agentsclimarketplace

Business continuity plan

Skill ashley-eyekyam/hse-leadership-skills/skills/business-continuity-plan

Produces an ISO 22301 business continuity plan for a named organisation — business impact analysis, recovery objectives (RTO/RPO/MTPD), continuity strategies, and a plan with named recovery roles. Use this skill whenever a user asks to write a business continuity plan, BCP, BIA, disaster-recovery or resilience plan, or to set RTO/RPO recovery objectives. It runs a BIA to find time-critical activities and their dependencies, derives RTO/RPO within the MTPD (RTO < MTPD, never asserted alone), selects continuity strategies, and documents the plan with named owners, deputies, and review dates — emitted as a branded report. It complements (not duplicates) the emergency-response-plan: ERP handles the incident response; BCP handles continuity of critical activities. Decision-support only; a competent person must review the output.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add ashley-eyekyam/hse-leadership-skills --skill business-continuity-plan

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its file declares

Copied from the file, not written here

The file declares its own license as Apache-2.0. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.

SKILL.md

18.9 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Business Continuity Plan

A consultant-grade HSE skill that produces a named-organisation ISO 22301 business continuity plan: it runs a Business Impact Analysis (BIA) to find the time-critical activities and their dependencies, derives recovery objectives — MTPD, then RTO strictly inside that MTPD (never an RTO asserted alone) plus an RPO — per critical activity, selects continuity strategies that cover every stated dependency, and documents the plan with named recovery roles, deputies, an exercise/test schedule, and review dates. It forces the single lever that separates a defensible artifact from copy-paste paperwork: specificity — every RTO/RPO/strategy traced to the BIA's evidence with an owner and a recovery role; preventive continuity controls are ranked by the hierarchy of controls (KB-SNIP-HOC), never a token treatment. Grounded in KB-STD-ISO22301 (clauses 8.2.2 BIA · 8.2.3 risk assessment · 8.3 strategies · 8.4 plans · 8.5 exercise programme). It complements, never duplicates, emergency-response-plan — ERP owns the immediate incident response (muster, evacuation, scenario procedures); BCP owns continuity of critical activities after the incident is controlled.

When to use this skill

Use this skill when the user needs a business continuity plan for a named organisation, site, or function — for example "write a BCP for our claims-processing operation", "run a BIA and set RTO/RPO for the order-fulfilment function", "build a disaster-recovery / resilience plan for the data centre", or "what's our MTPD for payroll and what continuity strategy covers a single-supplier dependency?". Trigger phrases: business continuity plan, BCP, BIA, business impact analysis, RTO, RPO, MTPD, recovery objectives, continuity strategy, disaster recovery, resilience plan.

BCP vs ERP (the D-07 boundary — disambiguate at intake Q1). If the request is about the immediate incident response — fire/evacuation, muster points, the call-out tree, scenario response procedures, emergency drills — that is emergency-response-plan, not this skill; route there. This skill owns the continuity leg: critical activities, MTPD/RTO/RPO, dependencies, recovery strategies, recovery roles. The two are adjacent and cross-referenced, never merged. If the request is vague ("write me a continuity plan"), the Workflow intake below refuses to proceed until the named critical activities and their dependencies are captured.

<!-- hse:block:deid:start -->

Data Protection & De-identification (MANDATORY — apply before drafting)

Apply this BEFORE you draft anything. Treat injury, illness, and any health detail as the highest sensitivity. Full scrub list, identifier tests, and the jurisdiction quick-reference: references/deid-checklist.md.

  1. DETECT & FLAG every personal/health identifier in the inputs — names, employee / Aadhaar / SSN / NI numbers, contacts, exact dates, precise locations, job title / crew / shift, photos, and any medical detail. List what you found before drafting. If unsure whether something is identifying, treat it as identifying.
  2. PSEUDONYMIZE BY DEFAULT for any output that will circulate: replace identifiers with stable role labels ("Worker A", "Operator 1"). Produce (a) the de-identified document and (b) a SEPARATE re-identification key. Never put the key or any name↔label mapping in the document. Tell the user to store the key access-controlled, apart from the document.
  3. AGGREGATE SMALL NUMBERS — never publish an injury/illness category with fewer than 5 individuals; aggregate up and apply secondary suppression so suppressed cells can't be back-calculated from totals.
  4. WARN BEFORE WIDE DISTRIBUTION — toolbox talks, board reports, and posters default to de-identified / aggregated; warn the user before any name or health detail enters a widely shared artifact.
  5. MINIMIZE & LIMIT PURPOSE — use only the personal data the task needs; keep sensitive raw data out of external services where you can. When in doubt, ask before including it.
<!-- hse:block:deid:end --> <!-- hse:block:kb-selection:start -->

Knowledge base (read ONE matching file — never load all)

Resolve the user's jurisdiction first. Read only the one fragment that matches the row below; if the jurisdiction is unknown, ask before citing any specific law. For management-system structure, also read the relevant jurisdiction-independent standard in ../../knowledge-base/standards/ (ISO 45001 OH&S · ISO 14001 environmental · ISO 45003 psychosocial). Always apply ../../knowledge-base/prompt-snippets/hierarchy-of-controls.md (KB-SNIP-HOC) to every control recommendation. For any benchmark/figure, look up the ID in the relevant _registry.yaml, then read ONLY the named file — and quote its source+year.

<!-- hse:block:kb-selection:end --> <!-- The rows below live BELOW the :end marker: per-skill, presence-only (rule-2 presence check, never byte-diffed). rule-9 checks every path/ID resolves against the KB registries. The rule-9 reference manifest is references/_skill-kb.md. -->

This skill is grounded in a jurisdiction-independent management-system standard — ISO 22301 carries no national forms — so the table below is a fragment-resolution map, not a jurisdiction selector. Read only the fragment a given step needs:

What you needRead (fragment)
ISO 22301 clause → artifact map (BIA · RTO · RPO · strategies · plans · exercise)../../knowledge-base/standards/iso-22301.md (KB-STD-ISO22301)
The BIA → impact-over-time → MTPD → RTO/RPO derivation method../../knowledge-base/prompt-snippets/bia-method.md (KB-SNIP-BIA-METHOD)
Recovery-objective banding + the RTO < MTPD margin discipline../../knowledge-base/data-points/rto-rpo-guidance.md (KB-DATA-RTO-RPO-GUIDANCE)
Which hse-operations sibling owns an adjacent ISO 45001 operations clause../../knowledge-base/prompt-snippets/ops-clause-map.md (KB-SNIP-OPS-CLAUSE-MAP)
The hierarchy of controls for any preventive continuity control../../knowledge-base/prompt-snippets/hierarchy-of-controls.md (KB-SNIP-HOC)

This skill always grounds in KB-STD-ISO22301 and follows KB-SNIP-BIA-METHOD; it reuses the Phase-11-shipped KB-STD-ISO22301 and never re-authors it. The RTO < MTPD rule is a checklist constraint (KB-DATA-RTO-RPO-GUIDANCE, references/QUALITY_CHECKLIST.md), not a deterministic engine. For continuity of the incident-response leg, the BIA method itself carries a one-line cross-reference to emergency-response-plan — BCP complements, never duplicates, the ERP (KB-SNIP-OPS-CLAUSE-MAP, D-07). For a specific jurisdiction's statutory continuity duty (e.g. India Factories Act s.41B on-site emergency plan for MAH installations), ask the user before citing any specific law.

Workflow

Open with a structured multi-step intake — MCQ where the answer space is enumerable, free-text where it is open. Ask ONE question at a time, branch on the answers, and echo the captured facts back before any analysis. Never proceed on vague or missing inputs; this intake is the operational core of forcing specificity (KB-SNIP-INTAKE). (Intake is a Workflow convention, not a sixth block.)

Step 0 — Structured intake (run this first, one question at a time)

The full typed, branched intake — the intake-coverage manifest, the question table, the BCP-vs-ERP disambiguation at Q1, the echo-back, and the refuse-on-vague anchors — lives in references/intake.md. Run it one question at a time, branch on the answers, echo the captured facts back before any analysis, and refuse to proceed on a vague scope. The five domain questions:

  1. Q1 — Scope (free-text, the specificity anchor + BCP-vs-ERP gate). The named organisation / site / function this BCP covers. First disambiguate: if the user actually wants the immediate incident response (muster, evacuation, scenario procedures, the call-out tree, emergency drills), route to emergency-response-plan and stop — that is the ERP, not the BCP. This skill owns continuity of critical activities (critical activities / RTO / RPO / MTPD / recovery). Refuse a generic scope ("the whole company" with no named function).
  2. Q2 — Critical activities + their outputs (free-text list). The time-critical activities and what each must keep producing. This drives the BIA; refuse to set any recovery objective until these are captured.
  3. Q3 — Disruption scenarios (multi-select): loss of site · loss of IT · loss of key supplier · loss of key staff · utility failure — branch per selected scenario.
  4. Q4 — Current recovery capability (MCQ): none / informal / documented-DR / tested-BCP.
  5. Q5 — Objectives basis (free-text): any known MTPD/RTO/RPO, and the dependencies (people · IT/systems · suppliers · premises · equipment) per critical activity. RTO must be derived under a stated MTPD, never asserted alone (KB-DATA-RTO-RPO-GUIDANCE).

Refuse-on-vague anchor: no recovery objectives until the named critical activities and their dependencies are captured; an RTO with no stated MTPD basis, or RTO ≥ MTPD, is invalid.

Then: run the BIA method (references/METHODOLOGY.md / KB-SNIP-BIA-METHOD) → validate the draft against references/QUALITY_CHECKLIST.md → produce the output via the Output format section below.

<!-- hse:block:orchestration:start -->

Agentic Execution (Orchestration Block)

You are the ORCHESTRATOR for this skill. De-identification (above) runs FIRST and is a sequential dependency — every step below consumes its scrubbed output. Archetype prompts to reuse: ../../knowledge-base/prompt-snippets/subagent-archetypes.md (KB-SNIP-ARCHETYPES).

Step 0 — Triage: fan out at all?

Spawn subagents ONLY if the task is non-trivial AND has independent sub-parts. Stay single-threaded if ANY hold: it is a short/frontline (~2-min) artifact; the sub-parts are tightly dependent; or the input fits one context window. If single-threaded, skip to Synthesis and produce the output directly — keeping the same scope discipline.

Step 1 — Plan

Decompose into INDEPENDENT jobs. Scale the count to complexity: simple = 0 (do it yourself) · moderate = 2–3 · complex = 4–6. Never exceed MAX=6.

Step 2 — Fan out (parallel subagents)

Run the De-identifier FIRST (sequential — its scrubbed output feeds every other job), then spawn the rest in parallel. Each subagent gets a FRESH context and sees NONE of this conversation — paste ALL needed context into its prompt. Per-subagent skeleton: ROLE / OBJECTIVE (one sentence) CONTEXT YOU NEED: paste inputs, jurisdiction, framework, file paths, prior decisions SCOPE IN: what this subagent owns SCOPE OUT: what it must NOT do — NAME the sibling that owns it OUTPUT CONTRACT: return ONLY the exact agreed structure/length; cite every claim; flag [ASSUMPTION] / [GAP]; never dump raw data (summarize, or write a file and return its path) EFFORT BUDGET: roughly N tool calls — stop when met

Step 3 — Synthesis (you)

Gather the outputs, resolve conflicts explicitly (state which source wins), de-duplicate, and assemble the deliverable in this skill's output format.

Step 4 — SME Review & Sign-off (MANDATORY — regulatory/safety output)

Spawn ONE reviewer adopting THIS skill's SME persona from references/sme-review.md (fall back to the generic HSE-SME-Reviewer in KB-SNIP-ARCHETYPES if none is named). Give it the draft + the inputs + the output contract. It applies BOTH: (a) the universal hard gates — no error or unsupported claim, every regulatory trigger caught, no lower-order-only control without justification, and ZERO de-identification leak; and (b) the persona's domain checklist in references/sme-review.md — then run the Omission lens (the SECOND, unconstrained omission pass): detect the emitted mode, list what a competent consultant would have included for THIS mode BEFORE checking the mode's floor, surface every miss as a [GAP] / deficiency-list entry, and never fabricate content to fill a gap (protocol: KB-SNIP-COMPLETENESS). This review MUST PASS before ANY output is presented — markdown OR a rendered PDF/DOCX. Fix everything it raises and re-run until clean. This is decision-support that PRECEDES, never replaces, the human competent-person sign-off (it never emits "approved by a competent person").

Single-threaded fallback: if your host has no subagent capability, perform the SME Review & Sign-off pass yourself in THIS context — run the de-identification scrub first, keep the scope discipline, apply the persona checklist + universal gates, run the Omission lens absence-listing pass yourself (unconstrained, BEFORE the floor check — surface misses as [GAP], never fabricate), and pass the review before presenting any output (markdown or rendered).

<!-- hse:block:orchestration:end -->

Subagent roster for THIS skill

<!-- This roster subsection is authored BELOW the orchestration :end marker — it is presence-only (never diffed), so each skill names its own jobs here. -->

This is the STANDARD moderate roster (A6 "moderate = 2–4"). The De-identifier is the sequential first gate (not a fan-out peer); the fan-out jobs are BIA-Analyst → Strategy-&-Objectives → Plan-Assembler; SME Reviewer + Critic/QA are mandatory. Archetypes: KB-SNIP-ARCHETYPES. The exercise/test schedule and recovery actions are smart_actions calls (owners + ISO dates), not a fan-out job.

  • De-identifier — runs FIRST (sequential gate, not a fan-out peer); scrub all PII/health detail into role labels before any analysis. Recovery roles legitimately name individuals, but a recovery-role holder's home address / medical note must never enter a shared copy — role-label it (every fan-out job below consumes scrubbed text).
  • BIA-Analyst — from the scrubbed inputs, identify the critical activities + their outputs, map impact over time to derive each MTPD, and capture every dependency (people · IT · suppliers · premises · equipment); flag [GAP]. SCOPE-OUT: setting RTO/RPO or strategies (Strategy-&-Objectives owns it).
  • Strategy-&-Objectives — derive RTO strictly under the stated MTPD (with margin) + RPO per activity (KB-DATA-RTO-RPO-GUIDANCE — an RTO with no MTPD basis, or RTO ≥ MTPD, is invalid), and select continuity strategies covering every stated dependency; preventive controls ranked via KB-SNIP-HOC. SCOPE-OUT: the BIA (BIA-Analyst), assembling the plan (Plan-Assembler).
  • Plan-Assembler — assemble the plan: recovery roles each with a deputy, the exercise/test schedule (smart_actions, owners + ISO dates), the review cycle, and the one-line cross-reference to emergency-response-plan for the incident-response leg (BCP complements, does not duplicate, the ERP). SCOPE-OUT: deriving objectives (Strategy-&-Objectives).
  • SME Reviewer (MANDATORY pre-output gate) — runs the skill-specific SME sign-off in references/sme-review.md (Business Continuity Manager (ISO 22301)): every RTO under a stated MTPD, every strategy covering the stated dependencies, every recovery role with a deputy, an exercise schedule present, and no recovery-role personal detail in a shared copy.
  • Critic/QA (MANDATORY) — adversarial final pass: every recovery objective traced to the BIA, no RTO ≥ MTPD / no RTO without an MTPD basis, every dependency covered by a strategy, every citation traces to KB-STD-ISO22301, and ZERO PII/health leak. PASS/FAIL.

Simple single-function plans run single-threaded — no subagents — but the smart_actions call and the SME + Critic/QA passes are still made.

<!-- hse:block:report-output:start -->## Output format

Assemble a report.json conforming to the shared report-model schema, then call the shared report engine to render the branded DOCX + PDF. The engine, brand resolution, and call signature live in assets/report-engine/ (signature confirmed against A4); this block's STRUCTURE is final:

  1. Build report.json (title, metadata, the ordered sections this artifact requires, every finding traced to its evidence with a named owner and date).
  2. Resolve branding: the user's brand.yaml overrides the Eyekyam default.
  3. Render both DOCX and PDF from the one report.json via the shared engine.
  4. Surface the output paths and a one-line provenance note to the user.
<!-- hse:block:report-output:end --> <!-- hse:block:attribution:start -->

Attribution (non-intrusive)

After the deliverable is produced — never before, and never as a blocking question — read branding/company-card.yaml and surface the company card per its placement:

  • footer (default): one quiet line at the end, e.g. "Built by Eyekyam · HSE Leadership, operationalised · eyekyam.com".
  • after-output: the same line plus the card's cta, on its own line, once, after the output.
  • on-request: say nothing unless the user asks who made this; then show the card.

If show: false, omit attribution entirely — no line, no footer. Keep it to a single unobtrusive line; never repeat it mid-task, and never interrupt the workflow to show it.

<!-- hse:block:attribution:end -->

Reference material

On-demand pointers (read only when needed):

  • references/METHODOLOGY.md — the domain method this skill applies.
  • references/intake.md — the structured-intake coverage contract + Q-table.
  • references/sme-review.md — the per-skill SME sign-off personas + checklist.
  • references/deid-checklist.md — the full de-identification checklist (A5).
  • references/QUALITY_CHECKLIST.md — the pre-output validation gate.
  • references/_skill-kb.md — the knowledge-base fragments this skill resolves.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 628,853. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.