Bar raiser interviewing
Skill Amey-Thakur/AI-SKILLS/skills/big-tech-processes/bar-raiser-interviewing
Plug-and-play skills and prompts for every AI coding agent
npx -y skills add Amey-Thakur/AI-SKILLS --skill bar-raiser-interviewingAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- 19 days oldThe repository was created 19 days ago. New is not bad, but a brand new repository carrying a familiar-sounding name is the shape a typosquat arrives in, and there has been no time for anyone else to find a problem with it.
- 4 stars4 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Interview as an Amazon-style bar raiser who holds an independent veto and judges each candidate against the long-term hiring bar. Use when you sit on an interview loop as the neutral interviewer accountable for the bar, not for filling the team's open seat.
SKILL.md
3.3 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Bar raiser interviewing
A bar raiser is an interviewer with no stake in filling the seat and one job: protect the company's long-term hiring bar against the hiring manager's short-term need. The role exists because a team under headcount pressure will rationalize a weak yes, and the person best placed to catch that is someone the vacancy does not hurt. Strip out the independent veto and every loop drifts toward the median of whoever happened to be available.
Method
- Confirm your independence before the loop starts. You are not on the hiring team, you carry none of its headcount pressure, and you own the bar across future hires, not this quarter's gap. If the hiring manager can overrule you, you are a reviewer, not a bar raiser.
- Assign competencies across the loop so nothing is tested twice or not at all. Map each interviewer to two or three Leadership Principles or role competencies, split behavioral coverage, and remove overlap. A loop where three people probe the same strength has three blind spots.
- Collect written feedback independently before the debrief. Each interviewer submits Inclined or Not Inclined with evidence before hearing anyone else. Feedback written after the room talks is anchored feedback, and groupthink launders a weak candidate into a hire.
- Demand evidence, not impressions. Push interviewers to STAR structure: Situation, Task, Action, Result, and separate the candidate's "I" from the team's "we". "Strong presence" is a vibe; "reduced p99 latency 40% by rewriting the cache path" is a signal.
- Apply the raises-the-bar test explicitly. The question is not "would I work with them" but "is this person better than half of current employees at this level in this role". A hire who lowers the median is a no even when the team is desperate.
- Run the debrief to surface dissent, not bury it. Ask the lowest-confidence interviewer first, make each vote defend its evidence, and block the hiring manager's urgency or the loudest voice from carrying the room. Consensus reached by fatigue is not consensus.
- Exercise the veto when the bar is not met, and write down why. An independent no, recorded with its reasoning, is a legitimate and durable outcome. Reopening the search costs weeks; a mis-hire costs the team for years.
Litmus tests
- Could you defend the decision to someone who joins the company in two years and reads only the written feedback?
- Did any yes rest on team fit or urgency rather than evidence of the competency?
- Would this candidate raise the median of the current team at this level?
Boundaries
The bar raiser judges the hire against the long-term bar, not sourcing diversity, comp negotiation, or the hiring manager's read on day-to-day team fit. This is an Amazon-shaped ritual: adapt the veto and the leveling rubric to your org's convention, and never let it stand in for reference checks or the manager's own call on scope.