Check pr
npx -y skills add Bboyfarouk/skills --skill check-prAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 2 stars2 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Checks a GitHub pull request for unresolved review comments, failing status checks, and incomplete PR descriptions. Waits for pending checks to complete, categorizes issues as actionable or informational, and optionally fixes and resolves them. Use when the user wants to check a PR, address review feedback, or prepare a PR for merge.
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
4.3 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Check PR
Analyze a pull request for review comments, status checks, and description completeness, then help address any issues found.
Inputs
- PR number (optional): If not provided, detect the PR for the current branch.
Instructions
1. Identify the PR
If a PR number was provided, use it. Otherwise, detect it:
gh pr view --json number -q .number
2. Fetch PR details
gh pr view <PR_NUMBER> --json title,body,state,reviews,comments,headRefName,statusCheckRollup
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/<PR_NUMBER>/comments
3. Wait for pending checks
Before analyzing, ensure all status checks have completed. If any checks are PENDING or IN_PROGRESS, poll every 30 seconds until all checks reach a terminal state (success or failure). This ensures that review bot comments (Greptile, linters, etc.) are available before analysis.
4. Analyze the PR
Once all checks are complete, evaluate these areas:
A. Status Checks
- Are all CI checks passing?
- If any are failing, identify which ones and the failure reason.
B. PR Description
- Is the description complete and follows team conventions?
- Are all required sections filled in?
- Are there TODOs or placeholders that need updating?
C. Review Comments
- Inline code review comments that need addressing
- Look for bot review comments (e.g. from
greptile-apps[bot], linters, etc.) - Human reviewer comments
D. General Comments
- Discussion comments on the PR
- Bot comments (Vercel deploy previews, etc.) — usually informational
5. Categorize issues
For each issue found, categorize as:
| Category | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Actionable | Code changes, test improvements, or fixes needed |
| Informational | Verification notes, questions, or FYIs that don't require changes |
| Already addressed | Issues that appear to be resolved by subsequent commits |
6. Report findings
Present a summary table:
| Area | Issue | Status | Action Needed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Status Checks | CI build failing | Failing | Fix type error in src/api.ts |
| Review | "Add null check" — @reviewer | Actionable | Add guard clause |
| Description | TODO placeholder in test plan | Actionable | Fill in test plan |
| Review | "Looks good" — @teammate | Informational | None |
7. Fix issues (if requested)
If there are actionable items:
- Switch to the PR's branch if not already on it.
- Ask the user if they want to fix the issues.
- If yes, make the fixes, commit, and push.
8. Resolve review threads
After addressing comments, resolve the corresponding review threads.
First, fetch unresolved thread IDs (paginate if needed — see the GraphQL reference):
gh api graphql -f query='
query($cursor: String) {
repository(owner: "OWNER", name: "REPO") {
pullRequest(number: PR_NUMBER) {
reviewThreads(first: 100, after: $cursor) {
pageInfo { hasNextPage endCursor }
nodes {
id
isResolved
comments(first: 1) {
nodes { body path }
}
}
}
}
}
}'
If hasNextPage is true, repeat with -f cursor=ENDCURSOR to get remaining threads.
Then resolve threads that have been addressed or are informational:
gh api graphql -f query='
mutation {
resolveReviewThread(input: {threadId: "THREAD_ID"}) {
thread { isResolved }
}
}'
Batch multiple resolutions into a single mutation using aliases (t1, t2, etc.).
9. Multiple PRs
If checking a chain of PRs, process them sequentially.
Output format
Summarize:
- PR title and current state
- Status checks summary (passing/failing/pending)
- Total issues found
- Actionable items with descriptions
- Items that can be ignored with reasons
- Recommended next steps