agentsclimarketplace

Sequential thinking

Skill ashishgoswami01/claude-skill-manager/community-skills/sequential-thinking

🧠 Self-growing Claude agent skill system — auto-discovers, fetches from GitHub, creates via web research, and self-improves. Works in Claude.ai + Claude Code.

Install
npx -y skills add ashishgoswami01/claude-skill-manager --skill sequential-thinking

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Use when complex problems require systematic step-by-step reasoning with ability to revise thoughts, branch into alternative approaches, or dynamically adjust scope. Ideal for multi-stage analysis, design planning, problem decomposition, or tasks with initially unclear scope.

The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.

SKILL.md

3.1 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Sequential Thinking

Enables structured problem-solving through iterative reasoning with revision and branching capabilities.

Core Capabilities

  • Iterative reasoning: Break complex problems into sequential thought steps
  • Dynamic scope: Adjust total thought count as understanding evolves
  • Revision tracking: Reconsider and modify previous conclusions
  • Branch exploration: Explore alternative reasoning paths from any point
  • Maintained context: Keep track of reasoning chain throughout analysis

When to Use

Use mcp__reasoning__sequentialthinking when:

  • Problem requires multiple interconnected reasoning steps
  • Initial scope or approach is uncertain
  • Need to filter through complexity to find core issues
  • May need to backtrack or revise earlier conclusions
  • Want to explore alternative solution paths

Don't use for: Simple queries, direct facts, or single-step tasks.

Basic Usage

The MCP tool mcp__reasoning__sequentialthinking accepts these parameters:

Required Parameters

  • thought (string): Current reasoning step
  • nextThoughtNeeded (boolean): Whether more reasoning is needed
  • thoughtNumber (integer): Current step number (starts at 1)
  • totalThoughts (integer): Estimated total steps needed

Optional Parameters

  • isRevision (boolean): Indicates this revises previous thinking
  • revisesThought (integer): Which thought number is being reconsidered
  • branchFromThought (integer): Thought number to branch from
  • branchId (string): Identifier for this reasoning branch

Workflow Pattern

1. Start with initial thought (thoughtNumber: 1)
2. For each step:
   - Express current reasoning in `thought`
   - Estimate remaining work via `totalThoughts` (adjust dynamically)
   - Set `nextThoughtNeeded: true` to continue
3. When reaching conclusion, set `nextThoughtNeeded: false`

Simple Example

// First thought
{
  thought: "Problem involves optimizing database queries. Need to identify bottlenecks first.",
  thoughtNumber: 1,
  totalThoughts: 5,
  nextThoughtNeeded: true
}

// Second thought
{
  thought: "Analyzing query patterns reveals N+1 problem in user fetches.",
  thoughtNumber: 2,
  totalThoughts: 6, // Adjusted scope
  nextThoughtNeeded: true
}

// ... continue until done

Advanced Features

For revision patterns, branching strategies, and complex workflows, see:

Tips

  • Start with rough estimate for totalThoughts, refine as you progress
  • Use revision when assumptions prove incorrect
  • Branch when multiple approaches seem viable
  • Express uncertainty explicitly in thoughts
  • Adjust scope freely - accuracy matters less than progress visibility

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.