Nvidia cuopt numerical optimization api python
Skill autohandai/community-skills/nvidia-cuopt-numerical-optimization-api-python
A collection of curated, useful, and safe skills for Autohand Code CLI Agent
npx -y skills add autohandai/community-skills --skill nvidia-cuopt-numerical-optimization-api-pythonAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 9 stars9 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Solve Linear Programming (LP), Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP), and Quadratic Programming (QP, beta) with the Python API. Use when the user asks about optimization with linear or quadratic objectives, linear constraints, integer variables, scheduling, resource allocation, facility location, production planning, portfolio optimization, or least squares.
The file declares its own license as Apache-2.0 AND CC-BY-4.0. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
11.8 KB, ~3.0k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
cuOpt Numerical Optimization Skill (Python)
Model and solve LP, MILP, and QP problems using NVIDIA cuOpt's GPU-accelerated solver. The Python API surface (Problem, SolverSettings, solve) is shared across all three problem classes — only the objective form and a few rules change.
Before You Start
Use a formulation summary (parameters, constraints, decisions, objective) if available; otherwise ask for decision variables, objective, and constraints. Then confirm problem type (LP / MILP / QP — see below) and variable types.
Choosing LP vs MILP vs QP
Decide from the objective and variables:
| If the objective is... | And variables are... | Use |
|---|---|---|
Linear (sum of c_i * x_i) | All continuous | LP |
| Linear | Some integer or binary | MILP |
Has squared (x*x) or cross (x*y) terms | Continuous (integer QP not supported) | QP (beta) |
Prefer LP when the problem allows it. LP solves faster and has stronger optimality guarantees. Use MILP only when the problem logically requires whole numbers or yes/no decisions. Use QP only when the objective is genuinely quadratic (variance, squared error, kinetic energy).
Problem types that need extra care: Multi-period planning and goal programming are easy to misinterpret. Double-check that rates and constraints apply to the right time period or priority level (AGENTS.md: verify understanding before code).
- Use LP when every quantity can meaningfully be fractional: flows, proportions, rates, dollars, hours, tonnes of material, etc.
- Use MILP when the problem mentions counts of discrete entities, yes/no choices, or either/or decisions (e.g. open a facility or not, assign a person to a shift, number of trucks).
- Use QP when the objective minimizes variance, squared error, or any expression with
x*xorx*yterms (portfolio optimization, least squares, regularized regression).
Integer vs continuous from wording
Choose variable type from what the problem describes.
| Problem wording / concept | Variable type | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Discrete entities (counts) | INTEGER | Workers, cars, trucks, machines, pilots, facilities, units to manufacture (when "units" means whole items), trainees, vehicles |
| Yes/no or on/off | INTEGER (binary, lb=0 ub=1) | Open a facility, run a machine, produce a product line, assign a person to a shift |
| Amounts that can be fractional | CONTINUOUS | Tonnes, litres, dollars, hours, kWh, proportion of capacity, flow volume, weight |
| Rates or fractions | CONTINUOUS | Utilization, percentage, share of budget |
| Unclear | Prefer INTEGER if the noun is a countable thing (a worker, a car); prefer CONTINUOUS if it's a measure (amount of steel, hours worked). If the problem says "whole" or "integer" or "number of", use INTEGER. |
Rule of thumb: If the quantity is "how many things" (people, vehicles, items, sites), use INTEGER. If it's "how much" (mass, volume, money, time) or a rate, use CONTINUOUS unless the problem explicitly requires whole numbers.
Quick Reference: Python API
LP Example
from cuopt.linear_programming.problem import Problem, CONTINUOUS, MAXIMIZE
from cuopt.linear_programming.solver_settings import SolverSettings
# Create problem
problem = Problem("MyLP")
# Decision variables
x = problem.addVariable(lb=0, vtype=CONTINUOUS, name="x")
y = problem.addVariable(lb=0, vtype=CONTINUOUS, name="y")
# Constraints
problem.addConstraint(2*x + 3*y <= 120, name="resource_a")
problem.addConstraint(4*x + 2*y <= 100, name="resource_b")
# Objective
problem.setObjective(40*x + 30*y, sense=MAXIMIZE)
# Solve
settings = SolverSettings()
settings.set_parameter("time_limit", 60)
problem.solve(settings)
# Check status (CRITICAL: use PascalCase!)
if problem.Status.name in ["Optimal", "PrimalFeasible"]:
print(f"Objective: {problem.ObjValue}")
print(f"x = {x.getValue()}")
print(f"y = {y.getValue()}")
MILP Example (with integer variables)
from cuopt.linear_programming.problem import Problem, CONTINUOUS, INTEGER, MINIMIZE
problem = Problem("FacilityLocation")
# Binary variable (integer with bounds 0-1)
open_facility = problem.addVariable(lb=0, ub=1, vtype=INTEGER, name="open")
# Continuous variable
production = problem.addVariable(lb=0, vtype=CONTINUOUS, name="production")
# Linking constraint: can only produce if facility is open
problem.addConstraint(production <= 1000 * open_facility, name="link")
# Objective: fixed cost + variable cost
problem.setObjective(500*open_facility + 2*production, sense=MINIMIZE)
# MILP-specific settings
settings = SolverSettings()
settings.set_parameter("time_limit", 120)
settings.set_parameter("mip_relative_gap", 0.01) # 1% optimality gap
problem.solve(settings)
# Check status
if problem.Status.name in ["Optimal", "FeasibleFound"]:
print(f"Open facility: {open_facility.getValue() > 0.5}")
print(f"Production: {production.getValue()}")
QP Example (beta — MINIMIZE only)
from cuopt.linear_programming.problem import Problem, CONTINUOUS, MINIMIZE
from cuopt.linear_programming.solver_settings import SolverSettings
# Portfolio variance minimization
problem = Problem("Portfolio")
x1 = problem.addVariable(lb=0, ub=1, vtype=CONTINUOUS, name="stock_a")
x2 = problem.addVariable(lb=0, ub=1, vtype=CONTINUOUS, name="stock_b")
x3 = problem.addVariable(lb=0, ub=1, vtype=CONTINUOUS, name="stock_c")
# Quadratic objective (variance) — MUST be MINIMIZE
problem.setObjective(
0.04*x1*x1 + 0.02*x2*x2 + 0.01*x3*x3
+ 0.02*x1*x2 + 0.01*x1*x3 + 0.016*x2*x3,
sense=MINIMIZE,
)
# Linear constraints
problem.addConstraint(x1 + x2 + x3 == 1, name="budget")
problem.addConstraint(0.12*x1 + 0.08*x2 + 0.05*x3 >= 0.08, name="min_return")
problem.solve(SolverSettings())
if problem.Status.name in ["Optimal", "PrimalFeasible"]:
print(f"Variance: {problem.ObjValue}")
QP rules:
- MINIMIZE only — solver rejects MAXIMIZE for quadratic objectives. To maximize
f(x), minimize-f(x). - Continuous variables only — integer QP is not supported.
- Q should be PSD (positive semi-definite) for a convex problem; otherwise the solver may return a non-optimal stationary point.
- Beta — API may evolve; treat as production-capable for typical convex QP but expect occasional changes.
See resources/qp_examples.md for least-squares, maximization-workaround, and matrix-form examples.
CRITICAL: Status Checking
Status values use PascalCase, NOT ALL_CAPS:
# ✅ CORRECT
if problem.Status.name in ["Optimal", "FeasibleFound"]:
print(problem.ObjValue)
# ❌ WRONG - will silently fail!
if problem.Status.name == "OPTIMAL": # Never matches!
print(problem.ObjValue)
LP Status Values: Optimal, NoTermination, NumericalError, PrimalInfeasible, DualInfeasible, IterationLimit, TimeLimit, PrimalFeasible
MILP Status Values: Optimal, FeasibleFound, Infeasible, Unbounded, TimeLimit, NoTermination
QP Status Values: Same set as LP. For QP debugging, print f"Actual status: '{problem.Status.name}'" and check that Q is PSD and variables are reasonably scaled.
Common Modeling Patterns
Binary Selection
# Select exactly k items from n
items = [problem.addVariable(lb=0, ub=1, vtype=INTEGER) for _ in range(n)]
problem.addConstraint(sum(items) == k)
Big-M Linking
# If y=1, then x <= 100; if y=0, x can be anything up to M
M = 10000
problem.addConstraint(x <= 100 + M*(1 - y))
If-then "must also produce"
When the problem says if we do X then we must also do Y, enforce both (i) the binary link and (ii) that Y is actually produced:
# y_X <= y_Y (if we do X, we must "do" Y)
problem.addConstraint(y_X <= y_Y)
# Production of Y when Y is chosen: produce at least 1 (or a minimum) when y_Y=1
problem.addConstraint(production_Y >= 1 * y_Y) # or min_amount * y_Y
Otherwise the solver can set y_Y=1 but production_Y=0, satisfying the binary link but not the intent.
Building large expressions
Chained + over many terms can hit recursion limits in the API. Prefer building objectives and constraints with LinearExpression:
from cuopt.linear_programming.problem import LinearExpression
# Build as list of (vars, coeffs) instead of v1*c1 + v2*c2 + ...
vars_list = [x, y, z]
coeffs_list = [1.0, 2.0, 3.0]
expr = LinearExpression(vars_list, coeffs_list, constant=0.0)
problem.addConstraint(expr <= 100)
See reference models in this skill's assets/ for examples.
Piecewise Linear (SOS2)
# Approximate nonlinear function with breakpoints
# Use lambda variables that sum to 1, at most 2 adjacent non-zero
Solver Settings
settings = SolverSettings()
# Time limit
settings.set_parameter("time_limit", 60)
# MILP gap tolerance (stop when within X% of optimal)
settings.set_parameter("mip_relative_gap", 0.01)
# Logging
settings.set_parameter("log_to_console", 1)
Common Issues
| Problem | Likely Cause | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Status never "OPTIMAL" | Using wrong case | Use "Optimal" not "OPTIMAL" |
| Integer var has fractional value | Defined as CONTINUOUS | Use vtype=INTEGER |
| Infeasible | Conflicting constraints | Check constraint logic |
| Unbounded | Missing bounds | Add variable bounds |
| Slow solve | Large problem | Set time limit, increase gap tolerance |
| Maximum recursion depth | Building big expr with chained + | Use LinearExpression(vars_list, coeffs_list, constant) |
| QP rejected with MAXIMIZE | QP only supports MINIMIZE | Negate the objective: minimize -f(x) |
| QP returns non-optimal | Q not PSD or variables badly scaled | Check Q is PSD; rescale variables to similar magnitudes |
Getting Dual Values (LP only)
if problem.Status.name == "Optimal":
constraint = problem.getConstraint("resource_a")
shadow_price = constraint.DualValue
print(f"Shadow price: {shadow_price}")
Reference Models
All reference models live in this skill's assets/ directory. Use them as reference when building new applications; do not edit them in place.
Minimal / canonical examples (LP, MILP, QP)
| Model | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| lp_basic | LP | Minimal LP: variables, constraints, objective, solve |
| lp_duals | LP | Dual values and reduced costs |
| lp_warmstart | LP | PDLP warmstart for similar problems |
| milp_basic | MILP | Minimal MIP; includes incumbent callback example |
| milp_production_planning | MILP | Production planning with resource constraints |
| portfolio | QP | Minimize portfolio variance; budget and min-return constraints |
| least_squares | QP | Minimize (x-3)² + (y-4)² (closest point) |
| maximization_workaround | QP | Maximize quadratic via minimize -f(x) |
Other reference
| Model | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| mps_solver | LP/MILP | Solve any problem from standard MPS file format |
Quick command to list models: ls assets/ (from this skill's directory).
When to Escalate
Use troubleshooting and diagnostic guidance if:
- Infeasible and you can't determine why
- Numerical issues
What ships with it: 27 files
195.4 KB alongside SKILL.md, 10 of them executable
assets/
- least_squares/model.pyruns831 B
- least_squares/README.md136 B
- lp_basic/model.pyruns1.1 KB
- lp_basic/README.md207 B
- lp_duals/model.pyruns1.2 KB
- lp_duals/README.md227 B
- lp_warmstart/model.pyruns1.8 KB
- lp_warmstart/README.md140 B
- maximization_workaround/model.pyruns736 B
- maximization_workaround/README.md152 B
- milp_basic/incumbent_callback.pyruns1.8 KB
- milp_basic/model.pyruns1.2 KB
- milp_basic/README.md433 B
- milp_production_planning/model.pyruns1.2 KB
- milp_production_planning/README.md165 B
- mps_solver/data/README.md2.0 KB
- mps_solver/data/sample.mps490 B
- mps_solver/model.pyruns8.2 KB
- mps_solver/README.md2.2 KB
- mps_solver/results.md2.5 KB
- portfolio/model.pyruns1.6 KB
- portfolio/README.md232 B
- README.md579 B
evals/
- evals.json147.2 KB
- SOURCES.md1.8 KB
resources/
- qp_examples.md5.7 KB
- LICENSE11.9 KB