agentsclimarketplace

Defi bridge route planner

Skill auralshin/agent-skills/skills/defi-bridge-route-planner

DEFI-focused skill pack for agentic assistants

Install
npx -y skills add auralshin/agent-skills --skill defi-bridge-route-planner

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Use this skill to compare cross-chain bridge routes by total cost, settlement time, and risk, using aggregator and direct-bridge quotes with explicit freshness checks.

The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.

SKILL.md

3.0 KB, 626 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

DeFi Bridge Route Planner

Purpose

Compare cross-chain transfer options and produce a recommendation with explicit cost/time/risk tradeoffs and quote freshness guarantees.

Is adding a bridge aggregator helpful?

Yes. Aggregators are highly useful as the first discovery layer because they:

  • reveal more route candidates (bridges + solvers) quickly,
  • improve price competition,
  • reduce manual route-by-route querying.

But aggregators should not be the only source. For high-value transfers, cross-check at least one direct bridge quote before final recommendation.

External dependency profile

  • Dependency level: High for live route quality.
  • Primary sources: bridge aggregators and solver quote APIs.
  • Secondary sources: direct bridge quote endpoints.
  • Validation/backfill: chain RPC gas estimates and route status pages.
  • Offline fallback: cost-modeling only on user-supplied route snapshots.

Use this skill when

  • The user wants to bridge assets across chains.
  • The user asks for cheapest, fastest, safest, or balanced route.
  • The user needs route comparison with fees, slippage, ETA, and risk.

Workflow

  1. Capture transfer intent (token, amount, source chain, destination chain, urgency, objective).
  2. Fetch route candidates from aggregators first. See references/aggregator-integration.md.
  3. Cross-check with direct bridge quotes for major candidates.
  4. Score routes with scripts/route_cost_model.py using objective + risk limit.
  5. Apply risk checks from references/risk-checklist.md.
  6. Return ranked options and recommended route, including quote freshness and caveats.

Data quality rules

  • Treat expired quotes as ineligible.
  • Reject routes above user risk tolerance.
  • Always surface canonical vs wrapped destination token behavior.
  • Show total cost decomposition (fees/slippage/gas).

Required output format

{
  "intent": {
    "from_chain": "string",
    "to_chain": "string",
    "token": "string",
    "amount": 0,
    "objective": "cheapest|fastest|safest|balanced"
  },
  "route_options": [
    {
      "route_name": "string",
      "bridge_or_solver": "string",
      "quote_source": "aggregator|direct_bridge",
      "estimated_receive_amount": 0,
      "total_cost_usd": 0,
      "estimated_time_minutes": 0,
      "risk_level": "low|medium|high",
      "quote_age_seconds": 0,
      "quote_valid": true,
      "risk_notes": ["string"]
    }
  ],
  "recommended_route": {
    "route_name": "string",
    "reason": "string"
  },
  "critical_warnings": ["string"]
}

Bundled resources

  • references/aggregator-integration.md
  • references/risk-checklist.md
  • references/route-selection-policy.md
  • scripts/route_cost_model.py
  • assets/route-options-template.csv

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.