Alterlab citation mgmt
Skill AlterLab-IEU/AlterLab-Academic-Skills/skills/writing-tools/alterlab-citation-mgmt
239 evaluated academic Claude/agent skills across 17 research domains (bioinformatics, data science, clinical, social-science methods, Turkish academia & more). Executable eval per skill, deterministic citation verifier, research→write→review→publish pipeline, and a skill-finder front door. Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI & Copilot.
npx -y skills add AlterLab-IEU/AlterLab-Academic-Skills --skill alterlab-citation-mgmtAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Manages citations for academic research — searches Google Scholar and PubMed for papers, extracts accurate metadata, validates citations, and generates properly formatted BibTeX entries. Use when finding papers, verifying citation information, converting DOIs to BibTeX, checking reference accuracy in scientific writing, or building a bibliography. Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite.
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
7.6 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Citation Management
Overview
Manage citations systematically across the research and writing process: search
academic databases (Google Scholar, PubMed), extract accurate metadata from multiple
sources (CrossRef, PubMed, arXiv, DataCite), validate citation information, and
generate properly formatted BibTeX. Critical for citation accuracy, avoiding reference
errors, and reproducible research. Integrates with the literature-review skill.
When to Use This Skill
Use when:
- Searching for specific papers on Google Scholar or PubMed
- Converting DOIs, PMIDs, or arXiv IDs to properly formatted BibTeX
- Extracting complete metadata (authors, title, journal, year, etc.)
- Validating existing citations for accuracy or checking for duplicates
- Cleaning, sorting, and formatting BibTeX files
- Finding highly cited / seminal papers in a field
- Building a bibliography for a manuscript or thesis
Core Workflow
Citation management is a five-phase pipeline. Each phase maps to a script (full CLI
in references/script_cli_reference.md) and a deep-dive reference.
Phase 1 — Paper discovery
Search Google Scholar (broad, cross-discipline) and PubMed (biomedical, MeSH-indexed).
python scripts/search_google_scholar.py "CRISPR gene editing" --limit 50 --output results.json
python scripts/search_pubmed.py "Alzheimer's disease treatment" --limit 100 --output alz.json
Operators, MeSH/field tags, complex queries, and high-impact-paper heuristics:
references/search_strategy_reference.md, references/google_scholar_search.md,
references/pubmed_search.md.
Phase 2 — Metadata extraction
Convert any identifier (DOI, PMID, arXiv ID, URL) to complete metadata. CrossRef is the primary DOI source; PubMed E-utilities, arXiv, and DataCite cover the rest.
python scripts/doi_to_bibtex.py 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 # quick single DOI
python scripts/extract_metadata.py --pmid 34265844 # any identifier type
python scripts/extract_metadata.py --input identifiers.txt --output citations.bib # batch
Sources and extracted fields: references/metadata_extraction.md and the Metadata
Sources section of references/search_strategy_reference.md.
Phase 3 — BibTeX formatting
Generate clean, standardized entries. Common types: @article, @book,
@inproceedings, @incollection, @phdthesis, @misc. Protect title capitalization
with {}, use -- for page ranges, include a DOI for modern publications.
python scripts/format_bibtex.py references.bib --deduplicate --sort year --descending \
--output clean_references.bib
Entry types, required fields, and formatting rules: references/bibtex_formatting.md.
Phase 4 — Validation
Verify required fields are present, data is consistent, and there are no duplicates.
DOI resolution is network-bound and OFF by default — add --check-dois to actually
hit doi.org/CrossRef (slow). validate_citations.py reports only; it does not rewrite
the file. To apply fixes (page dashes, author separators, dedup), run format_bibtex.py.
python scripts/validate_citations.py references.bib --check-dois \
--report validation.json --verbose
Validation criteria and report format: references/citation_validation.md and the
Validation Checks summary in references/search_strategy_reference.md.
Phase 5 — Integration with writing
Export validated BibTeX into a LaTeX manuscript (\bibliography{final_references}).
Pairs with literature-review (search/synthesis), scientific-writing (manuscript
references), and venue-templates (style-specific formatting).
End-to-end worked examples (build a bibliography, convert a DOI list, clean a messy
.bib, find seminal papers): references/example_workflows.md.
Best Practices
Search: start broad then narrow; use multiple sources; leverage "Cited by" for seminal papers; document queries and dates.
Metadata: prefer DOIs (most reliable, best CrossRef metadata); verify author names, venue, and year; handle preprints (use the published version when one exists); keep author-name and journal-abbreviation formatting consistent.
BibTeX quality: meaningful citation keys (FirstAuthor2024keyword); protect title
capitalization with {}; remove redundant fields; validate syntax regularly; organize
per project and merge carefully to avoid duplicates.
Validation: validate early and often; fix broken DOIs and missing fields promptly; manually review critical citations.
Common Pitfalls
- Single-source bias → search multiple databases.
- Accepting metadata blindly → spot-check against originals.
- Ignoring DOI errors → validate before submission.
- Inconsistent formatting → standardize with
format_bibtex.py. - Duplicate entries → use duplicate detection.
- Missing required fields → validate for completeness.
- Outdated preprints → update to the published version.
- Special-character issues → escape or use Unicode in BibTeX.
- No final validation → always run validation as the last check.
- Manual BibTeX entry → always extract from metadata sources.
Index of Bundled Resources
References (references/)
script_cli_reference.md— full per-script features and CLI usageexample_workflows.md— four end-to-end worked workflowssearch_strategy_reference.md— high-impact heuristics, Scholar operators, MeSH/field tags, metadata sourcesgoogle_scholar_search.md— complete Google Scholar search guidepubmed_search.md— PubMed and E-utilities API documentationmetadata_extraction.md— metadata sources and field requirementscitation_validation.md— validation criteria and quality checksbibtex_formatting.md— BibTeX entry types and formatting rules
Scripts (scripts/)
search_google_scholar.py, search_pubmed.py, extract_metadata.py,
validate_citations.py, format_bibtex.py, doi_to_bibtex.py.
Assets (assets/)
bibtex_template.bib (example entries for all types), citation_checklist.md (QA checklist).
External Resources
- Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.com/ · PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
- CrossRef API: https://api.crossref.org/ · PubMed E-utilities: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK25501/
- arXiv API: https://arxiv.org/help/api/ · DataCite API: https://api.datacite.org/
- MeSH Browser: https://meshb.nlm.nih.gov/search · DOI Resolver: https://doi.org/
Dependencies
# Core
pip install requests bibtexparser biopython
# Optional: Google Scholar access, advanced validation, LaTeX char handling
pip install scholarly selenium crossref-commons pylatexenc
Summary
This skill provides search (Scholar + PubMed), automated metadata extraction (DOI/PMID/ arXiv/URL), citation validation (DOI verification + completeness), BibTeX formatting and cleaning, and quality assurance — all reproducible through documented search and extraction methods. Use it to maintain accurate, publication-ready bibliographies.