agentsclimarketplace

Tech debt tracker

Skill alirezarezvani/claude-skills/engineering/skills/tech-debt-tracker

Scan codebases for technical debt, score severity, track trends, and generate prioritized remediation plans. Use when users mention tech debt, code quality, refactoring priority, debt scoring, cleanup sprints, or code health assessment. Also use for legacy code modernization planning and maintenance cost estimation.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill tech-debt-tracker

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

SKILL.md

4.6 KB, 913 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Tech Debt Tracker

Tier: POWERFUL 🔥
Category: Engineering Process Automation
Expertise: Code Quality, Technical Debt Management, Software Engineering

Overview

Tech debt is one of the most insidious challenges in software development - it compounds over time, slowing down development velocity, increasing maintenance costs, and reducing code quality. This skill provides a comprehensive framework for identifying, analyzing, prioritizing, and tracking technical debt across codebases.

Tech debt isn't just about messy code - it encompasses architectural shortcuts, missing tests, outdated dependencies, documentation gaps, and infrastructure compromises. Like financial debt, it accrues "interest" through increased development time, higher bug rates, and reduced team velocity.

What This Skill Provides

This skill offers three interconnected tools that form a complete tech debt management system:

  1. Debt Scanner - Automatically identifies tech debt signals in your codebase
  2. Debt Prioritizer - Analyzes and prioritizes debt items using cost-of-delay frameworks
  3. Debt Dashboard - Tracks debt trends over time and provides executive reporting

Together, these tools enable engineering teams to make data-driven decisions about tech debt, balancing new feature development with maintenance work.

Quick Start — scan → prioritize → dashboard

All paths relative to this skill folder. The scanner's JSON output feeds the prioritizer directly; dated inventory snapshots feed the dashboard.

1. Scan the codebase

python3 scripts/debt_scanner.py /path/to/codebase --format json --output debt_inventory.json

Emits debt_inventory.json with scan_metadata, summary, debt_items[], file_statistics, and recommendations. Report the summary counts to the user. (Dry run: assets/sample_codebase.)

2. Prioritize the backlog

python3 scripts/debt_prioritizer.py debt_inventory.json --framework wsjf --team-size 6 --sprint-capacity 20 --format json --output debt_priorities.json

Frameworks: cost_of_delay (default), wsjf, rice. Output contains prioritized_backlog (work top-down), sprint_allocation (paste into sprint planning), and insights.

3. Track trends over time

Keep dated snapshots (debt_YYYY-MM-DD.json), then:

python3 scripts/debt_dashboard.py --input-dir snapshots/ --period monthly --format both --output debt_dashboard

Or pass files explicitly (samples: assets/historical_debt_2024-01-15.json assets/historical_debt_2024-02-01.json). The dashboard reports trend direction and executive-ready summaries — use it to verify a cleanup sprint actually reduced debt.

Verification loop

After a remediation sprint: re-run step 1, re-run step 3 with the new snapshot, and assert the targeted categories' counts dropped. A cleanup that doesn't move the dashboard is rework, not debt paydown.

Technical Debt Classification Framework

→ See references/debt-frameworks.md for details (also: references/debt-classification-taxonomy.md, references/prioritization-framework.md, references/stakeholder-communication-templates.md)

Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

1. Analysis Paralysis

Problem: Spending too much time analyzing debt instead of fixing it. Solution: Set time limits for analysis, use "good enough" scoring for most items.

2. Perfectionism

Problem: Trying to eliminate all debt instead of managing it. Solution: Focus on high-impact debt, accept that some debt is acceptable.

3. Ignoring Business Context

Problem: Prioritizing technical elegance over business value. Solution: Always tie debt work to business outcomes and customer impact.

4. Inconsistent Application

Problem: Some teams adopt practices while others ignore them. Solution: Make debt tracking part of standard development workflow.

5. Tool Over-Engineering

Problem: Building complex debt management systems that nobody uses. Solution: Start simple, iterate based on actual usage patterns.

Technical debt management is not just about writing better code - it's about creating sustainable development practices that balance short-term delivery pressure with long-term system health. Use these tools and frameworks to make informed decisions about when and how to invest in debt reduction.

What ships with it: 17 files

321.9 KB alongside SKILL.md, 6 of them executable

scripts/

Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most refactoring skills give in 913 tokens

Counted across 545 of the 587 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-09-06

  • Run tests after each changein 61 of 545, across 59 files
  • Run tests before refactoringin 42 of 545
  • Revert immediately if tests failin 31 of 545, across 28 files
  • Perform refactoring in small stepsin 30 of 545, across 29 files
  • Write characterization tests for untested codein 21 of 545, across 19 files
  • Remove dead code and unused importsin 20 of 545
  • Identify code smellsin 20 of 545
  • Perform one refactoring at a timein 19 of 545
  • Commit after each successful refactoringin 17 of 545, across 15 files
  • Verify all tests pass after refactoringin 17 of 545
  • Keep refactoring separate from behavior changesin 16 of 545, across 14 files
  • Run the full test suitein 16 of 545

Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once. Length counted with cl100k_base; the agent that loads this file may tokenize it differently.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 325,949. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.