agentsclimarketplace

Outline agent

Skill Ar9av/PaperOrchestra/skills/outline-agent

An automated AI research-paper writer based off Google's PaperOrchestra paper's implementation through a skills - benchmark + autoraters using any coding agent (Claude Code, Cursor, Antigravity, Cline, Aider). No API keys, no LLM SDKs.

Install
npx -y skills add Ar9av/PaperOrchestra --skill outline-agent

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Step 1 of the PaperOrchestra pipeline (arXiv:2604.05018). Convert (idea.md, experimental_log.md, template.tex, conference_guidelines.md) into a strict JSON outline containing a plotting plan, literature search plan (Intro + Related Work), and section-level writing plan with citation hints. TRIGGER when the orchestrator delegates Step 1 or when the user asks to "outline a paper from raw materials" or "generate the paper structure".

SKILL.md

6.2 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Outline Agent (Step 1)

Faithful implementation of the Outline Agent from PaperOrchestra (Song et al., 2026, arXiv:2604.05018, App. F.1, pp. 40–44).

Cost: 1 LLM call.

Your task

Read four input files from the workspace and produce a single JSON object at workspace/outline.json with three top-level keys:

  • plotting_plan — array of figure objects
  • intro_related_work_plan — object with introduction_strategy and related_work_strategy
  • section_plan — array of section objects, each with section_title and subsections[]

How to do it

  1. Read the verbatim prompt at references/prompt.md. This is the exact Outline Agent system prompt from the paper. Use it as your system message.

  2. Prepend the Anti-Leakage Prompt from ../paper-orchestra/references/anti-leakage-prompt.md.

  3. Read the four input files:

    • workspace/inputs/idea.md
    • workspace/inputs/experimental_log.md
    • workspace/inputs/template.tex
    • workspace/inputs/conference_guidelines.md
  4. Synthesize across all four — the global instruction in the prompt is "Do not analyze inputs in isolation. You must synthesize information across all provided documents for every step."

  5. Emit a single JSON object following the schema in references/outline-schema.md. Cross-check against references/outline_schema.json (machine-readable).

  6. Save to workspace/outline.json.

  7. Validate:

    python skills/outline-agent/scripts/validate_outline.py workspace/outline.json
    

    If validation fails, fix the JSON and re-validate. Do not proceed to Step 2 or Step 3 with an invalid outline — every downstream agent depends on this schema.

  8. Append §1 to research_brief.md (see skills/shared/research_brief_template.md):

    After outline.json passes validation, append the §1 section to workspace/research_brief.md (create the file if absent). Template:

    ## §1 · Core Claim and Narrative
    _Written by: outline-agent, Step 1_
    
    **Core claim:** <one-sentence contribution>
    **Narrative tension:** <gap this paper resolves>
    **Key novelty framing:** <how the contribution is framed relative to prior work>
    **Outline decisions:**
    - Plotting plan: <N> figures
    - Related Work clusters: <names>
    - Section structure: <section titles>
    **Potential weaknesses flagged at outline stage:**
    - <any claim in idea.md that may be hard to support>
    

    This is a free-form prose append; no machine-readable schema required.

Hard rules from the prompt (do not violate)

These are excerpted from references/prompt.md. The validator enforces them.

Plotting plan (Directive 1)

  • plot_type MUST be exactly one of "plot" or "diagram".
  • data_source MUST be exactly one of "idea.md", "experimental_log.md", or "both".
  • aspect_ratio MUST be exactly one of: "1:1", "1:4", "2:3", "3:2", "3:4", "4:1", "4:3", "4:5", "5:4", "9:16", "16:9", "21:9".
  • figure_id MUST be a semantically meaningful snake_case identifier (e.g., fig_framework_overview, fig_ablation_study_parameter_sensitivity).
  • figure_id MUST NOT contain the word "Figure".

Intro / Related Work strategy (Directive 2)

  • Strictly separate Introduction (macro-level context, 10-20 papers, foundational + survey + impact) from Related Work (micro-level technical baselines, 30-50 papers, divided into 2-4 methodology clusters that directly compete with or precede the proposed approach).
  • For each Related Work cluster: provide methodology_cluster, sota_investigation_mission, limitation_hypothesis, limitation_search_queries, bridge_to_our_method.
  • CRITICAL TIMELINE RULE: Do not instruct searches for any papers published after {cutoff_date}. Derive cutoff_date from conference_guidelines.md (e.g., "ICLR 2025 → cutoff October 2024", "CVPR 2025 → cutoff November 2024"). If unspecified, default to one month before today's date.

Section plan (Directive 3)

  • Structural hierarchy: if Subsection X.1 is created, X.2 is mandatory. No orphaned subsections. Omit subsections entirely if a section does not require division.
  • Content specificity: each content_bullets entry must reference source materials concretely. AVOID "Describe the model". REQUIRE "Formalize the Temporal-Aware Attention mechanism using Eq. 3 from idea.md."
  • Mandatory citations: every dataset, optimizer, metric, and foundational architecture/model mentioned in idea.md or experimental_log.md MUST have a citation hint, no matter how ubiquitous (e.g., AdamW, ResNet, ImageNet, CLIP, Transformer, LLaMA, GPT, LLaVA).
  • Citation hint format:
    • If you know the exact author and title: "Author (Exact Paper Title)"
    • Otherwise: "research paper or technical report introducing '[Exact Model/Dataset/Metric Name]'"
    • Do NOT guess or hallucinate authors.

Output

Exactly one file: workspace/outline.json. No prose, no code blocks, no markdown. The Section Writing Agent and Literature Review Agent will parse this JSON directly.

See references/example-output.json for a complete worked example from the paper (App. F.1, pp. 43–44).

Resources

  • references/prompt.md — verbatim Outline Agent prompt from App. F.1
  • references/outline-schema.md — prose explanation of the schema
  • references/outline_schema.json — machine-readable JSON Schema
  • references/example-output.json — example output from the paper
  • references/allowed-values.md — enumerated allowed values for each enum field
  • scripts/validate_outline.py — JSON Schema validator
  • skills/shared/research_brief_template.mdNEW §1 schema; append after outline.json passes validation

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.