Bowen grant orchestrator
Skill allenlee0430/bowen-ai-skills/skills/bowen-grant-orchestrator
Reusable Codex and Claude Code skills for research operations, grants, evidence synthesis, lab-in-the-loop planning, file curation, and faculty workflows.
npx -y skills add allenlee0430/bowen-ai-skills --skill bowen-grant-orchestratorAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Triage, plan, draft, and quality-control scientific grants, fellowships, awards, letters of intent, and nomination packages for Bowen Li's research program. Use when evaluating opportunity fit, extracting sponsor requirements, building a workback plan, assigning evidence, coordinating sections and collaborators, or checking a submission for compliance and persuasive claim-evidence alignment.
SKILL.md
1.7 KB, 262 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Bowen Grant Orchestrator
Workflow
- Read
references/quality-gates.md. - Obtain the official call, deadline, page limits, evaluation criteria, eligibility, required attachments, and budget rules. Treat sponsor documents as authoritative.
- Produce a bid/no-bid assessment: strategic fit, win theme, evidence strength, missing dependencies, effort, and deadline risk.
- Translate evaluation criteria into a compliance matrix and outline. Assign every criterion to a section and evidence source.
- Build the workback plan with owner, dependency, due date, review gate, and final buffer.
- Draft from a claim-evidence bank. Use current CV, papers, preliminary data, awards, mentoring, and institutional support only when verified.
- Run scientific, narrative, compliance, budget, and submission-readiness gates.
Deliverables
- opportunity brief;
- win themes and risk register;
- compliance matrix;
- section outline and evidence bank;
- workback schedule;
- final red-team report.
Rules
- Never fabricate eligibility, sponsor rules, citations, collaborators, preliminary data, or budgets.
- Mark placeholders and owner assignments explicitly.
- Distinguish scientific ambition from funded-scope feasibility.
- Prefer one coherent program thesis over a collection of disconnected aims.