agentsclimarketplace

Math review

Skill athola/claude-night-market/plugins/pensive/skills/math-review

Verifies math-heavy code for algorithmic correctness and numerical stability. Use when reviewing scientific algorithms, ML models, or numerical code.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add athola/claude-night-market --skill math-review

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

SKILL.md

5.7 KB, ~1.2k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Table of Contents

Mathematical Algorithm Review

Intensive analysis ensuring numerical stability and alignment with standards.

Quick Start

/math-review

Verification: Run the command with --help flag to verify availability.

When To Use

  • Changes to mathematical models or algorithms
  • Statistical routines or probabilistic logic
  • Numerical integration or optimization
  • Scientific computing code
  • ML/AI model implementations
  • Safety-critical calculations

When NOT To Use

  • General algorithm review - use architecture-review
  • Performance optimization - use parseltongue:python-performance

Required TodoWrite Items

  1. math-review:context-synced
  2. math-review:requirements-mapped
  3. math-review:derivations-verified
  4. math-review:stability-assessed
  5. math-review:evidence-logged
  6. math-review:findings-verified

Core Workflow

1. Context Sync

pwd && git status -sb && git diff --stat origin/main..HEAD

Verification: Run git status to confirm working tree state. Enumerate math-heavy files (source, tests, docs, notebooks). Classify risk: safety-critical, financial, ML fairness.

2. Requirements Mapping

Translate requirements → mathematical invariants. Document pre/post conditions, conservation laws, bounds. Load: modules/requirements-mapping.md

3. Derivation Verification

Re-derive formulas using CAS. Challenge approximations. Cite authoritative standards (NASA-STD-7009, ASME VVUQ). Load: modules/derivation-verification.md

4. Stability Assessment

Evaluate conditioning, precision, scaling, randomness. Compare complexity. Quantify uncertainty. Load: modules/numerical-stability.md

5. Proof of Work

pytest tests/math/ --benchmark
jupyter nbconvert --execute derivation.ipynb

Verification: Run pytest -v tests/math/ to verify. Log deviations, recommend: Approve / Approve with actions / Block. Load: modules/testing-strategies.md

6. Verify Findings Are Grounded (math-review:findings-verified)

Every issue must cite a real location and a verbatim anchor. Write findings to .review/findings.json and confirm each citation resolves:

python plugins/imbue/scripts/citation_verifier.py \
  --findings .review/findings.json --repo-root .

Drop or label UNVERIFIED any finding the verifier fails (exit 1); only verified findings enter the report. See Skill(imbue:review-core) Step 5 for the protocol and Skill(imbue:structured-output) for the finding schema.

Progressive Loading

Default (200 tokens): Core workflow, checklists +Requirements (+300 tokens): Invariants, pre/post conditions, coverage analysis +Derivation (+350 tokens): CAS verification, standards, citations +Stability (+400 tokens): Numerical properties, precision, complexity +Testing (+350 tokens): Edge cases, benchmarks, reproducibility

Total with all modules: ~1600 tokens

Essential Checklist

Correctness: Formulas match spec | Edge cases handled | Units consistent | Domain enforced Stability: Condition number OK | Precision sufficient | No cancellation | Overflow prevented Verification: Derivations documented | References cited | Tests cover invariants | Benchmarks reproducible Documentation: Assumptions stated | Limitations documented | Error bounds specified | References linked

Output Format

## Summary
[Brief findings]

## Context
Files | Risk classification | Standards

## Requirements Analysis
| Invariant | Verified | Evidence |

## Derivation Review
[Status and conflicts]

## Stability Analysis
Condition number | Precision | Risks

## Issues
[M1] [Title]
- Location: file.py:123
- Anchor: `verbatim source text at line 123`
- Issue: [what is wrong] | Fix: [remediation] | Evidence: [E1]

## Recommendation
Approve / Approve with actions / Block

Every issue's Anchor is the exact source text at Location; it is what citation_verifier.py re-reads to prove the finding is real. Verification: Run the command with --help flag to verify availability.

Exit Criteria

  • Context synced, requirements mapped, derivations verified, stability assessed, evidence logged with citations
  • Every reported issue carries a Location + verbatim Anchor, and citation_verifier.py confirmed all citations (exit 0) or unverified issues were dropped or labeled UNVERIFIED

What ships with it: 4 files

14.0 KB alongside SKILL.md

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 326,871. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.