Refactoring assistant
Skill AsiaOstrich/universal-dev-standards/skills/refactoring-assistant
[UDS] Guide refactoring decisions and strategy selection, including the refactor-versus-rewrite call. Use when: code has become hard to change, choosing between tactical and architectural refactoring, working safely inside legacy code. Not for: moving to a different framework or major version — use /migrate; clearing debug artifacts and dead code — use /sweep. Keywords: refactor, rewrite, strangler, legacy code, technical debt, code smell, 重構, 重寫, 技術債.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add AsiaOstrich/universal-dev-standards --skill refactoring-assistantAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
SKILL.md
4.3 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Refactoring Assistant | 重構助手
Guide refactoring decisions, recommend strategies, and provide step-by-step execution workflows.
引導重構決策、推薦策略,並提供逐步執行工作流程。
Usage | 使用方式
| Command | Purpose | 用途 |
|---|---|---|
/refactor | Start interactive refactoring guide | 啟動互動式重構引導 |
/refactor decide | Run refactor vs. rewrite decision tree | 執行重構 vs 重寫決策樹 |
/refactor tactical | Suggest tactical (daily) strategies | 建議戰術性(日常)策略 |
/refactor strategic | Guide strategic/architectural refactoring | 引導戰略性/架構重構 |
/refactor legacy | Legacy code safety strategies | 遺留程式碼安全策略 |
/refactor debt | Technical debt assessment | 技術債評估 |
Strategy Quick Reference | 策略快速參考
Tactical Strategies (Daily) | 戰術性策略
| Strategy | When to Use | 使用時機 |
|---|---|---|
| Preparatory Refactoring | Before adding a blocked feature | 新增被阻擋的功能之前 |
| Boy Scout Rule | During any maintenance work | 任何維護工作中 |
| Red-Green-Refactor | TDD development cycle | TDD 開發循環 |
Strategic Strategies (Architectural) | 戰略性策略
| Strategy | When to Use | 使用時機 |
|---|---|---|
| Strangler Fig | Replacing entire system gradually | 逐步替換整個系統 |
| Anti-Corruption Layer | Integrating with legacy system | 與遺留系統整合 |
| Branch by Abstraction | Shared code refactoring on trunk | 在主幹上重構共享程式碼 |
Safety Strategies (Legacy) | 安全防護策略
| Strategy | When to Use | 使用時機 |
|---|---|---|
| Characterization Tests | Before any legacy refactoring | 任何遺留程式碼重構之前 |
| Scratch Refactoring | Understanding black-box code | 理解黑盒程式碼 |
| Finding Seams | Injecting test doubles into legacy | 在遺留程式碼中注入測試替身 |
Workflow | 工作流程
- Assess - Identify code to refactor, evaluate test coverage
- Decide - Run decision tree (refactor vs. rewrite) if needed
- Select strategy - Choose appropriate strategy based on scope and risk
- Execute - Follow step-by-step workflow with safety checks
- Verify - Run tests to confirm behavior is preserved
Usage Examples | 使用範例
User: /refactor src/legacy-auth/
AI: Analyzing src/legacy-auth/...
Test coverage: 23% — recommending safety-first approach.
Suggested strategy: Characterization Tests + Preparatory Refactoring
User: /refactor decide
AI: Let me help you decide whether to refactor or rewrite.
Question 1: Is the code currently working in production? [Y/N]
Next Steps Guidance | 下一步引導
After /refactor completes, the AI assistant should suggest:
重構完成。建議下一步 / Refactoring complete. Suggested next steps:
- 執行
/checkin通過品質關卡 ⭐ Recommended / 推薦 — Pass quality gates- 執行
/coverage確認重構後覆蓋率不下降 — Verify coverage not decreased- 執行
/commit提交重構變更 — Commit the refactoring changes
Reference | 參考
- Detailed guide: guide.md
- Core standard: refactoring-standards.md
AI Agent Behavior | AI 代理行為
完整的 AI 行為定義請參閱對應的命令文件:
/refactorFor complete AI agent behavior definition, see the corresponding command file:
/refactor