Vibers code review
Skill AravindS-Wick/aravindhan-skills/skills/library/vibers-code-review
148+ curated Claude AI skills — agent orchestration, security, multi-repo PRs, design, mobile & more. One-command install.
npx -y skills add AravindS-Wick/aravindhan-skills --skill vibers-code-reviewAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Human review workflow for AI-generated GitHub projects with spec-based feedback, security review, and follow-up PRs from the Vibers service.
SKILL.md
4.4 KB, ~1.1k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Vibers — Human Code Review for AI-Generated Projects
You push code. We review it against your spec, fix issues, and send a PR.
When to Use
Use this skill when:
- You want human review for AI-generated code pushed to GitHub
- You have a project spec and want reviewers to check implementation against it
- You want review feedback delivered as a follow-up PR with suggested fixes
- You are comfortable granting the Vibers service collaborator access to the repository
Quick Start (3 steps)
Step 1. Add collaborator
Go to your repo → Settings → Collaborators → Add marsiandeployer
Step 2. Add GitHub Action
Create .github/workflows/vibers.yml:
name: Vibers Code Review
on:
push:
branches: [main]
jobs:
review:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:
fetch-depth: 2
- uses: marsiandeployer/vibers-action@v1
with:
spec_url: 'https://docs.google.com/document/d/YOUR_SPEC_ID/edit'
telegram_contact: '@your_telegram'
| Parameter | What it does |
|---|---|
spec_url | Link to your spec (Google Doc, Notion, etc.). Must be publicly accessible (or "anyone with the link can view"). Without access to spec, review is impossible. |
review_scope | full (default), security, or spec-compliance |
telegram_contact | Your Telegram — we'll message you when review is ready |
Step 3. Add commit rules to your AI agent
Add this block to your project's CLAUDE.md, .cursorrules, or AGENTS.md:
## Commit messages
Every commit MUST include a "How to test" section in the body:
- Live URL to open and verify the change
- Step-by-step what to click/check
- Test credentials if login is required
- Expected result for each step
Example:
feat: Add user registration form
How to test:
- Open https://myapp.vercel.app/register
- Fill in email/password, submit
- Check that confirmation email arrives
- Try submitting with invalid email — should show error
- Login: [email protected] / demo123
Without "How to test" the reviewer has to guess what to verify, and the review takes longer.
Done. Now every push triggers a notification. You'll get a PR with fixes, usually within 24 hours.
What Happens After Setup
- You push code → GitHub Action sends us the commit details
- We read your spec and review changed files
- We fix issues directly in code and submit a PR
- You review the PR, merge or comment
We check: spec compliance, security (OWASP top 10), AI hallucinations (fake APIs/imports), logic bugs, UI issues.
We don't check: code style (use ESLint/Prettier), performance benchmarks, full QA (use Playwright/Cypress).
Limitations
- Requires a GitHub repository and adding
marsiandeployeras a collaborator - The referenced spec must be accessible to the review workflow
- The service is not a replacement for full QA, benchmark testing, or local security review
- Turnaround depends on the external Vibers review service
Pricing
| Plan | Rate | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Promo | $1/hour | Full review + PRs with fixes. We ask for honest feedback in return. |
| Standard | $15/hour | Full review + security audit + priority turnaround. |
No subscriptions. No contracts. Pay per review.
Feedback & Support
Send feedback directly from your agent:
curl -X POST https://vibers.onout.org/feedback \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d '{"message": "Your question or issue", "repo": "https://github.com/you/your-repo"}'
Both message and repo are required. Response: {"status": "accepted"}.
Contacts:
- Telegram: @onoutnoxon
- Moltbook: moltbook.com — user noxon
- GitHub: marsiandeployer
FAQ
Do I need an API key? No. Add collaborator + action, that's it.
What languages? JS/TS, Python, React, Next.js, Django, Flask, and more. If it's on GitHub, we review it.
What if I disagree with a fix? Comment on the PR. We discuss and adjust.
Can I use this without GitHub? Yes — write to Telegram with your code and spec.
Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most code review skills give in ~1.1k tokens
Counted across 610 of the 674 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-08-06
- push back with technical reasoning if wrongin 60 of 610, across 24 files
- ask for clarification on unclear itemsin 51 of 610, across 16 files
- fix critical issues immediatelyin 45 of 610, across 29 files
- implement one item at a timein 45 of 610, across 11 files
- group findings by severityin 44 of 610, across 43 files
- verify feedback against the codebasein 42 of 610, across 8 files
- dispatch a code reviewer subagentin 39 of 610, across 23 files
- fix important issues before proceedingin 37 of 610, across 22 files
- test each fix individuallyin 35 of 610, across 7 files
- reply in github comment threadsin 33 of 610, across 5 files
- check for security vulnerabilitiesin 31 of 610, across 27 files
- factualize corrections without over-explainingin 30 of 610, across 2 files
Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once. Length counted with cl100k_base; the agent that loads this file may tokenize it differently.