Data security
Check whether data is safe to share with an external tool. Say "is this safe to paste", "can I send this to <tool>", or "classify this data". Fires before pasting, uploading, forwarding, or sending data to an external tool or AI model. Classifies the data and checks it against the user's data-handling policy.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add ARCASSystems/FounderOS --skill data-securityAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 5 stars5 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
3.6 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Data Security
Runs on: reasoning - reads your files and reasons; any capable agent can run this.
Block unsafe data movement before it leaves the user's control.
When To Run
- The founder is about to paste content into an AI tool.
- A file is about to be uploaded to an external service.
- Client, employee, financial, legal, health, or personal data is involved.
- The tool is new, unlisted, or consumer-grade.
- The user asks "can I paste this" or "is this safe to upload".
Pre-Read
Read the first available policy source. Skip a source silently if it does not exist; do not error out.
rules/data-handling.md(likely absent on a fresh install - skip if missing)rules/approval-gates.md(or fall back totemplates/rules/approval-gates.md)stack.json(lists which tools the user has approved)context/clients.md(per-client restrictions, if any are noted)
If none of the above exist or yield a policy, use the default matrix below and tell the user it is a fallback.
Data Classes
| Class | Examples | Default Tool Access |
|---|---|---|
| Public | Published posts, public pages, public case studies | Any tool |
| Internal | SOPs, internal notes, non-sensitive business plans | Paid tools with business terms |
| Client general | Client name, project scope, public deal existence | Tools with no-training terms or business agreement |
| Client sensitive | Strategy, financials, private messages, personal data | Approved tools only |
| Regulated | Health, legal, banking, tax, ID, payroll, protected personal data | Specific approved systems only |
If ambiguous, choose the more restrictive class.
Tool Classes
| Tool Class | Examples | Allowed Data |
|---|---|---|
| Approved secure | Enterprise or API tools listed in the user's policy | Up to the policy limit |
| Business paid | Paid tools with no-training or business terms | Public, internal, client general if policy allows |
| Consumer or free | Free chat tools, unapproved browser tools | Public only |
| Unknown | Anything not listed | Public only |
Procedure
- Identify the data involved.
- Classify the highest-risk data class.
- Identify the destination tool.
- Classify the tool class from policy or fallback.
- Compare data class to tool class.
- Return
ALLOW,REDACT FIRST, orBLOCK. - For
BLOCK, name a safer tool or a local-only path.
Output Format
Data class: <class>
Tool class: <class>
Call: ALLOW | REDACT FIRST | BLOCK
Reason: <one sentence>
Safe path: <tool or local action>
Redaction Rule
Do not silently redact and proceed. Show what type of information must be removed, then ask the user to confirm the redacted version before using it.
Rules
- Client-sensitive and regulated data never go to unknown tools.
- Per-client restrictions override the generic matrix.
- A one-time exception needs explicit human approval and a log entry.