Audit liquidation calculation
Audits Solidity liquidation mechanisms for calculation vulnerabilities including incorrect liquidator reward decimals making rewards too small/large, unprioritized liquidator rewards paid after other fees removing incentive, excessive protocol fees making liquidation unprofitable, minimum collateral requirements not accounting for liquidation costs, unaccounted yield/PNL not included in collateral valuation, missing swap fees during liquidation, and oracle sandwich self-liquidation manipulationFrom its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add auditmos/skills --skill audit-liquidation-calculationAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 14 stars14 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its file declares
Copied from the file, not written here
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
6.3 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Liquidation Calculation Auditor
When to Use
- Auditing liquidation reward calculations, fee distribution, collateral valuation
- User mentions: liquidation reward, protocol fee, minimum collateral, yield, PNL, self-liquidation, oracle manipulation, liquidation profitability
- Analyzing liquidation economics, fee structures, collateral calculations
- Reviewing reward priorities, decimal handling in liquidations
Audit Workflow
IMPORTANT: Announce skill usage at start of analysis
Begin with: "I'm using the audit-liquidation-calculation skill to analyze this contract for liquidation calculation and economic vulnerabilities..."
-
Scan for liquidation calculation operations
- Search:
liquidate,liquidationReward,liquidationBonus,protocolFee,collateralValue,minimumCollateral,yield,PNL,earnedYield - Focus: reward calculations, fee priorities, collateral valuations, decimal handling
- Search:
-
Check against vulnerability patterns
- Reference
reference.mdfor complete checklist - Compare code against
example.md
- Reference
-
Validate exploitability
- Check access control first - grep for
onlyOwner|onlyAdmin|onlyGovernancemodifiers - Can non-privileged actors exploit liquidation calculation issues?
- Are liquidator rewards calculated correctly with proper decimals?
- Are rewards paid before or after other fees?
- Do protocol fees make liquidation unprofitable?
- Does minimum collateral account for liquidation costs?
- Is yield/PNL included in collateral value?
- Are swap fees charged during liquidation?
- Can users self-liquidate profitably via oracle manipulation?
- Verify no compensating protections exist
- Downgrade severity if admin-only unless systemic liquidation failure
- Check access control first - grep for
-
Generate report
- Use deliverable template below
- Include economic analysis and PoC
- Rank by severity
Core Vulnerability Patterns
See reference.md for full checklist. Key patterns:
- Incorrect liquidator reward → decimal precision errors make rewards unusable
- Unprioritized liquidator reward → other fees paid first, no incentive remains
- Excessive protocol fee → 30%+ fees make liquidation unprofitable
- Missing liquidation fees in requirements → positions unliquidatable at minimum
- Unaccounted yield/PNL → collateral undervalued, unfair liquidations
- No swap fee during liquidation → protocol loses revenue
- Oracle sandwich self-liquidation → users profit from triggering oracle updates
Code examples: See example.md
Severity Criteria
Critical: Liquidator rewards calculated incorrectly causing systemic liquidation failure, profitable self-liquidation via oracle manipulation, MUST be exploitable by non-privileged actors High: Unprioritized rewards removing liquidation incentive, excessive protocol fees preventing liquidation, unaccounted yield causing unfair liquidations, MUST be exploitable by non-privileged actors Medium: Missing swap fees during liquidation, minimum collateral not accounting for costs, admin-only fee configuration issues with cascading liquidation impact Low: Suboptimal fee structures without security impact, admin-only parameter issues without immediate liquidation impact
IMPORTANT: Admin-only liquidation fee functions (onlyOwner, onlyAdmin, onlyGovernance) are MEDIUM or LOW severity unless:
- Invalid fee parameters cause systemic liquidation failure (e.g., protocol fee > liquidation bonus)
- Missing validation enables admin to drain liquidation rewards for personal gain
- Calculation errors directly lead to unprofitable liquidations and bad debt accumulation
False Positives - Do NOT Flag
- Protocols with trusted liquidators where profitability not required
- Documented admin fee collection mechanisms
- Alternative reward structures with analysis showing profitability
- Intentional yield/PNL handling with documented rationale
- Protocols without oracle-based pricing (no oracle manipulation risk)
- Admin-only fee setter functions (onlyOwner, onlyAdmin) with documented validation and bounds
- Governance-controlled liquidation bonus parameters with analysis showing profitability
- Admin functions for protocol fee collection where liquidator rewards are prioritized
Deliverable Format
MANDATORY: Before deliverable, verify each checklist.md item against codebase. Flag violations as findings.
Use template: templates/report-template.md
Each finding includes: severity, pattern #, file/lines, description, vulnerable code, economic impact analysis, PoC showing unprofitable liquidation or exploitation, remediation, gas impact.
Key Principles
- Decimal precision - liquidator rewards must use correct decimals to be spendable
- Priority - liquidator rewards paid first, protocol fees second
- Profitability - total fees < liquidation bonus to maintain incentive
- Completeness - minimum collateral accounts for all liquidation costs
- Fair valuation - yield/PNL included in collateral calculations
- Revenue capture - protocol charges fees on liquidation swaps
- Manipulation resistance - prevent profitable self-liquidation via oracle updates
Output Guidelines
DO:
- Reference specific lines and functions
- Provide economic analysis (fees vs rewards vs costs)
- Show PoCs demonstrating unprofitable liquidations
- Quantify reward calculation errors
- Calculate break-even points for liquidation profitability
DON'T:
- Report intentional design choices with documentation
- Flag missing features with alternative mechanisms in place
- Use vague terms ("might be unprofitable")
- Ignore gas costs and on-chain fee context