Sync
claude-devkit - an agentic coding framework
npx -y skills add backspace-shmackspace/claude-devkit --skill syncAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 15 stars15 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Synchronize CLAUDE.md and README with recent code changes.
SKILL.md
4.6 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
/sync Workflow
Inputs
- Scope: $ARGUMENTS (optional: "recent", "full")
recent: Last 5 commits (default)full: Full codebase scan
Role
You are the documentation coordinator. You detect changes, delegate review to the librarian, and present diffs for user approval. You do NOT make documentation changes yourself — you coordinate the process.
Step 1 — Detect changes
Tool: Bash (direct — coordinator does this)
Determine scope:
- If
$ARGUMENTSis empty: scope = "recent" - Else: scope =
$ARGUMENTS
Validate scope is one of: recent, full. If not, stop with:
"Invalid scope. Use: /sync [recent|full]"
If scope is "recent":
Run: git log -5 --oneline --name-status
If scope is "full":
Run: git log -20 --oneline --name-status
Extract:
- Changed files (from --name-status)
- Commit messages (from --oneline)
Derive timestamp: [timestamp] = current ISO datetime (e.g., 2026-02-07T12-30-00)
Step 2 — Detect new environment variables
Tool: Grep, pattern=process\.env|os\.getenv|ENV\[|getenv\(|std::env, output_mode=content
Search for environment variable references in:
- Source code files (not test files)
- Configuration files
- Documentation files
Generate list of environment variables found.
Tool: Read (direct — coordinator does this)
Read CLAUDE.md and check which environment variables are already documented.
Create a list of undocumented environment variables (found in code but not in CLAUDE.md).
Step 3 — Librarian review
Tool: Task, subagent_type=general-purpose, model=claude-sonnet-4-6
Prompt: "You are reviewing documentation for currency and accuracy.
Recent changes: [Paste commit list and changed files from Step 1]
Undocumented environment variables: [List from Step 2]
Task:
- Read the current
CLAUDE.mdandREADME.mdfiles - Compare them against the recent code changes
- Identify documentation that is now stale, missing, or incorrect
Write ./plans/sync-[timestamp].review.md with this structure:
Verdict
[CURRENT / UPDATES_NEEDED]
Required Updates
(Changes that must be made for accuracy)
CLAUDE.md
- Update tech stack version (e.g., 'React 17' → 'React 18')
- Add missing environment variable: VAR_NAME
- Remove deprecated pattern: [pattern name]
- Update build command: [old] → [new]
README.md
- Update installation steps
- Add new dependency: [name]
- Update example usage
- Fix broken link: [url]
Suggested Updates
(Optional improvements)
- Add example for new feature
- Clarify ambiguous section: [section name]
- Add troubleshooting for common issue
Rationale
(Why these changes are needed - reference specific commits or code changes)"
Step 4 — Update documentation (conditional)
Read ./plans/sync-[timestamp].review.md and check verdict.
If verdict is CURRENT: Output: "✅ Documentation is current. No updates needed.
Review: ./plans/sync-[timestamp].review.md"
Stop the workflow.
If verdict is UPDATES_NEEDED:
Tool: Task, subagent_type=general-purpose, model=claude-sonnet-4-6
Prompt: "You are updating project documentation based on a librarian review.
Read the review at ./plans/sync-[timestamp].review.md.
Apply all Required Updates to CLAUDE.md and README.md.
Use the Edit tool to make precise changes.
Follow markdown best practices:
- Use proper heading hierarchy
- Keep lines under 100 characters
- Use code blocks with language specifiers
- Use relative links for local files
- Keep tables aligned
Do NOT add suggested updates unless they're critical. Do NOT change formatting or structure unnecessarily."
Step 5 — Verification
Tool: Bash (direct — coordinator does this)
Run: git diff CLAUDE.md README.md
Present the diff output to the user with this message:
"📝 Documentation changes ready for review:
[Show git diff output]
Review the changes above.
To accept these changes:
git add CLAUDE.md README.md
git commit -m \"docs: sync with codebase
Updates documentation to reflect recent code changes.
Review: ./plans/sync-[timestamp].review.md
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet <[email protected]>\"
To reject:
git restore CLAUDE.md README.md
Review: ./plans/sync-[timestamp].review.md"
Step 6 — Archive review
Tool: Bash (direct — coordinator does this)
Run: mkdir -p ./plans/archive/sync && mv ./plans/sync-[timestamp].review.md ./plans/archive/sync/
Output: "Review archived to ./plans/archive/sync/sync-[timestamp].review.md"