Refactor
npx -y skills add andresnator/agents-orchestrator --skill refactorAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Cross-language catalog of 62+ refactoring techniques based on Martin Fowler's "Refactoring" and Alexander Shvets' "Refactoring Guru". Detects the project's language automatically and provides idiomatic examples. Works with Java, Python, TypeScript, JavaScript, C#, Go, Kotlin, Ruby, PHP, Rust, Swift. Use this skill whenever the user asks to refactor code, improve code quality, eliminate code smells, simplify conditionals, restructure classes, improve API design, or apply any named refactoring technique. Also trigger when the user mentions code smells, legacy code improvement, clean code practices, SOLID principles, or asks "how can I improve this code". Even if the user just pastes code and asks for improvement suggestions, use this skill to identify applicable techniques. También se activa en castellano: "refactorizar", "refactorizar código", "mejorar este código", "malos olores del código", "olores de código", "código sucio", "limpiar código", "simplificar condicionales", "principios SOLID", "cómo mejorar este código", "código limpio", "reestructurar clase", "mejorar calidad del código", "técnica de refactorización", "extraer método", "renombrar variable", "mover método", "eliminar código duplicado", "reducir complejidad", "mejorar legibilidad", "reorganizar código". Includes general Java detection; Java examples should follow the project's Java version and idioms.
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
13.3 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Refactoring Catalog (Multi-Language)
A comprehensive, technique-by-technique catalog of refactoring best practices for any language, sourced from Martin Fowler's Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code (2nd Edition) and Alexander Shvets' Refactoring in Java (Refactoring Guru). Adapted for Python, TypeScript, Go, and Rust with idiomatic examples.
Step 0: Detect Language
Before applying any technique, detect the project's stack:
| Project File | Language | Idiom Style |
|---|---|---|
pom.xml / build.gradle | Java | OOP, Stream API |
pyproject.toml / requirements.txt / setup.py | Python | Duck typing, comprehensions |
package.json + tsconfig.json | TypeScript | Functional-OOP hybrid |
package.json (no tsconfig) | JavaScript | Prototype-based, functional |
*.csproj | C# | OOP, LINQ |
go.mod | Go | Composition, implicit interfaces |
build.gradle.kts | Kotlin | OOP + functional |
Gemfile | Ruby | Duck typing, open classes |
composer.json | PHP | OOP |
Cargo.toml | Rust | Ownership, traits, no inheritance |
Package.swift | Swift | Protocol-oriented |
If the language is Java, apply techniques with Java OOP, Stream API where appropriate, and the project's detected Java version constraints. Use references/java-notes.md for Java-specific constraints and the Java completion gate.
Language Support Matrix
| Concept | Python | TypeScript | Go | Rust |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Class / struct | class | class | struct + methods | struct + impl |
| Inheritance | class Child(Parent) | extends | Embedding (no inheritance) | Traits (no inheritance) |
| Interface / contract | Protocol / ABC | interface | interface (implicit) | trait |
| Encapsulation | _private convention | private keyword | Unexported (lowercase) | Private by default, pub |
| Polymorphism | Duck typing + ABC | Interfaces + classes | Implicit interfaces | Trait objects + generics |
| Generics | typing.Generic[T] | <T> | [T any] | <T: Trait> |
| Error handling | Exceptions | Exceptions | Error values (error) | Result<T, E> |
| Null safety | None / Optional[T] | null / undefined / ? | nil (zero values) | Option<T> |
| Collections pipeline | Comprehensions / generators | Array methods (.map, .filter) | for range (no pipeline) | Iterator chain (.filter().map()) |
| Pattern matching | match (3.10+) | switch (no pattern matching) | switch (no pattern matching) | match (exhaustive) |
| Factory pattern | @classmethod / module function | Static method / function | NewXxx() function | Type::new() associated fn |
| Builder pattern | __init__ + kwargs / dataclass | Fluent builder class | Functional options | Builder with consuming self |
For detailed concept-to-language mappings, see references/language-idioms.md.
Core Philosophy
Refactoring is the process of changing the internal structure of code without altering its observable behavior. It is a disciplined technique, not a random cleanup. The golden rule is: Cover → Modify → Refactor (always have tests before you start).
How to Use This Skill
- Detect the language (Step 0 above)
- Diagnose first: Identify the code smell (see
techniques/00-code-smells-diagnostic.md) - Check applicability: See
references/language-applicability.mdfor technique availability per language - Select technique: Each smell maps to one or more refactoring techniques; when several compete, use
references/selection-heuristics.mdfor the ordered decision rules - Read the technique file: Each technique has multi-language examples (Python, TypeScript, Go, Rust)
- For Java: Read
references/java-notes.md, use Java OOP/Stream idioms, honor Java 8 versus Java 11+ API availability, and finish with the Java completion gate - For language idiom mapping: See
references/language-idioms.md - Apply incrementally: Small steps, test after each change, commit frequently
Technique Categories
The techniques are organized in 7 groups. Each technique has its own file in the techniques/ directory.
Group 1: Composing Methods (techniques/01-XX)
Techniques for building clean, well-structured methods. The foundation of all refactoring.
01-extract-method.md— Extract a code fragment into a named function02-inline-method.md— Replace a function call with the function body03-extract-variable.md— Give a name to a complex expression04-inline-variable.md— Remove a variable that adds no clarity05-replace-temp-with-query.md— Replace temp variables with function calls06-replace-method-with-method-object.md— Turn a complex function into its own class/struct07-substitute-algorithm.md— Replace an algorithm with a clearer version
Group 2: Moving Features (techniques/02-XX)
Techniques for placing code where it truly belongs.
08-move-method.md— Move a function to where it has more cohesion09-move-field.md— Move a field to the type that uses it most10-extract-class.md— Split a type with multiple responsibilities11-inline-class.md— Merge a type that does too little12-hide-delegate.md— Encapsulate chain navigation behind a simpler interface13-remove-middle-man.md— Remove unnecessary delegation14-move-statements.md— Move statements into/out of functions, slide statements15-split-loop.md— Separate a loop that does multiple things16-replace-loop-with-pipeline.md— Use declarative pipelines instead of imperative loops17-remove-dead-code.md— Delete unused code
Group 3: Organizing Data (techniques/03-XX)
Techniques for enriching data with behavior and protecting internal state.
18-encapsulate-variable.md— Wrap data access with getters/functions19-encapsulate-record.md— Convert data structures into objects/structs20-encapsulate-collection.md— Protect collections from external mutation21-replace-primitive-with-object.md— Create domain types instead of using raw primitives22-split-variable.md— Give each purpose its own variable23-rename-field.md— Improve field names for clarity24-replace-derived-variable-with-query.md— Calculate values on demand25-change-reference-to-value.md— Make objects immutable (Value Objects)26-change-value-to-reference.md— Share a single instance across consumers27-replace-type-code-with-subclasses.md— Convert type codes to polymorphic hierarchy
Group 4: Simplifying Conditionals (techniques/04-XX)
Techniques for taming conditional complexity.
28-decompose-conditional.md— Name condition and branches29-consolidate-conditional.md— Merge related conditions30-replace-nested-conditional-with-guard-clauses.md— Early returns for special cases31-replace-conditional-with-polymorphism.md— Use polymorphism instead of switch/if-type32-introduce-special-case.md— Null Object pattern for default behavior33-introduce-assertion.md— Document invariants with executable assertions34-replace-control-flag.md— Replace boolean flags with break/return
Group 5: Simplifying Method Calls / API Design (techniques/05-XX)
Techniques for building self-documenting interfaces.
35-change-function-declaration.md— Rename functions and change parameters36-introduce-parameter-object.md— Group related parameters into an object37-parameterize-function.md— Unify similar functions with a parameter38-remove-flag-argument.md— Replace boolean params with named functions39-preserve-whole-object.md— Pass the object instead of extracted values40-replace-parameter-with-query.md— Let the function calculate what it needs41-replace-query-with-parameter.md— Pass value as param for purity/testability42-remove-setting-method.md— Make properties read-only43-replace-constructor-with-factory.md— Use factory functions for flexible creation44-replace-function-with-command.md— Encapsulate function as object45-separate-query-from-modifier.md— CQS: separate reads from writes
Group 6: Dealing with Generalization (techniques/06-XX)
Techniques for refactoring type hierarchies and shared behavior.
46-pull-up-method.md— Move duplicated functions to shared parent/trait/interface47-push-down-method.md— Move specialized functions to specific types48-pull-up-constructor-body.md— Unify constructor/initialization logic49-extract-superclass.md— Create common parent for shared behavior50-extract-interface.md— Define a contract without implementation51-collapse-hierarchy.md— Merge unnecessary hierarchy levels52-form-template-method.md— Template Method pattern53-replace-subclass-with-delegate.md— Composition over inheritance54-replace-superclass-with-delegate.md— Replace extends with has-a55-replace-inheritance-with-delegation.md— General inheritance to delegation
Group 7: Additional Techniques (techniques/07-XX)
Cross-cutting techniques from both sources.
56-combine-functions-into-class.md— Group functions that share data57-combine-functions-into-transform.md— Enrich read-only data58-split-phase.md— Separate code into processing phases59-introduce-foreign-method.md— Extend third-party types you can't modify60-introduce-local-extension.md— Wrapper or subclass for library extension61-replace-error-code-with-exception.md— Modernize error handling62-replace-exception-with-test.md— Don't use exceptions for control flow
Diagnostic Guide
Start with techniques/00-code-smells-diagnostic.md to identify which techniques apply to your code. The diagnostic maps 24 code smells to their recommended refactoring techniques.
Applying the Skill
When given code to refactor:
- Detect the language (Step 0)
- Read
techniques/00-code-smells-diagnostic.mdto identify the smells present - For each identified smell, read the corresponding technique file(s)
- Check
references/language-applicability.md— if the technique doesn't apply to the target language, the table shows the alternative - Apply techniques in small steps, always testing between changes
- Provide idiomatic examples for the detected language
- Explain WHY each refactoring improves the code, not just HOW to do it
- For Java, report the
references/java-notes.mdJava completion gate verdict - For language-specific idiom translations, consult
references/language-idioms.md
Key Principles
These principles underpin every technique in the catalog:
- Names matter more than length — a well-named 1-line function is better than an inline expression
- Small steps — extract small fragments, test, commit. Never batch multiple changes
- Intention over implementation — code should communicate WHAT, not HOW
- Data and logic that change together should live together — cohesion is king
- Prefer composition over inheritance — delegation is more flexible than extends
- Immutability is a powerful preservative — immutable data is easier to reason about
- CQS (Command-Query Separation) — a function either returns a value or modifies state, never both
Reference Files
| File | Content |
|---|---|
references/language-idioms.md | Refactoring concept → {Python, TypeScript, Go, Rust} equivalents |
references/language-applicability.md | 62-technique × language applicability matrix with alternatives |
references/java-notes.md | Java-specific constraints, Java 8 vs 11+ notes, and the Java completion gate |
references/selection-heuristics.md | Ordered decision rules when several techniques compete: conditionals tree, smell directionality, falsifiable micro-tests, inheritance→delegation triggers |
references/technique-to-pattern.md | Which refactoring techniques land on which GoF pattern (Kerievsky bridge) |
Gives 2 of the 12 instructions most refactoring skills give
Counted across 521 of the 525 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-08-06
- run tests after each changehere, and in 59 of 521, across 56 files
- write tests before refactoringin 27 of 521, across 24 files
- preserve external behaviorin 26 of 521, across 22 files
- remove dead codein 25 of 521, across 24 files
- make small incremental changeshere, and in 20 of 521, across 17 files
- break the implementation into tiny commitsin 18 of 521, across 5 files
- ask the user about alternative optionsin 17 of 521, across 4 files
- create a GitHub issue with the planin 17 of 521, across 4 files
- explore the repository to verify assertionsin 17 of 521, across 4 files
- interview the user about the refactorin 16 of 521, across 3 files
- check the codebase for test coveragein 16 of 521, across 3 files
- refactor one thing at a timein 16 of 521, across 12 files
Said here and by no other author read
- diagnose code smells before selecting a technique
- check technique applicability for the detected language
- read the specific file for the selected technique
- provide idiomatic examples for the detected language
- honor detected Java version constraints and completion gate
Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once.