agentsclimarketplace

Replicate study

Skill Aperivue/medsci-skills/skills/replicate-study

Replicate an existing cohort study's methodology on a different database. Extracts study design from a source paper, maps variables to the target DB via harmonization table, generates analysis code, and produces a replication difference report.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add Aperivue/medsci-skills --skill replicate-study

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

SKILL.md

7.6 KB, ~1.7k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Replicate Study Skill

You are assisting a medical researcher in replicating an existing published study's methodology on a different database. This is a common research strategy: take a validated methodology from Paper A (e.g., NHIS cohort study) and apply it to Database B (e.g., KNHANES, NHANES, or another cohort) to produce a new paper with the same analytical rigor.

When to Use

  • Researcher has a published paper they want to replicate on their own data
  • Swapping exposure/outcome variables within the same DB
  • Cross-national replication (e.g., Korean study → US data, or vice versa)
  • Extending a single-institution study to a national cohort

Inputs

  1. Source paper: PDF, DOI, or markdown of the paper to replicate
  2. Target database path: CSV/SAS data file(s) to use
  3. Harmonization table (optional): CSV mapping source → target variables
    • Default: ${SKILL_DIR}/references/harmonization_knhanes_nhanes.csv (if KNHANES↔NHANES)

Reference Files

  • ${SKILL_DIR}/references/methodology_extraction_template.md — checklist for extracting study design
  • ${SKILL_DIR}/references/harmonization_knhanes_nhanes.csv — KNHANES↔NHANES variable mapping (67 rows)
  • ${SKILL_DIR}/references/harmonization_3country.csv — KNHANES+NHANES+CHNS 3-country mapping (45 rows, if available)
  • Upstream templates (read on demand):
    • medsci-skills/skills/write-paper/references/paper_types/nhis_cohort.md
    • medsci-skills/skills/write-paper/references/paper_types/cross_national.md
    • medsci-skills/skills/analyze-stats/references/analysis_guides/survey_weighted.md
    • medsci-skills/skills/analyze-stats/references/analysis_guides/propensity_score.md

Workflow

Phase 1: Source Paper Analysis

  1. Read the source paper (PDF → text, or markdown).
  2. Extract methodology using the extraction template:
    • Study design: cohort / cross-sectional / case-control
    • Database: name, country, years, N
    • Population: inclusion/exclusion criteria, age range
    • Exposure: variable name, definition, coding
    • Outcome: variable name, definition, coding
    • Covariates: full list with definitions
    • Statistical methods: regression type, adjustment model, subgroup analyses
    • Survey design: weights, strata, PSU (if applicable)
    • Sensitivity analyses: list all
  3. Output: structured extraction summary for user review.

Phase 2: Variable Mapping

  1. Load the harmonization table (CSV with columns: domain, concept, source_var, target_var, notes).
  2. For each extracted variable (exposure, outcome, covariates):
    • Find the matching row in the harmonization table
    • Flag: DIRECT_MATCH / RECODE_NEEDED / NOT_AVAILABLE / PROXY_AVAILABLE
  3. Generate a mapping report:
    • Green: directly available (no recoding)
    • Yellow: available but needs recoding (document transformation)
    • Red: not available in target DB (propose proxy or exclusion)
  4. Output: variable mapping table for user approval.

Phase 3: Code Generation

  1. Generate analysis code (Python with pandas + R via subprocess for survey-weighted): a. Data loading & cleaning: read target DB, apply inclusion/exclusion b. Variable derivation: recode variables per mapping table c. Survey design setup: define svydesign object (strata, PSU, weights) d. Table 1: demographics by exposure group (weighted) e. Main analysis: replicate the primary model (logistic/Cox/linear regression) f. Subgroup analyses: if specified in source paper g. Sensitivity analyses: replicate all listed in source paper
  2. Use /analyze-stats templates where available (survey_weighted, propensity_score).
  3. All code must be self-contained and reproducible.

Phase 4: Difference Report

Generate a structured difference report documenting:

SectionContent
Study DesignSame / Modified (explain)
DatabaseSource DB → Target DB (N, years, country)
PopulationInclusion/exclusion differences
Variable MappingFull mapping table with match status
Unavailable VariablesWhat's missing and how handled
Methodological DifferencesAny forced changes (e.g., BMI cutoffs, LDL calculation)
Expected DifferencesWhy results may differ (population, measurement, cultural)

Save as replication_report.md in the working directory.

Phase 5: Validation Checklist

Before reporting completion, verify:

  • All source paper covariates accounted for (mapped, proxied, or documented as missing)
  • Survey weights correctly applied (NEVER analyze unweighted if source used weights)
  • Obesity/BMI cutoffs match target population standards (Asian vs WHO)
  • Fasting requirements matched (fasting glucose, lipids)
  • Age restrictions applied correctly
  • Code runs without errors on target data
  • Output tables match source paper structure

Critical Rules

  1. Never pool data across surveys. Analyze each country's data with its own survey design.
  2. Document every deviation from the source methodology in the difference report.
  3. Asian BMI cutoffs (≥25 for obesity) when analyzing Korean data, even if source used WHO (≥30).
  4. LDL calculation: note if source used direct measurement vs Friedewald.
  5. Weighted analysis is mandatory for KNHANES/NHANES — never run unweighted models.
  6. IRB: note that KNHANES/NHANES are de-identified public data (IRB exempt or waived).
  7. Outdated source definitions: if the source paper used a pre-2023 definition that has since been superseded (e.g., NAFLD → MASLD 2023, CKD-EPI 2009 → 2021 race-free), call /define-variables to cross-check whether to mirror the legacy definition (pure replication) or upgrade to current (extension). Document the choice explicitly in the difference report.

Output Files

{working_dir}/
├── replication_report.md     — Structured difference report
├── variable_mapping.csv      — Variable mapping table with match status
├── analysis_code.py          — Main analysis script (Python + R calls)
├── analysis_code.R           — R script for survey-weighted analysis
└── results/
    ├── table1.csv            — Demographics table
    ├── main_results.csv      — Primary analysis results
    └── subgroup_results.csv  — Subgroup analysis results (if applicable)

Example Invocation

/replicate-study

Source paper: Joo 2026 (Psychiatry Research) — depression/diabetes cross-national
Target DB: /path/to/knhanes/HN18.csv
Harmonization: /path/to/harmonization_knhanes_nhanes.csv

Anti-Hallucination

  • Never fabricate variable names, dataset column names, or variable codings. If a variable mapping is uncertain, output [VERIFY: variable_name] and ask the user to confirm against the data dictionary.
  • Never fabricate statistical results — no invented p-values, effect sizes, confidence intervals, or sample sizes. All numbers must come from executed code output.
  • Never generate references from memory. Use /search-lit for all citations.
  • If a function, package, or API does not exist or you are unsure, say so explicitly rather than guessing.

What ships with it: 4 files

25.8 KB alongside SKILL.md

Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most learn study skills give in ~1.7k tokens

Counted across 545 of the 593 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-09-06

  • Treat the current directory as a teaching workspacein 20 of 545, across 17 files
  • Teach knowledge first then practice skillsin 19 of 545, across 16 files
  • Design lessons which build long-term retentionin 15 of 545, across 12 files
  • Save each lesson as a self-contained HTML filein 15 of 545, across 12 files
  • Question the user on why they want to learn thisin 15 of 545, across 12 files
  • Reuse components from the assets directoryin 14 of 545, across 11 files
  • Never trust your parametric knowledgein 13 of 545, across 10 files
  • Record user preferences in NOTES.mdin 11 of 545, across 8 files
  • Ground all teaching in the MISSION.md documentin 11 of 545, across 8 files
  • Save each lesson to the lessons directoryin 8 of 545
  • Question the user if the mission is unclearin 7 of 545
  • Gather primary sources onlyin 7 of 545, across 4 files

Said here and by no other author read

  • Read the source paper and extract methodology.
  • Load the harmonization table for variable mapping.
  • Generate analysis code for data loading and cleaning.
  • Define survey design setup with strata, PSU, and weights.
  • Generate a structured difference report.
  • Analyze each country's data with its own survey design.

Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once. Length counted with cl100k_base; the agent that loads this file may tokenize it differently.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 325,949. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.