Curiosity bio story
Public-safe skills and schemas for turning private work evidence into career signal
npx -y skills add ArthurZakirov/ProofStack --skill curiosity_bio_storyAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Create curiosity-driven bios, profile About sections, article intros, and story-driven posts using measurable hooks, unusual contrast, mechanism, reader benefit, and CTA.
SKILL.md
4.7 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Curiosity Bio & Story Skill
Use this when
Use this skill to write or revise:
- LinkedIn About sections
- personal bios
- founder bios
- profile summaries
- article introductions
- story-driven posts
- portfolio homepage copy
- creator profile copy
Core principle
A good bio is not a chronological autobiography.
A good bio creates a curiosity gap:
How did this person achieve [specific result] despite [unlikely starting point or constraint]?
Then it answers that gap with a transferable mechanism and shows why the reader should care.
Recommended structure
Use this order:
- Numeric curiosity hook
- Unusual starting-point gap
- Question that creates the knowledge gap
- Reader benefit
- Operating model / mechanism
- Proof examples
- CTA or positioning close
1. Numeric curiosity hook
Open with numbers and contrast.
Template:
In [time period], I helped/contributed to [measurable outcomes] despite [constraint].
Examples:
In my first [time period] as [role], I contributed to [outcome 1], [outcome 2], and [outcome 3].
I helped move [metric] from [before] to [after] in [timeframe] by [mechanism].
Avoid weak openers:
I am passionate about...
I have always loved...
I am an innovative...
2. Unusual starting-point gap
Make the gap concise and dramatic.
Template:
The unusual part: I did this without [expected credential/experience/resource].
Keep it short. Do not over-describe everything the person lacked.
Good:
I did this without a formal background in the exact stack, prior full-time experience, or previous roles in the same domain.
Avoid:
I had no experience with tool A, tool B, tool C, tool D, framework E, framework F, process G, system H...
Use 1 sentence for the gap, 1 sentence for context.
3. Knowledge-gap question
Ask the question the reader now wants answered.
Template:
So what made the ramp-up possible?
Stronger template:
If this worked in an unfamiliar stack/domain, what made it transferable — and how could the same mechanism help your team?
This must do two jobs:
- explain the surprising result
- make the reader see a benefit for themselves
4. Operating model / mechanism
Give the method in named steps.
Keep steps short. Prefer 3–6 steps.
Good mechanism names:
- Decode the request behind the request
- Context-engineer the problem
- Find what already works
- Compose the solution
- Harden the learning
- Make the solution land
Avoid generic mechanism names:
- Work hard
- Communicate well
- Use AI
- Be proactive
5. Proof examples
Proof should be measurable.
Strong proof contains:
action + metric + timeframe + mechanism + why it mattered
Examples:
• Shifted a roadmap from 41 to 770 hours of saveable work — ~19× more leverage.
• Ran 4 workshops for ~20 engineers and supported targeted 1:1 onboarding for senior stakeholders.
6. CTA / close
A bio can ask for action. The CTA should connect to the reader's pain.
Templates:
Follow me for practical posts on [topic], [topic], and [topic] — or message me if you want to discuss how this applies to your situation.
If your team is dealing with [pain], I write about how to turn it into [outcome].
Word choice rules
Prefer:
- adopted systems
- measurable outcome
- real bottleneck
- manual work
- shipped capability
- reusable capability
- data-backed priority
- belief-creating demo
- make the solution land
Avoid:
- passionate about AI
- cutting-edge
- scale impact
- leverage synergies
- innovative solutions
- thought leader
- AI enthusiast
Output templates
About-section skeleton
In [time period], I contributed to [measurable outcomes].
The unusual part:
I did this without [expected credential/experience].
So the real question is:
If [surprising result] was possible in [unfamiliar context], what made it transferable — and how could the same operating system help [reader/audience]?
My loop:
1. [Step]
[Short explanation]
2. [Step]
[Short explanation]
...
[CTA]
Article/post intro skeleton
Most people approach [problem] by [common method].
That works until [failure mode].
The better question is not [surface question].
It is [deeper question].
Here is the framework I use:
Quality bar
The reader should know:
- what was achieved
- why it is surprising
- what mechanism explains it
- why it could apply beyond the original case
- what they should do next