Mcp code execution
Skill athola/claude-night-market/plugins/conserve/skills/mcp-code-execution
23 Claude Code plugins: TDD enforcement hooks, git/PR workflows, spec-driven development, code review, project lifecycle, fix-from-error, maintenance automation, context optimization, research, and multi-LLM delegation. 186 skills, 128 commands, 54 agents.
npx -y skills add athola/claude-night-market --skill mcp-code-executionAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.
SKILL.md
9.2 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Table of Contents
- Quick Start
- When to Use
- Core Hub Responsibilities
- Required TodoWrite Items
- Step 1 – Assess Workflow
- Workflow Classification
- MECW Risk Assessment
- Step 2 – Route to Modules
- Module Orchestration
- Step 3 – Coordinate MECW
- Cross-Module MECW Management
- Step 4 – Synthesize Results
- Result Integration
- Module Integration
- With Context Optimization Hub
- Performance Skills Integration
- Emergency Protocols
- Hub-Level Emergency Response
- Success Metrics
MCP Code Execution Hub
Quick Start
This skill is an orchestration hub, not a CLI. It activates inside a Claude Code session when one of the trigger keywords below appears, or when invoked explicitly:
Skill(conserve:mcp-code-execution)
The hub then routes to the relevant sub-skill modules
(mcp-subagents, mcp-patterns, mcp-validation) based on
the detected workflow shape. There is no separate install
step or CLI entry point.
When To Use
- Automatic: Keywords:
code execution,MCP,tool chain,data pipeline,MECW - Tool Chains: >3 tools chained sequentially
- Data Processing: Large datasets (>10k rows) or files (>50KB)
- Context Pressure: Current usage >25% of total window (proactive context management)
MCP Tool Search (Claude Code 2.1.7+): When MCP tool descriptions exceed 10% of context, tools are automatically deferred and discovered via MCPSearch instead of being loaded upfront. This reduces token overhead by ~85% but means tools must be discovered on-demand. Haiku models do not support tool search. Configure threshold with
ENABLE_TOOL_SEARCH=auto:Nwhere N is the percentage.
Subagent MCP Access Fix (Claude Code 2.1.30+): SDK-provided MCP tools are now properly synced to subagents. Prior to 2.1.30, subagents could not access SDK-provided MCP tools: workflows delegating MCP tool usage to subagents were silently broken. No workarounds needed on 2.1.30+.
Claude.ai MCP Connectors (Claude Code 2.1.46+): Users logged into Claude Code with a claude.ai account may have additional MCP tools auto-loaded from claude.ai/settings/connectors. These tools contribute to the tool search threshold count. If workflows unexpectedly trigger tool search or context inflation, check
/mcpfor claude.ai-sourced connectors. Known reliability issue: connectors can silently disappear (GitHub #21817).
MCP Prompt Cache Fix (Claude Code 2.1.70+): MCP servers with instructions connecting after the first turn no longer bust the prompt cache. Previously, a late-connecting MCP server would invalidate cached prompt prefixes, increasing token costs for the rest of the session. On 2.1.70+, prompt cache reuse is preserved regardless of when MCP servers connect.
ToolSearch Reliability Fix (Claude Code 2.1.70+): Empty model responses after ToolSearch are fixed. The server was rendering tool schemas with system-prompt-style tags that could confuse models into stopping early. ToolSearch-heavy workflows (many deferred MCP tools) are now more reliable.
When NOT To Use
- Simple tool calls that don't chain
- Context pressure is low and tools are fast
Core Hub Responsibilities
- Orchestrates MCP code execution workflow
- Routes to appropriate specialized modules
- Coordinates MECW compliance across submodules
- Manages token budget allocation for submodules
Required TodoWrite Items
mcp-code-execution:assess-workflowmcp-code-execution:route-to-modulesmcp-code-execution:coordinate-mecwmcp-code-execution:synthesize-results
Step 1 – Assess Workflow (mcp-code-execution:assess-workflow)
Workflow Classification
def classify_workflow_for_mecw(workflow):
"""Determine appropriate MCP modules and MECW strategy"""
if has_tool_chains(workflow) and workflow.complexity == 'high':
return {
'modules': ['mcp-subagents', 'mcp-patterns'],
'mecw_strategy': 'aggressive',
'token_budget': 600
}
elif workflow.data_size > '10k_rows':
return {
'modules': ['mcp-patterns', 'mcp-validation'],
'mecw_strategy': 'moderate',
'token_budget': 400
}
else:
return {
'modules': ['mcp-patterns'],
'mecw_strategy': 'conservative',
'token_budget': 200
}
MECW Risk Assessment
Delegate to mcp-validation module for detailed risk analysis:
def delegate_mecw_assessment(workflow):
return mcp_validation_assess_mecw_risk(
workflow,
hub_allocated_tokens=self.token_budget * 0.5
)
Step 2 – Route to Modules (mcp-code-execution:route-to-modules)
Module Orchestration
class MCPExecutionHub:
def __init__(self):
self.modules = {
'mcp-subagents': MCPSubagentsModule(),
'mcp-patterns': MCPatternsModule(),
'mcp-validation': MCPValidationModule()
}
def execute_workflow(self, workflow, classification):
results = []
# Execute modules in optimal order
for module_name in classification['modules']:
module = self.modules[module_name]
result = module.execute(
workflow,
mecw_budget=classification['token_budget'] //
len(classification['modules'])
)
results.append(result)
return self.synthesize_results(results)
Step 3 – Coordinate MECW (mcp-code-execution:coordinate-mecw)
Cross-Module MECW Management
- Monitor total context usage across all modules
- Enforce 50% context rule globally
- Coordinate external state management
- Implement MECW emergency protocols
Step 4 – Synthesize Results (mcp-code-execution:synthesize-results)
Result Integration
def synthesize_module_results(module_results):
"""Combine module results into a single status dict."""
return {
'status': 'completed',
'token_savings': calculate_savings(module_results),
'mecw_compliance': verify_mecw_rules(module_results),
'hallucination_risk': assess_hallucination_prevention(module_results),
'results': consolidate_results(module_results)
}
Module Integration
Available Modules
- See
modules/mcp-coordination.mdfor cross-module orchestration - See
modules/mcp-patterns.mdfor common MCP execution patterns - See
modules/mcp-subagents.mdfor subagent delegation strategies - See
modules/mcp-validation.mdfor MECW compliance validation
With Context Optimization Hub
- Receives high-level MECW strategy from context-optimization
- Returns detailed execution metrics and compliance data
- Coordinates token budget allocation
Performance Skills Integration
- uses python-performance-optimization through mcp-patterns
- Aligns with cpu-gpu-performance for resource-aware execution
- validates optimizations maintain MECW compliance
Emergency Protocols
Hub-Level Emergency Response
When MECW limits exceeded:
- Delegates immediately to mcp-validation for risk assessment
- Route to mcp-subagents for further decomposition
- Apply compression through mcp-patterns
- Return minimal summary to preserve context
Success Metrics
- Workflow Success Rate: >95% successful module coordination
- MECW Compliance: 100% adherence to 50% context rule
- Token Efficiency: Maintain >80% savings vs traditional methods
- Module Coordination: <5% overhead for hub orchestration
Exit Criteria
- Workflow classified into one of the three MECW strategies
(aggressive/moderate/conservative) with the correct module
roster (
mcp-subagents,mcp-patterns,mcp-validation) selected based on tool-chain length and data size - Context usage remains at or below 50% of the total window throughout the workflow; any breach triggers the hub-level emergency response (delegate to mcp-validation, route to mcp-subagents, apply compression)
-
synthesize_module_resultsreturns a dict with all four keys:status,token_savings,mecw_compliance,hallucination_risk - Token savings reported at the end of the workflow are greater than 80% compared to running the same workflow via direct Bash tool chaining