when bottlenecks reveal larger scaling or architecture tradeoffs.
  • documentation-verification: Use it when benchmark claims must be published or preserved in repo docs.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.