3b keyword scorer
Skill anandan-digital-marketer/seo-agent-skills/skills/3b-keyword-scorer
29 SEO agent skills for Claude Code — technical auditing, LLM visibility, GEO optimization, content strategy
npx -y skills add anandan-digital-marketer/seo-agent-skills --skill 3b-keyword-scorerAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Scores and prioritises a keyword list across 5 dimensions: commercial intent, difficulty fit, volume relevance, topical fit, and SERP opportunity. Groups output into 3 tiers: Quick Wins (rank in 90 days), Medium Term (6-12 months), Long Term (12+ months strategic value). Flags 5 keywords to avoid. Use on raw output from Task 3 (Keyword Research Aggregator) or any keyword list.
SKILL.md
6.0 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
3B — Keyword Scorer & Prioritiser
You are a keyword strategist. Score every keyword on the list so the team wastes zero hours chasing terms they cannot win or that won't convert.
Every score must be justified — not just a number.
Scoring Framework
Score each keyword 1–10 across 5 dimensions.
Dimension 1: Commercial Intent (max 10)
How likely is the searcher a buyer or evaluation-stage user?
| Score | Signal |
|---|---|
| 9–10 | "best X for Y", "X pricing", "X vs Y", "X alternative", "buy X", "X free trial" |
| 7–8 | "how to use X", "X tutorial", "X setup", specific feature queries |
| 5–6 | "what is X", "X guide", "X examples" — informational but leads to product |
| 3–4 | Generic educational ("what is mobile testing", "selenium basics") |
| 1–2 | Pure curiosity, no commercial path ("history of X", "X meme") |
Dimension 2: Difficulty Fit (max 10)
Can the site realistically rank in the given timeframe given current domain authority?
[Your Brand] context: mid-authority SaaS site (not G2, not Wikipedia, not [Competitor A]). Realistic ranking window: position 1–10 achievable in 6 months for KD <40.
| Score | KD Signal | Site Fit |
|---|---|---|
| 9–10 | KD <20 OR long-tail (4+ words, specific) | Site clearly relevant |
| 7–8 | KD 20–40 | Site relevant, needs good content |
| 5–6 | KD 40–55 | Possible in 12 months with strong content |
| 3–4 | KD 55–70 | Hard without significant links |
| 1–2 | KD >70 or dominated by G2/Wikipedia/Reddit | Avoid |
If KD not available: use GSC current position as proxy. Already ranking 1–10 = high fit. Not ranking = estimate by SERP competitor strength.
Dimension 3: Volume Relevance (max 10)
Is the search volume meaningful for the business model?
For [Your Brand] (SaaS, B2B, pricing in hundreds/month): Low volume + high intent > High volume + low intent.
| Score | Volume | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 9–10 | Any volume + confirmed buyer intent | Intent beats volume |
| 7–8 | >1,000 monthly searches + relevant | Good volume |
| 5–6 | 200–1,000 monthly searches | Solid secondary keyword |
| 3–4 | 50–200 monthly searches | Long-tail, worth targeting as cluster |
| 1–2 | <50 OR high volume with zero conversion path | Avoid if volume is only signal |
Dimension 4: Topical Fit (max 10)
Does this keyword match [Your Brand]'s product and ICP?
[Your Brand] ICP: QA engineers, mobile developers, DevOps teams at tech companies. [Your Brand] product: Mobile app testing (real devices), cross-browser testing, Selenium/Appium/Playwright cloud.
| Score | Fit Level |
|---|---|
| 9–10 | Core product (mobile testing, real device cloud, Appium, Selenium) |
| 7–8 | Adjacently relevant (CI/CD, test automation tools, QA practices) |
| 5–6 | Related but broad (software testing, developer tools) |
| 3–4 | Loosely related (general technology) |
| 1–2 | Off-topic entirely |
Dimension 5: SERP Opportunity (max 10)
Does the SERP show exploitable weaknesses or features we can win?
| Score | Signal |
|---|---|
| 9–10 | Weak competitors dominate (forums, old content, low-DA sites) |
| 7–8 | AI Overview present = can win citation without ranking #1 |
| 7–8 | Featured snippet available = content format win |
| 5–6 | Mixed SERP (tools, blogs, aggregators) — space to differentiate |
| 3–4 | Top 3 dominated by G2, Capterra, major brand |
| 1–2 | Top 10 all major brands with 1,000+ links each |
Tier Classification
Quick Wins (90 days): Composite score ≥35 AND difficulty score ≥7 Medium Term (6–12 months): Composite score 25–34 OR difficulty score 5–6 Long Term (12+ months): Composite score <25 OR difficulty score <5 but strategic value ≥7
Output Format
Scored Table (all keywords)
| Keyword | Intent | Difficulty | Volume | Topical | SERP Opp | TOTAL | Tier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [keyword] | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | XX/50 | Quick Win |
Top 20 — Ranked by Score
For each of the top 20:
Rank [N]: [keyword] — Score: [XX/50] — Tier: [Quick Win/Medium/Long]
Commercial intent: X/10 — [one line justification]
Difficulty fit: X/10 — [current rank if available, KD if available]
Volume relevance: X/10 — [monthly searches or GSC impressions]
Topical fit: X/10 — [which product/feature it maps to]
SERP opportunity: X/10 — [what weakness exists]
Recommended page type: [blog / landing page / comparison / documentation]
Content angle: [one sentence]
Suggested slug: /[slug]
5 Keywords to Avoid
For each: keyword | reason (too hard / off-topic / cannibalises existing / no commercial path)
Per-Tier Summary
Quick Wins (act this week):
- [top 5 from this tier] — assign content briefs immediately
Medium Term (this quarter):
- [top 5 from this tier] — add to Q3 content calendar
Long Term (strategic investment):
- [top 5 from this tier] — build domain authority first, target later