Amadeus grilling
Agent skills, templates, examples, validators, and docs for operating Amadeus DLC, a lifecycle contract for AI driven software development.
npx -y skills add amadeus-dlc/amadeus --skill amadeus-grillingAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 5 stars5 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Read-only grilling interview. Relentlessly interviews you about a plan, design, or file — one question at a time, each with a recommended answer — until you and the agent reach a shared understanding. Facts are looked up in the codebase; only decisions are put to you. Use when you want to stress-test a plan or design before building. Never advances the workflow stage pointer, never emits audit events, never writes files unless you explicitly ask for the summary to be saved.
SKILL.md
2.8 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Amadeus Grilling
Purpose
Interview the user relentlessly about every aspect of a plan, design, or decision space until agent and user reach a shared understanding — one question at a time, each with a recommended answer and its rationale.
The discipline is defined ONCE, in
.codex/amadeus-common/protocols/grilling-protocol.md (§1 Dialogue
Discipline, §2 The Grilling Loop, §3 Question Spec Templates). Read that file
first and follow it exactly. This skill adds only the standalone-specific
rules below — it does not re-define the discipline.
Classification
Read-only. This skill never advances the workflow stage pointer and never
emits an audit event. It is safe to run at any point, with or without an
active workflow. The workflow-only obligations in the protocol (questions
file, decision/answer audit logging) do NOT apply here — everything
happens in the conversation.
Standalone rules
- Subject comes from the argument: a file path or a topic. If a file path, read it (and whatever it references) as the starting material for the Investigate step. If no argument was given, ask "What should I grill you about?" as the very first question.
- Discipline is the protocol's §1 and §2 in full: one question at a time, recommended answer with rationale, facts self-researched with only decisions asked, estimates confirmed with a confidence level, hybrid termination ("done" at any time; continuation check at the depth guideline), and an explicitly confirmed agreement summary before closing.
- Output is terminal-only. Print the agreement summary (the full
question → decision table) to the terminal. Write it to a file ONLY when
the user explicitly asks for it to be saved to a path (e.g. "save the
summary to docs/plan-review.md") — the same explicit-request exception
/amadeus-outcomes-packuses. Never write anywhere unprompted. - No enactment. Do not start implementing the plan under discussion. The skill ends at the confirmed summary; acting on it is a separate, user-initiated step.