agentsclimarketplace

Agent designer

Skill alirezarezvani/claude-skills/engineering/skills/agent-designer

345 Claude Code skills & agent skills & plugins (30+ Agents, 70+ custom commands, 330+ skills, customizable references, scripts)for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, and 8 more coding agents — engineering, marketing, product, compliance, C-level advisory, research, business operations, commercial & finance, and your daily productivity skills.

Install
npx -y skills add alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill agent-designer

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Use when the user asks to design a multi-agent system, pick an orchestration pattern (supervisor/swarm/pipeline), generate tool schemas for agents, or evaluate agent execution logs for cost, latency, and failure bottlenecks. Examples: 'design an agent architecture for research automation', 'generate Anthropic tool schemas from these tool descriptions', 'analyze these agent run logs for bottlenecks'. NOT for Claude Code workflow files (use workflow-builder) or single-agent prompt design (use agent-workflow-designer).

SKILL.md

4.1 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Agent Designer — Multi-Agent System Architecture

Design, schema-generate, and evaluate multi-agent systems with three deterministic tools. The scripts are the workflow — do not freehand an architecture when the planner can score one from requirements.

When to use

  • Designing a new multi-agent system from requirements (pattern choice, roles, comms)
  • Generating provider-ready tool schemas (Anthropic + OpenAI formats) from plain tool descriptions
  • Evaluating execution logs: success rate, latency distribution, cost, bottlenecks

When NOT to use: Claude Code Workflow-tool automations → workflow-builder; single-agent workflow scaffolds → agent-workflow-designer; multi-agent fan-out at runtime → agenthub.

Pattern decision table

ChooseWhenWatch out for
Single agentOne bounded task, < ~5 toolsDon't add agents you don't need
SupervisorCentral decomposition, specialists report backSupervisor becomes the bottleneck
PipelineStrictly sequential stages with handoffsRigid order; slowest stage gates throughput
HierarchicalMultiple org layers, > ~8 agentsCommunication overhead per level
SwarmParallel peers, fault tolerance over predictabilityHard to debug; needs consensus rules

The planner applies this scoring deterministically — run it rather than picking by feel.

Workflow

All paths relative to this skill folder. Each step's JSON output is the next step's design input.

1. Design the architecture

Write a requirements JSON (copy assets/sample_system_requirements.json — keys: goal, tasks[], constraints{max_response_time, budget_per_task, concurrent_tasks}, team_size):

python3 agent_planner.py requirements.json --format json -o arch

Emits arch.json with architecture_design (pattern, agents, communication links), mermaid_diagram, and implementation_roadmap. Read architecture_design.pattern and the per-agent role list; present the mermaid diagram to the user.

2. Generate tool schemas

Describe each agent's tools in plain JSON (copy assets/sample_tool_descriptions.json), then:

python3 tool_schema_generator.py tool_descriptions.json --validate -o tools

Emits tools.json (tool_schemas, validation_summary) plus provider-specific tools_anthropic.json / tools_openai.json. Gate: every tool must print ✓ Valid. Fix any invalid schema before proceeding — never hand an agent an unvalidated schema.

3. Evaluate execution logs

Once the system runs (or against assets/sample_execution_logs.json for a dry run):

python3 agent_evaluator.py execution_logs.json --detailed -o eval

Emits eval.json with summary, agent_metrics, bottleneck_analysis, error_analysis, cost_breakdown, sla_compliance, and optimization_recommendations, plus split files (eval_errors.json, eval_recommendations.json).

4. Verification loop

The design is not done until:

  1. tool_schema_generator.py --validate reports 0 invalid schemas.
  2. agent_evaluator.py on a pilot run reports 0 critical issues (the tool prints CRITICAL: N critical issues when found). If N > 0, apply the top item in eval_recommendations.json, re-run the pilot, and re-evaluate.
  3. Compare your outputs against expected_outputs/ to confirm the schema shape you're consuming hasn't drifted.

References

  • references/agent_architecture_patterns.md — pattern trade-offs in depth
  • references/tool_design_best_practices.md — schema, idempotency, error-handling rules
  • references/evaluation_methodology.md — metric definitions the evaluator implements

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.