agentsclimarketplace

Threat model sidecar

Skill alpha-omega-security/threat-model/skills/threat-model-sidecar

Agent skill for producing threat models for open-source projects

Install
npx -y skills add alpha-omega-security/threat-model --skill threat-model-sidecar

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

2 things to look at

  • 28 days oldThe repository was created 28 days ago. New is not bad, but a brand new repository carrying a familiar-sounding name is the shape a typosquat arrives in, and there has been no time for anyone else to find a problem with it.
  • 5 stars5 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Emit and validate the §1.19 machine-readable companion threat-model.yaml using schema threat-model-sidecar/v2. USE WHEN an orchestrated threat model is ready for publication, automated or AI-assisted triage, dependency compatibility analysis, or sidecar regeneration after prose changes. Projects provenance- backed components, input obligations, contract dimensions, outputs, adversaries, dependencies, configurations, properties, misuses, non-findings, and the closed disposition enum. Prose remains canonical. DO NOT USE FOR: writing prose or routing a finding.

SKILL.md

7.3 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Threat Model — Sidecar (machine-readable companion)

Owns §1.19: emit threat-model.yaml alongside the prose document so shared triage tooling can consume the model without parsing prose. Follow the schema in sidecar-schema.md exactly — sidecars are only useful to tooling if they are structurally uniform across projects.

Principles

  • Prose is canonical; the sidecar is a derived index. Do not put anything in the sidecar that is not already asserted in the prose. If the two disagree, the sidecar is wrong.
  • Record provenance of derivation — set prose_version to the canonical relative prose path plus SHA-256 of its exact UTF-8 bytes, and regenerate whenever the prose changes.
  • Uniform shape only — use the schema: threat-model-sidecar/v2 fields as given; extend with project-specific keys only under an x- prefix.

Procedure

  1. Confirm the prose document is at least a complete draft (all sections substantive or N/A). If §1.7/§1.8/§1.11/§1.17 are incomplete, stop and hand back — the sidecar cannot be faithfully derived from a partial model.
  2. Project each prose section into its sidecar block:
    • §1.2/§1.3/§1.4 → components (scope: in|out, out-reason, and per- component reachability precondition).
    • §1.5 → host_side_effects[] — explicit present/absent/conditional host effects with components, conditions, and provenance.
    • §1.7 → entry_points[].parameters[] — every attacker-controllable parameter must have a non-empty caller_must_enforce and at least one value in its control_kinds array.
    • §1.7-§1.12 → contract_dimensions[] — all eight required dimensions for every in-scope component, including explicit not-applicable rows; claimed/disclaimed rows reference stable property IDs and unresolved rows reference §1.18 question IDs.
    • §1.8 → outputs[] (taint: same-as-input | sanitized | constrained, in-scope component, separately provenanced invariants, and downstream must-not-assume records).
    • §1.10 → adversaries[] (in/out of scope, capabilities, excluded capabilities, goals, provenance).
    • §1.9 → dependency_policy + dependencies[], including stable relied_on_properties, acknowledged obligation IDs, adversary capabilities actually forwarded, and output channels/taint handling; an empty list plus zero_runtime_dependencies: true is the explicit zero-dependency claim, not an omission. Leave outputs_consumed: [] unless the project holds an output-sanitization-kind property about a dependency's output — each entry's supports_property_id must reference such a property. If the project passes a dependency's output straight through and disclaims sanitization (the common case), the list stays empty; the passthrough taint is already recorded in §1.8 outputs[] and the §1.12 disclaimers. Do not point supports_property_id at a behavioral, atomicity, or probabilistic property.
    • §1.6 → build_policy + build_flags[] (default, security_relevant, support stance, affected property IDs/effects, provenance).
    • §1.11 → properties_claimed[] (kind, components, tier, conditions, violation symptoms, provenance).
    • §1.12 → properties_disclaimed[] (components, conditions, false_friend: true|false, provenance).
    • §1.13 → downstream_responsibilities[] linked to obligation/property IDs.
    • §1.14 → known_misuses[], the structured basis for VALID-HARDENING.
    • §1.15 → known_non_findings[], with component/sink, conditions, and discharged_by stable IDs sufficient for exact (not fuzzy) matching.
    • §1.17 → dispositions plus disposition_precedence — the fixed closed enum and first-match order, verbatim.
  3. Normalize the prose status to the schema enum (draft, unratified-draft, under-review, accepted) using the mapping in sidecar-schema.md; set confidence to match the §1.1 counts exactly. Project the header's triage policy to the top-level triage_policy (strict default / relaxed). Carry tier (security-critical | correctness-only) on every properties_disclaimed[] entry so a consumer can enforce the assumption security-critical floor.

Validation gate

Reject (and hand back) if any of these fail:

  • confidence equals the header's draft-confidence count.
  • model_status is the normalized schema value for the prose status.
  • prose_version has the required path-plus-SHA-256 form and its digest matches the prose bytes.
  • Every attacker-controllable input operand has a non-empty caller_must_enforce; explicit none — <property ID> means safe handling is project-owned, while every actual caller obligation has a stable ID.
  • Every parameter has a non-empty control_kinds array containing only valid values.
  • Every in-scope component × each required contract dimension is present exactly once, claimed/disclaimed property IDs resolve, and every unresolved row cites a §1.18 question ID.
  • Every closure-driving component, parameter trust decision, output invariant, adversary, dependency, build policy/flag, property, responsibility, misuse, and non-finding has provenance sufficient to enforce the closure constraint for every model status and triage policy.
  • dispositions is exactly the closed enum — no project-specific dispositions invented (a finding fitting none is MODEL-GAP, a prose revision, not a new label).
  • disposition_precedence equals §1.17's canonical first-match order.
  • Every properties_claimed[] entry has a tier and at least one violation_symptom; every claimed/disclaimed property and contract row has provenance.
  • Every dependency reliance, caller-obligation acknowledgement, output invariant, configuration effect, responsibility, and non-finding discharge reference resolves to a stable ID.
  • An accepted model has zero inferred and zero assumption claims; a model with any inferred or assumption record remains under-review or unratified-draft.
  • triage_policy is strict or relaxed (defaulting to strict when the header is silent); every assumption provenance record carries a question_id, and every properties_disclaimed[] entry carries a tier.
  • No key outside the schema except under an x- prefix.

Output

threat-model.yaml next to the prose document, plus a one-line note of the prose_version it was derived from for the orchestrator's finalize gate.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.